BROOKS KRAFT FOR TIME GREEN LEADER: The former New Jersey Governor now heads the Environmental Protection Agency

	By CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN

Posted Sunday, August 18, 2002; 7:31 a.m. EST
Among the many policy issues facing the world, few are as complex as global climate change. Countless scientific, technological and economic issues affect our understanding of the climate conundrum and our response to it. Huge uncertainties exist in these fields, and new climate observations, scientific studies and technological developments are constantly added to the equation.

One fact, however, is indisputable: President Bush has crafted the strongest, smartest and most practical climate-change program the U.S. has ever had. No previous Administration has devoted as much Cabinet-level attention to the issue or provided such resources to climate-change science, technology and mitigation programs. America has never before engaged in so many bilateral climate-change partnerships with both developed and developing nations, including China, India, Japan, Australia, Canada and Italy, as well as the European Union.

Last February the President unveiled a comprehensive policy with three main goals: resolving uncertainties in the science, developing and deploying new technologies, and strengthening domestic and international efforts to increase energy efficiency, improve air quality and prevent greenhouse-gas emissions. Collectively, the Administration's initiatives set America on a path to slow the projected growth of emissions while developing the scientific and technological knowledge and economic strength needed to enable us to ultimately stabilize or reduce emissions, as science justifies such action.

For the first time, our strategy establishes a specific and realistic goal: to reduce America's greenhouse-gas emissions relative to the size of our economy 18% over the next 10 years. Although American businesses continue to improve their energy efficiency and productivity, the President's goal is to accelerate that trend an additional 30%—the equivalent of taking 70 million cars off the road or avoiding roughly 500 million metric tons of greenhouse gases. In fact, meeting the President's goal will require emissions reductions comparable with what the Kyoto Protocol parties hope to attain—but without the devastating economic consequences of the Kyoto approach.

	The Kyoto Protocol would put millions out of work and have a negligible effect

The President's 2003 budget provides $4.5 billion for climate-related programs, a 17% funding increase. This includes $1.7 billion for basic research on climate change and $1.2 billion for research on advanced energy technologies. This funding, unmatched in the world, ensures America's leadership in efforts to develop important technologies such as a pollution-free, fuel-cell-powered car.

The President's policy also provides new resources to curb greenhouse-gas emissions right now. The budget earmarks $4.6 billion over the next five years in tax credits for renewable-energy investments such as wind and solar power and energy-efficiency projects. The President has asked the Department of Energy to develop new transferable credits for individuals or businesses that reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, providing an incentive for early reductions and ensuring their verifiability. Supporting international efforts, the President's budget provides $178 million for the Global Environment Facility—which finances projects to bring clean energy and other environmental technologies to the developing world—and $205 million for U.S. Agency for International Development climate-change programs, including $50 million for tropical-forest conservation.

Despite this unprecedented effort, partisan critics still lament the President's refusal to support the Kyoto Protocol—forgetting that the Senate voted 95 to 0 against Kyoto's principles in 1997. It's worth remembering why: Kyoto would put millions of Americans out of work for the sake of meeting unrealistic targets that would have a negligible effect. The developing world, which will soon account for the majority of all greenhouse-gas emissions, has no obligations under the Kyoto Protocol. Even the industrialized world isn't expected to make major reductions in its emissions; rather, it will simply buy credits for phantom emissions "reductions" caused largely by the collapse of Eastern European economies.

America is more engaged than ever before in meeting the challenge of climate change with smart policies that guide concrete actions today and provide a long-term vision for progress in the years ahead.

Get the Magazine — Try 4 Issues Free!

Natural Capitalism By Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins & L. Hunter Lovins Price: $16.15   [Powered by www.BN.com]

	BUSINESS Air Travel Gets a New Model Going broke fast, the major airlines will have to change the way they operate. Here's what it means for you WORLD Afghan Boot Camp Afghanistan needs an army to stand up to its warlords. Can the U.S. build one fast enough and on the cheap? PHOTO ESSAY The Palestinians Beyond the bombings and bloodshed, an intimate look at how the members of an embattled society live, work, play and die by photographer James Nachtwey SPORTS Girls in the Curl Women are remaking pro surfing, and girls are flocking to the sport. Fashion designers and Hollywood are catching the tide, and even the guys don't (always) mind