 |
January 19, 2004
Health
But that doesn't explain why people do ita question that
sexologists can't yet answer. "Tell me the etiology of
heterosexuality or homosexuality," says Moser, "and I will tell
you the etiology of SM." Federoff has compiled new online surveys
from 2,000 women and 2,000 men who identified themselves as part
of the BDSM scene. "We have only started to analyze the data," he
says, "but the first impression is that the people we have looked
at tend to look very much like regular people from all walks of
lifethat is, they tend to look like people who might fill out
Web questionnaires on any topic. Second, by the measures of
psychological health we were able to get, they tend not to look
particularly psychologically impaired"at least no more so than
the general population.
At this point, we should make clear that the BDSM these
researchers study is consensual. No one in the fledgling BDSM
movement argues in favor of actual slavery or rape (though
eroticized simulations of such crimes are common). Among the BDSM
clubs and support groups, all the reputable ones preach the BDSM
mantra: safe, sane and consensual. "Like every other subculture,
we have a fringe, an element that doesn't follow the rules," says
Susan Wright of the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, a BDSM
advocacy group formed in 1997 that claims 34 member organizations
representing 10,000 people. "But every mainstream BDSM group has
a mission statement that includes those words over and over:
safe, sane, consensual."
More specific guidelinesalways check bound limbs to ensure
circulation, for instancehave developed over the decades, she
says. BDSM has a rich history. In the 19th century, psychiatrist
Richard von Krafft-Ebing famously applied a French literary
termle sadisme, which described the sexually violent writing
style of the Marquis de Sadeto mental patients who exhibited an
"association of lust and cruelty." Less famously, Krafft-Ebing
named masochism after the bawdy novels of Leopold von
Sacher-Masoch, whose most famous work, Venus in Furs (1870),
describes the willing enslavement of a dreamy man by a beautiful
widow.
More recently, the Internet has helped connect curiosity seekers
with BDSM organizations. Doc and Surri, for instance, help lead a
North Carolina group that started less than a year ago but
already has nearly 700 people on its e-mail list. The calendar of
BDSM social events now includes gatherings for every imaginable
subgroupeverything from the International Deaf Leather Contest
(scheduled in Dallas in August) to the Black Rose convention in
the Washington area, a yearly weekend of workshops and parties
that draws 1,000.
Host communities aren't always thrilled to learn that hundreds of
kinky convention-goers will be dropping in. In 2002, after
Baptist leaders heard that the Howard Johnson hotel in Bridgeton,
Mo., had served as the site for Beat Me in St. Louis, the
Southern Baptist Convention canceled reservations at the hotel.
Last year the Kenner, La., police chief mailed letters to local
hotels urging them not to provide accommodations for Fetish in
the Fall, a four-day series of parties and educational
demonstrationsDances with Whips, for instanceset for
November. Chief Nick Congemi was worried that the gathering's
activities would be "borderline illegal"; organizers canceled the
event to spare attendees embarrassing public scrutiny.
Congemi has a point about the law. It is a bedrock principle of
common law that consent is no defense against assault charges,
and many prosecutors see BDSM activities like flogging as
assault. In the past half-century, many SM participants have been
successfully prosecuted. But while most appellate judges have
upheld those convictions, a 1999 New York State ruling is
altering the landscape. In that case, an appeals court overturned
the conviction of Oliver Jovanovic, a Columbia University grad
student who had been sentenced to 15 years for kidnapping and
sexually abusing an undergrad. Before the alleged assault, the
woman had e-mailed her SM fantasies to Jovanovic. The trial judge
had refused to admit the e-mail messages into evidence, but the
appeals court held that while no one has a constitutional right
to engage in SM, the e-mails would have shed light on whether
Jovanovic reasonably believed that the woman had consented.
Of all the knotty issues swirling around BDSM, consent was the
most difficult for me to understand. No means no, but does yes
always mean yes? If you ask someone to pass a flame across your
genitals or tie you up for hours or tell you what to eat, are you
in your right mind? I pressed Surri repeatedly on these issues.
Finally, after a robust drag on her cigarette (which she had
asked Doc's permission to smoke), she answered, "What we worry
about when we look at our own community and try to make sure
abuse isn't happening is whether submissives are restricted in
their speech. And I can always say what I want ... Yes, Doc makes
the final decision about things. But if he said to me, 'Shave off
your hair,' well, we would have some issues because there's not a
chance in hell I would do that." Surri and Doc do take the
master/slave relationship to elaborate lengths, but she can
always end it. "Ultimately," she says, "I have more control in
this relationship than he does."
Page 3 of 4 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Next > >
|
 |