April 26, 2004
It's no surprise then that some of the best designs from the past
are being dusted off and reissued for today's consumer. Maharam,
a century-old textile manufacturer, recently introduced its
Textiles of the 20th Century series, which includes fabrics by
mid-century icons like Alexander Girard and Ray and Charles
Eames. "The fact that these were designed 50 years ago and are
still as attractive as ever allows people to feel like they're
not investing in something that is going to look like 2004 three
years from now," says company co-owner Michael Maharam. George
Nelson's oversize Eye Clock became an instant best seller when it
was reintroduced last fall at the Museum of Modern Art store. And
Vitra worked closely with Jean Prouve's family to reproduce the
French designer's complete collection of mid-century furniture,
down to the trademark lacquer finish.
Traces of the past are also turning up in new creations. Thomas
O'Brien has transformed his New York City-based interior design
company Aero Studios into a veritable retro-modern empire: there
are vintage-inspired bedding and bath linens for Marshall
Field's, a furniture collection for Hickory and textiles for Lee
Jofa, to name just a few. Designer Marc Newson, whose creation
for the restaurant at Lever House is among the boldest statements
of retro modernism, incorporated Bakelite into his new line of
cookware for Tefal. Jonathan Adler's eponymous line of
needlepoint pillows, sculptural vases and Hollywood Regency-style
furnishings winks to figures like Hicks and Girard. "For me, the
interest in mid-century design really reflects a desire to get
away from the dourness of minimalism, toward a maximalist, joyful
aesthetic," says Adler. "I like to think that my stuff has an
element of familiarity as well as a newness and freshness to it."
It's easyseductive evento dismiss some of these creations as
derivative. There's something almost dirty about the word retro,
as if recalling the past were inherently lazy. But, says Paul
Thompson, director of the Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum,
"it's natural to look to antecedents and ancestors. They're
acknowledging the quotations, not plagiarizing. Otherwise it's as
boring as reading a 10th-grade essay pulled off the Internet."
Even a sophomoric reversion might be understandable at the
moment, given that the past looks so much better than the future.
But these backward glances aren't mere escapism. They help to
ground us, to sort through the clutter that surrounds usand
they're there when we need to be reassured that technology can
never replace human beings. "These reversions are essential to
the evolutionary process of style and design," says Serralta.
"They are the foundation, the building blocks on which to base
the future. Without nostalgia, there is no closure and no way to
move forward."
Page 2 of 2 1 | 2
|