The Envelope, Please
Anointing himself an arbiter of taste, Joel Stein picks what he thinks should be the Product of the Year
By Joel Stein
Winter 2004 Style & Design
For the past seven years, the editors at TIME have shut me out of the
Person of the Year meetings. I blame ageism, although I acknowledge that
I haven't helped my case with all those e-mails arguing that they should
choose me. Though, in my defense, these have been seven extraordinarily
strong years for me. So, instead of trying to influence their decision,
this year I've decided to initiate the Product of the Year category,
which I think is even better than Person of the Year because no one can
send you a free case of Persons of the Year.
That's what got me thinking about making the flat screen the Product of
the Year. I can't come close to affording one, and yet every airport,
hotel and lame chain restaurant is decorating with the screens like
they're St. Ides posters. Sure, they're pretty, compact and a perfect
way to say to guests, "I make more money than you," but it's a little
early for the flat screen. It takes a bit of glamour away from a product
when the guys from Best Buy have to come over to set it up.
I gave strong consideration to the iPod mini, but it's too similar to
the iPod, only lamer. The Treo, which finally put a phone, e-mail, a
camera and a Palm in one gadget, looks a little too much like a giant
scientific-notation calculator you hold up to your face. Sofias, the
cans of sparkling wine with a straw attached that Sofia Coppola
inspired, are hot in a Paris Hilton way, but in the end they're just
another thing her dad made for her. It was also quite a year for the
handbag, but I can't get behind something that both Monica Lewinsky and
Nicky Hilton are able to make, at least as far as handbags are
concerned. And the Alexander McQueen American Express black card, with a
concierge service that turns life into a constant stay at the Four
Seasons, became a lot less cool when I found out that Alexander McQueen
wasn't in Bullitt. I would totally pick a Bullitt credit card as Product
of the Year.
That's why I'm going with Ugg boots. Though fashion editors have been
declaring the sheepskin shoes dead every month since Daryl Hannah wore
them, and only them, in the November 2003 issue of Playboy, they have
not gone away. Sure, sometimes, like in a horror movie, when you first
see a really, really ugly thing, you are so confused and startled you
have to look at it for a while before determining that yes, that tiny
little leprechaun does have the soul of Satan. But Uggs lasted
throughout 2004. You've had a whole year to look at them. It's as if
Liza Minnelli were celebrating an anniversary with David Gest.
These are glorified Australian post-surfing socks that I hear got their
name because they are ugly. What other clue do you need? These are shoes
labeled ugly by Australiaa country that regularly sends its
good-looking people here.
Yet last winter, people were stealing Uggs from yoga studios, which
seemed like the best case of California karma imaginable until Arnold
Schwarzenegger was elected Governor. This summer women wore them with
miniskirts, making some bizarre pseudoscientific argument that they
"adapt to your body temperature" by "expelling moisture." There is often
talk about sheep not getting hot. I think these people should be forced
to wear wool sweaters at the beach. Which, if there is karma, will be my
punishment for the rest of my life.
Uggs are still so hot that starting this month, VH1 is holding an online
charity auction with boots designed by Jay-Z and Jessica Simpson. So,
Uggs, I name you Product of the Year. You have been knocked off, sold in
powder blue and pink, turned into men's shoes, and still you survive.
You conjure a certain snow-bunny sexiness, making me think of surfers
and skiers and other women who lower their inhibitions on vacation. I
admire that your soft comfort has allowed women to be cool without
wearing painful heels. And you did kind of look good on Daryl Hannah,
though that's a low bar, Uggs.
If there's a sign, however, that Uggs will disappear in 2005, it's that
Ugg Australia is hedging its bets by selling other products. Yes, it's
making handbags.
|