The Golden Globes Go to the Dogs
Mickey Rourke, left, and Bruce Springsteen both picked up Golden Globes for their work on The Wrestler
(2 of 2)
Vox Pop vs. Not Pop
On a Golden Globes blog to which he, Kate Betts and I contributed last night, TIME TV critic James Poniewozik asked if the Globes wins will "enhance Slumdog Millionaire's chances for an Oscar nom? And in turn, does this decrease Oscar's chances to improve its ratings with nominees that the TV audience has actually seen?" I'd say that the Boyle film was already a dead cert for a Best Picture nomination on the other, ultimate awards show. And if the movie continues to gather box-office momentum, it could be among the top Oscar contenders, like The Dark Knight and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, which are popular with the masses as well as critical hits.
More than once, I've rattled on about how the Academy should nominate the best popular films, not just the mini indie dramas that Hollywood hates to make but loves to give awards to, as if worthy films were crippled kids in front of an orphanage. (The Emmys and the TV side of the Globes do that too: Mad Men's audience, 2 million tops, makes it the Vicky Cristina or possibly the Synecdoche, New York of television shows.) I wish the Academy would nominate all-around solid entertainment like Iron Man for Best Picture and pass over the Rachel Getting Married's of this world. (See pictures of Oscar's youngest Best Actress nominees.)
But too much can be made of this vox pop prize-giving. First of all, the job of the Academy members is to honor the films they think are the best, not to ratify popular prejudices; leave that to the People's Choice Awards. And second, there's something craven about choosing mass consumption over quality. Back in 1942, Academy voters might have used this logic to give the Best Picture Oscar to the popular How Green Was My Valley instead of that artsy indie film (and box-office flop) Citizen Kane. Under the auspice of history, box-office failures like The Wizard of Oz and It's a Wonderful Life outshine some of their era's biggest hits. The Motion Picture Academy, even more than the HFPA, considers itself élite, and it should vote its actual preferences, regardless of whether the films made money.
It's just that, this year, there are some excellent, popular films deserving of awards. And by Oscar night, my final answer is that one of those may well be Slumdog Millionaire.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- JC Penney and Ellen, Lowe's and All-American Muslim: A Tale of Two Bigotries
- Four Ways the U.S. Could End Up at War with Iran Before the Election*
- The Art of Nazi Hunting: How Israel's Mossad Found Adolf Eichmann
- Top 10 Celebrity Restaurants
- Study: Zapping the Brain Boosts Memory
- College Endowments: Why Even Harvard Isn't As Rich As You Think
- Bradying: The Poor Man's Tebowing
- Pentagon Rules 'Shift' on Women in Combat
- Twimmolation Alert: Roland Martin Gets His Ascot in Hot Water at CNN
- House Pulls the Plug. Too Soon or Too Late?
- The Upside Of Being An Introvert (And Why Extroverts Are Overrated)
- The Brain: How The Brain Rewires Itself
- Egypt's NGO Crisis: How Will U.S. Aid Play in the Controversy?
- Why Is Your Boss Moving to Brazil?
- Friends With Benefits
- Seoul Searching
- New York City: 10 Things to Do
- Pentagon Rules 'Shift' on Women in Combat
- Haiti Papers Over the Past: The Rebranding of 'Baby Doc' Duvalier
- In Singapore, Finding Peace Among the Pain of Thaipusam




