ASIA | TECH | BUSINESS | ARTS | TRAVEL | PHOTOS | CURRENT ISSUE





Table of Contents
Subscribe to TIME



ADVERTISEMENT

PHOTOGRAPH FOR TIME BY MARK LEONG / REDUX 

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Xiaogang's villagers now eat well

It Takes a Village
A band of hungry farmers in Anhui launched China's economic revolution

"Rich families sell their mules.
Poor families sell daughters and sons.
Our families have no children to sell.
We walk the streets and beat our drums."
—Beggar's ditty from Xiaogang village

China's journey from Communism to capitalism didn't begin with a decree from Beijing. It started with a secretive meeting of hungry men who wanted only to grow more corn. For anyone bedazzled by the "Made in China" labels adorning just about everything they buy and wondering how China's rise as an economic colossus began, the answer lies in the fields tended by a farmer named Yan Hongchang.

In 1978, Xiaogang, Yan's home village of thatched-roof houses on the plains of southeastern Anhui province, ranked among the world's more miserable places. Two decades earlier, Mao had barred private land ownership and forced the peasantry onto communes, aiming to make each commune self-sufficient and render commerce between them unnecessary. Xiaogang's residents were mere laborers. They tended collective fields in exchange for "work points" that could be redeemed for food. But the commune couldn't always grow enough. In the bad years, people starved—and 1978 was a very bad year. Some families boiled poplar leaves and ate them with salt. Others ground roasted tree bark into powder to use as flour. "I sent my wife and four children to roam the countryside begging," says Yan, a tanned man with a middle school education. "Everybody was so hungry, there wasn't even a stigma."

As deputy leader of his village "work team," Yan, now 56, secretly canvassed his neighbors. Everybody agreed that communal farming had failed. Collective responsibility sounded good in theory, but in practice it meant no responsibility. Even in good-weather years, peasants saw little benefit in coaxing marginally bigger harvests from the exhausted land. With the worst drought in two decades then bearing down, says Yan, "everybody felt like we'd been through this before." During the Great Leap Forward of 1958-60, peasants across China had handed their crops to the government as required but received paltry amounts of grain in return. As many as 30 million people starved, and Anhui suffered the worst. In Fengyuan county, where Xiaogang is located, one in four people perished—90,000 in all. "We knew what it was like to starve," Yan recalls, "and we would rather die in any other way."

PHOTO ESSAY

Feeding the Nation
How the Chinese village of Xiaogang launched a people's revolt against collectivization
On the night of Dec. 23, 1978, Yan invited the heads of all 20 of Xiaogang's households to meet after dark at the biggest home in the village. Two were away begging, but the rest straggled in, wearing cotton-padded jackets held together with patches. The hamlet's accountant, who had graduated from middle school, was deputized as the scribe and given a sheet from a schoolchild's notebook. After a short discussion, Yan dictated a terse, 79-character document that outlined China's first privatization scheme. The signatories agreed to divide the commune's land into family plots, turn their production quotas over to the leadership, and keep whatever remained for themselves. "In the case of failure," it concluded, "we cadres are prepared for death or prison, and other commune members vow to raise our children until they are 18 years old."

All knew that even though the Cultural Revolution had just ended, their proposal amounted to heresy. Keeping part of the harvest for personal gain had been forbidden by authorities. Yan recalls that the other menfolk watched as he applied his signature and fingerprint. Two other work-team leaders had promised to share the responsibility by signing their names next to his, while the remaining 15 would sign below. But the pressure got to them. Yan says they instead signed below his name, as did all the others (the illiterate ones just put fingerprints). Yan's neck alone was on the line.

FROM OUR ARCHIVES
Visionary of a New China
Teng Hsiao-p'ing opens the Middle Kingdom to the world Jan. 01, 1979

Now, Undulation
"Red China's leaders these days no longer talk of the great leap forward, but of the 'law of undulating progress'... Sep. 15, 1961

The Year of the Leap
"At night the sky over ten thousand villages glows red and gold with the glare cast by countless primitive blast furnaces..." Dec. 01, 1958

Archive links are premium content
What he didn't know was this: China's emerging reformist leadership, trying to put the country back together after the chaos of the Cultural Revolution, had considered just the type of farming he had introduced—and rejected it. In Beijing, Deng Xiaoping was consolidating power by battling the leftist allies of Mao, who had died two years earlier. But Deng couldn't veer too far to the right without risking attack as a "capitalist roader." Even when he launched economic reforms at a Communist Party plenum in December 1978, Deng forbade precisely the type of household-level farming that the Xiaogang villagers planned to undertake.

Yan's action didn't stay secret for long. In May 1979, the head of his 10,000-member commune accused Xiaogang's villagers of "digging up the cornerstone of socialism." The time had come to seek higher-level support. Yan says he rose before dawn and reminded his wife that, according to the compact, their four children would be cared for if he didn't come back. "He said to tell the children he didn't do anything shameful," recounts his wife, Duan Yongxia. Then he left to find his county's Party secretary, Chen Tingyuan, a man he'd heard was open-minded. After being detained for a day by other officials opposed to the Xiaogang initiative, Yan received an audience with Chen, who had heard of Xiaogang's efforts and had been told that its harvests looked favorable. He promised to protect the village as long as its practice didn't spread.

Continued...




Jul. 26, 2004
Aug. 18, 2003
Aug. 19, 2002


QUICK LINKS: Introduction | Economics | Politics | Culture | Photoessays | Home


Copyright © 2006 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Subscribe to TIME | Customer Service | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases | Media Kit