TIME IN PRINT
Subscribe
TIME Asia
International Editions

Customer Service
FAQs
Contact Us

TIME Asia
TIME Asia Home
Current Issue
  Asia News
  Pacific News
  Technology
  Business
  Arts
  Travel
Photos
Special Features
Magazine Archive

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Service
About Us
Write to TIME Asia

TIME.com
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
Latest CNN News


Other News
TIME Digest
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Bookmark TIME
TIME Media Kit

Get TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter FREE!

TIME Asia Asiaweek Asia Now TIME Asia story
What Exactly Are "High Crimes and Misdemeanors"?

By JOHN CLOUD

In 1787, a few days before they finished writing the Constitution, the men working on it stumbled on an unresolved question: Under what circumstances should Congress be able to impeach the President? No doubt tired of parsing legalisms after months of work, they took only about five minutes to dispense with the constitutional crisis. They had already decided that treason and bribery were no-brainers--definitely grounds for impeachment--but George Mason of Virginia said he was concerned that those two crimes didn't capture "many great and dangerous offenses." So he suggested adding "maladministration" to the list of impeachable no-nos. When others complained that the term was too vague, he offered this legal delicacy: "other high crimes and misdemeanors."

It was a brilliant little piece of 18th century spin. The fusty phrase carried the weight of history even back then: it had been around since at least 1386, when Members of Parliament used it to describe the financial shenanigans of one Michael de la Pool. The phrase seemed to combine the right measure of breadth and gravity--not just any crimes, but the "high" ones. A quick vote was taken, the phrase was accepted, and now the President's fate rests on it.

The 18th century may have been a time when English common law was studied and revered, but at the end of the 20th, we're more familiar with TV's Judge Judy than with James Madison. "High crimes and misdemeanors" sounds like it could mean anything, from murder to jaywalking. And here's the rub--Mason's dirty little secret--it could mean anything. The Constitution gives the House of Representatives sole authority to decide what constitutes grounds for impeachment. That's why President Andrew Johnson was impeached in 1868, when a nasty political dispute got out of hand. (The Senate failed by a vote to convict him, and he stayed in office.)

PAGE 1  |  PAGE 2




Daily

September 21, 1998

COVER STORY
The Clinton presidency hangs in the balance

HIGH CRIMES?
The Constitution is vague

THE REPORT
Starr lays out a detailed--some would say prurient--case for impeachment

SCORECARD
Did the report go too far?

ON THE SIDELINES
Hillary is standing by her man, barely


This edition's table of contents | TIME Asia home



   LATEST HEADLINES:

   Click Here for the latest regional analysis from TIME Asia



SEARCH FOR :  

Back to the top   Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases