TIME IN PRINT
Subscribe
TIME Asia
International Editions

Customer Service
FAQs
Contact Us

TIME Asia
TIME Asia Home
Current Issue
  Asia News
  Pacific News
  Technology
  Business
  Arts
  Travel
Photos
Special Features
Magazine Archive

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Service
About Us
Write to TIME Asia

TIME.com
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
Latest CNN News


Other News
TIME Digest
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Bookmark TIME
TIME Media Kit

Get TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter FREE!

TIME Asia Asiaweek Asia Now TIME Asia story
ASIA
FEBRUARY 8, 1999 VOL. 153 NO. 5


Sure, We All Like to Be Honored
But writers who accept awards from those they criticize compromise their integrity
By SUNANDA K. DATTA-RAY

When Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk turned down the coveted title of "state artist" recently (if he accepted it, he said, he could not "look in the face of people" he cared about), I was reminded of a veteran leftist editor in New Delhi, Nikhil Chakravarty, who similarly declined an official decoration some years ago. To accept it and still claim independence, he said, would be "like wearing a chastity belt in a brothel."

Writers and journalists being essentially in the same boat, the question of whether our work should be rewarded--and, if so, how and by whom--provokes contrary views. Did Pamuk's claim that "the state does not have clean hands" mean all states, or are some cleaner than others? "If you accepted a prize from the White House during the Vietnam War," he went on, "that would of course have political implications." What about a White House that is not embroiled in foreign military adventure, hard though it is to imagine? The implication seems to be that some states are permanently taboo and others only sometimes. Not everyone is as squeamish. Mahatma Gandhi and India's Nobel laureate for literature Rabindranath Tagore, sturdy patriots both, received honors not just from the government but from a colonial government, returning them in fury only when the British indulged in a brutal display of force.

Media dynamics make for an additional anomaly. Press magnates seldom conceal their political loyalty; they openly campaign for their preferred party and no one thinks the less of them for being rewarded with titles or ambassadorships. Some British newspaper proprietors have even been offered Balkan crowns. But the editors and reporters who work for these committed moguls are generally seen--and see themselves--as incorruptible paragons of impartiality. Hence the frisson of disapproval that rippled the British media's favorite watering holes in 1981 when, as the wits said, Queen Elizabeth turned day into knight with a tap of her sword. The victim (or beneficiary) was television anchor Robin Day, distinctive as always in polka-dot bow tie and matching handkerchief, whose integrity had never previously been questioned. His knighthood may have paved the way for Margaret Thatcher later to shower honors on a host of supportive editors whose Asian equivalent is to be found in the Malaysian media's Tuns and Datuks.

PAGE 1  |  2



This edition's table of contents | TIME Asia home



   LATEST HEADLINES:

   Click Here for the latest regional analysis from TIME Asia



SEARCH FOR :  

Back to the top   Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases