TIME IN PRINT
Subscribe
TIME Asia
International Editions

Customer Service
FAQs
Contact Us

TIME Asia
TIME Asia Home
Current Issue
  Asia News
  Pacific News
  Technology
  Business
  Arts
  Travel
Photos
Special Features
Magazine Archive

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Service
About Us
Write to TIME Asia

TIME.com
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
Latest CNN News


Other News
TIME Digest
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Bookmark TIME
TIME Media Kit

Get TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter FREE!

TIME Asia Asiaweek Asia Now TIME Asia story
Nissan has been running out of gas since 1985, about the time Halberstam was writing. The company's U.S. sales that year topped 830,000, and the goal was to pass Toyota within a year. Nissan never came close. Its sales in the U.S. have shrunk some 25% since then, and the company has slid to a distant third, behind Toyota and Honda. The story is much the same in Asia. Now, nearly two years into Asia's slump, the automaker's share in Thailand has been almost halved, to 9%, despite major investments in new plants.

Nissan ignored supply and demand at home, too. In the late 1980s, management shelved a restructuring plan in hopes that the company's fortunes would be bolstered by the surging Japanese economy. When the bubble burst in the early 1990s, so did Nissan's profits. In 1993, the company took its first loss and two years later became the first car manufacturer to close a factory in Japan since the end of World War II. Last December, the government-run Japan Development Bank issued $708 million in loans to Nissan. That brought resounding criticism--and inevitable comparisons to Chrysler Corp., which was bailed out by the U.S. government with $1.2 billion worth of loan guarantees in 1980.

The stallout in the U.S. market is typical of Nissan's global difficulties. Last year just about anything with four wheels and a little styling moved off dealers' lots. Yet Nissan's sales dropped off 14.7%, and the company lost money. The firm's managers somehow forgot a golden rule in the auto business: profits are only as good as the last hot product in a fast-changing cycle. The Maxima, Nissan's flagship sedan since the 1980s, is a perennial critics' favorite, but even its fans say it needs a face-lift. So does the Infiniti luxury series. The Altima, Nissan's affordable sedan (about $17,000), is chubby, boring and no match for its nemesis, the Accord, or the new Volkswagen Jetta. This year Nissan's only brand-new offering is the Xterra sport utility vehicle. Hot, say critics, but alone. "They've tarnished their image," says Bill Seltenheim, an analyst with Autodata in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey. "Everyone knows if you want to buy a Nissan, all you have to do is wait for the next incentive program."

The problem: instead of allowing designers to work their magic, bureaucrats in Tokyo have been dictating, Henry Ford-like, what is good for the customer. The lesson, of course, is that in the 1920s Ford almost bankrupted his company that way. Says J. Ferron, one of the auto industry's leading consultants: "There have been times when nobody even bothered to ask whether green cars were selling before they were loaded onto ships."

PAGE 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5




Daily

March 8, 1999

Merger Mania
The deals will keep on coming

Viewpoint
Change is not entirely foreign to Japan


This edition's table of contents | TIME Asia home



   LATEST HEADLINES:

   Click Here for the latest regional analysis from TIME Asia



SEARCH FOR :  

Back to the top   Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases