The Battle for Hong Kong — page 2

Hotheads—and even pragmatic Hong Kong has some—are quick to say that Beijing's behavior in recent months has destroyed the "one country, two systems" formula or fatally undermined it. That's not the view one gets at the studios of Commercial Radio in the suburb of Kowloon Tong. Five mornings a week, an engineer cues the signature theme for Teacup in a Storm, Hong Kong's most-popular radio call-in show, and housewives, commuters and taxi drivers tune in religiously. Teacup was caught in a tempest of its own in May, when shock jock Albert Cheng resigned, saying he received threats for being so outspoken. His successor, Allen Lee, lasted barely three weeks before quitting for the same reason. But Teacup is still undeniably lively. Its topics are the big issues of the day: China's pressure tactics, "one country, two systems," the need for greater democracy. The 12 buttons on the telephone board are blinking incessantly as eager callers wait to get on the air. Says Peter Lam, co-host of the show for its entire nine-year run: "It is very difficult to shut Hong Kong up."

Teacup's topic this particular morning is by Lau Chin-shek, a labor unionist and champion of democracy who launched the recent campaign to befriend Beijing, saying it was time for "alternative" thinking and "big reconciliation." One of the buttons on the console blinks, the engineer patches the call through, and Legco member Szeto Wah comes on the air, giving Lau hell. Szeto, 73, is one of Beijing's least-favorite Hong Kong figures, and no wonder: his Alliance in Support of the Patriotic Democratic Movement in China demands the end of one-party rule in the country and organizes the annual memorial in Hong Kong for the victims of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. In a deep, clear voice, Szeto brands Lau, a fellow Alliance member, a traitor for cozying up to Beijing, and goes further: in terms of betrayal, Szeto fumes, Lau is like Judas and St. Peter combined.

But democrats like Lau say that's the only way forward. "If there's no change in the current relationship," Lau tells TIME, "there can be no movement toward democracy—because Beijing isn't going to budge first." This issue has developed into a kind of theological schism within the pro-democracy camp, both in principle and in planning for Legco's September election. At one time it looked like the democrats would do extremely well. (Although winning an actual majority is barely feasible: only half of the legislature's seats are directly elected from voting districts; the rest are chosen by mostly conservative trade and social groups such as bankers and property barons.) But the intervening months of brimstone from Beijing have changed that projection. Some politicians, fearing a voter backlash against anyone who confronts Beijing too loudly, now believe that a show of friendliness with the mainland is necessary if they don't want to frighten off voters—or get frozen out of Hong Kong politics. "No matter how big our differences," says Democratic Party founder Martin Lee, "there must be room for cooperation."

Others, of course, think this is mere mollycoddling. Lee Cheuk-yan is a former ally of Lau and his colleague in the Confederation of Trade Unions, but the two men are on the outs. "He believes that to push toward democracy, Hong Kong needs to improve relations with Beijing," says Lee as he leads a small rally of slogan-shouting, pro-democracy lifeguards in singlets and shorts to exhort people to march this week. (One of Hong Kong's lifeguards' unions is in Lee's confederation; the other is not, being pro-Beijing.) Lee thinks the democrats must stay united to give voters a clear choice. He suggests that Lau's tactic might backfire. "What he did is confusing people," says Lee. "The people on the street are really angry with him."

Meanwhile, on the other side of an even greater divide, a different group of politicians are deeply worried that voters are going to punish them in September: those who belong to pro-Beijing political parties. The biggest of these is the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong, or DAB. Since the handover, the DAB has positioned itself as a political "bridge" to the mainland, and that went down well with voters. The DAB currently holds 10 seats in Legco, compared with 22 for the democratic camp. But given Beijing's recent unpopularity in Hong Kong, the DAB admits it will be lucky not to lose any seats in September. Chairman Ma Lik predicts that if the voters are still as angry as they were last July "and they still believe that on the mainland the ruling Communist Party is suppressing people and there's no freedom, then that's going to be tough for us." Ma saw that anger last November in the lower-level District Council elections, when the DAB lost a third of its seats.

The paradox is that the DAB is known for both its support of China and its local work: of all the parties in Hong Kong, it has the largest and most-proactive grassroots organization. When residents want a bus-stop shelter in their neighborhood or help with housing-estate issues, the local DAB office is a good place to go. Christopher Chung, a district councilor in the eastern part of Hong Kong island, has worked hard for the 2,000 fishermen of Shau Kei Wan typhoon shelter; last year he helped get government loans for them to buy freezers for their boats. He calls the fishermen his "iron votes," and they've helped him get elected for 13 straight years as a local councilor. But Chung wants to take the step up to Legco this September. On a visit to the typhoon shelter to drum up support—chatting with fishermen mending nets and smoking tobacco from homemade bamboo bongs—Chung admits that the mood is against him. "I have no chance," he says. No matter what he's done for the constituents, his party's closeness to Beijing is an inescapable albatross. "I don't think the DAB is finished," he continues, "but we will have to wait until our platform is more in line with public opinion." Running for re-election to his current job isn't a problem. But Legco is different: that election isn't about freezers or boat loans. It's about the big things. Hong Kong. China. Democracy.

A year after finding a political voice—and then ending up in a new relationship with Beijing—Hong Kong is searching for the center. Lau, the legislator compared to Judas, used interesting language when he explained why he decided to get conciliatory with China's leaders. "I have to make a judgment on the crucial question: Does Beijing want to rock the boat of Hong Kong? If the answer is yes, you only have two choices. You can either pack up and go, or put up a big fight." But Lau concluded that Beijing didn't want to rock Hong Kong's boat if it didn't have to, and that the best way forward was to find common ground. The pro-reconciliation camp hopes that Beijing will allow some of the banned democrats to visit the mainland and start some kind of dialogue. Then, perhaps, matters of substance can be discussed down the line, such as changes to the way Legco is elected, or how the territory's Chief Executive is chosen (he is currently appointed by a Beijing-picked congress).

Skeptics say this vague road map assumes too much flexibility from Beijing. "Dialogue won't come before the September election," scoffs Yeung Sum, chairman of the Democratic Party. "That's part of Beijing's scheme to swing support away from the democrats. It's all about political muscle." Shiu Sin-por of the One Country Two Systems Research Institute adds that Beijing has scant interest in forging a better relationship with Hong Kong's feistier democrats, who it believes are "trying to subvert the central government."

Bishop Zen gets angry at any such charges of subversion and disloyalty. "We have done nothing wrong," he insists, saying Hong Kong people shouldn't be expected to "kneel down to implore for understanding" from Beijing. Zen continues, "If you suppose that what they have done comes really from a monolithic leadership from Beijing, then it's useless to fight back." But he remains more upbeat, taking solace from moderate statements on Hong Kong not only by Zeng but by President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao. "If you still have hope that there are much more open-minded people in the leadership, then it is useful to make them understand the real situation." In other words, Hong Kong has to get its true feelings out—as loudly as possible—and the truth might set it free.

Ray Au, the district councilor in Tai Po, sees the fight on a much lower and nastier level. Last week Au received a call in the middle of the night from the security department at the Tai Wo Estate, informing him of a fire at his office. When he arrived there at 3 a.m., he found that an arsonist had torched several posters on the outside wall and left behind a gas cylinder, which had fortunately not been ignited. But a message was scrawled in blue Magic Marker on the front wall: "All Chinese traitors must die." The bullies are turning into bad guys, and Au says backing down from them is no longer an option. "If we stop now, there is no hope for Hong Kong people."

Reported by Chaim Estulin, Neil Gough and Carmen Lee/Hong Kong

1 | 2

	Hong Kong's Defiance [Jun. 14, 2004] China warns the city to forget democracy and get back to business. But many Hong Kongers aren't listening Viewpoint: "Trust Us" [Jun. 14, 2004] Hong Kong wants good governance, not independence, writes Anson Chan Shocked Jocks [May 25, 2004] Hong Kong's incendiary political climate claims another outspoken radio host Who's in Charge Of Hong Kong? [Apr. 09, 2004] To the dismay of democracy advocates, China is tightening its control over the territory More Related Items | Search all issues of TIME Magazine