TIME Asia
TIME Asia Home
Current Issue
  Asia News
  Pacific News
  Technology
  Business
  Arts
  Travel
Photos
Special Features
Magazine Archive

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Service
About Us
Write to TIME Asia

TIME.com
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
Latest CNN News


Other News
TIME Digest
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Bookmark TIME
TIME Media Kit

Get TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter FREE!

TIME AsiaAsiaweekAsia NowTIME Asia story

JANUARY 17, 2000 VOL. 155 NO. 2


China Pictorial
DNA research contradicts theories, based on the "Peking Man" fossil, that hold Chinese to be the earliest modern humans.

Rewriting Prehistory
A team of researchers concludes that Chinese, like everyone else, came out of Africa
By ANTHONY SPAETH

According to ancient tradition, the Chinese were savages until a sage came along and taught them how to construct shelters. Later wise men taught, in succession, the use of fire, music and the cultivation of crops. The last of these sages was the Yellow Emperor Huangdi, the father of Chinese civilization. That tale, from the first century B.C., suggests that the process of human evolution took place in China--a notion that was boosted by the celebrated discovery in 1921 of Peking Man, a Homo erectus fossil unearthed outside Beijing. That led to claims, believed for decades in China, that Chinese were the earliest modern humans.

These days, the claims are getting a rough shaking from hard science--as is the notion that the Chinese are a unique, indigenous race. The Chinese Human Genome Diversity Project, a collaboration among 12 researchers from seven institutions, scrutinized DNA samples from 28 of China's 56 ethnic groups and then compared the samples with genetic material from other Asian and non-Asian groups. Their verdict: Chinese--like the rest of humanity--evolved in Africa. They migrated eastward along the Indian Ocean and made their way to China via Southeast Asia. "It is now safe to conclude," reported the researchers, "that modern humans originating in Africa constitute the majority of the current gene pool in Asian populations."

    ALSO IN TIME
Cover: Up From the Apes
Remarkable new evidence is filling in the story of how we became human

Rewriting Prehistory
A team of researchers concludes that Chinese, like everyone else, came out of Africa

Tibet: Thunder Out of China
One of Tibet's holiest figures flees Beijing's control and slips across the border to be with the Dalai Lama

India: Fallout from Flight 814
The aftermath of the Indian Airlines hijacking suggests that tension over Kashmir is getting worse

Who Was That Special Passenger?
As clashes between Muslims and Christians escalate in the far-flung Moluccas, many wonder if anyone's in charge in Jakarta

Indonesia: Chaos in the Islands
Little did the hijackers know that one of the hostages sitting in economy class could have effortlessly written them a check for $200 million

Japan: Fighting for Wartime Retribution
Asians who toiled as slave laborers for Imperial Japan sue their corporate abusers

Thailand: Nothing to Trumpet About
Starving in the villages, unwelcome in the cities, Thailand's hard-working national symbol, the elephant, has no place to call home

The project was inspired by similar research done in the mid-1980s at the University of California at Berkeley, where geneticists analyzed DNA from a range of ethnic groups and concluded that Homo sapiens descended from a common ancestral parent, whom they dubbed "Eve," living in Africa 200,000 years back.

The Chinese researchers, led by Shanghai-born Jin Li, a professor at the Human Genetics Center at the University of Texas in Houston, studied genetic markers known as microsatellites, which are short segments of DNA known to change rapidly and distinctively over time. By comparing DNA microsatellites from Chinese, East Asian, African and other races, they came up with an evolutionary pedigree and even a time frame for various DNA alterations. Their theory is that modern humans entered China from the south 40,000 to 60,000 years ago.

That contradicts old theories revolving around Peking Man. The Homo erectus specimen, discovered in the Zhoukoudian cave in the suburbs of Beijing, is estimated to have lived 500,000 years ago; Homo erectus was the precursor to Homo sapiens. Peking Man's discovery made possible the idea that the missing link between the two species evolved in China--which the genetic theory flatly rejects.

But laboratory evidence isn't everything, according to Wu Xinzhi, professor at the Chinese Academy of the Sciences' Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing, who is one of China's foremost scholars on early humans. The septuagenarian Wu has conducted decades of research into the issue of early Chinese humans and says there are many strong challenges to the theory, which was first released in 1998. If Homo sapiens migrated to China, Wu says, he would have brought more advanced tools, similar to those found in Middle Eastern excavations. With one exception, no such tools have been found.

Wu plucks a skull specimen from a bookshelf of his Beijing office and ticks off the distinctive features of the various prehistoric Homo sapiens skeletons unearthed in China: "Their face is comparatively flat, their nose is flat, the upper front teeth are shovel-shaped." Up to 90% of modern Chinese have such facial features, he says. "If I stand at the gate of the United Nations building," says Wu, "I can correctly identify a Mongolian, a European, an African. Why?" His contention: the theory that Homo sapiens migrated outward from Africa may be true in Europe, but China went through a different evolutionary process. "The theory is definitely wrong in China," he insists. "For the modern human origins in China and the Oriental region, continuity is the main trend and hybridization (immigrants interbreeding with indigenous people) is subsidiary."

Wu admits he's no geneticist but he says Jin and his team should "pay more attention to hard materials, not just soft ones." He also concedes that paleontologists have yet to unearth any Homo sapiens remains older than 50,000 years, which lends credence to the genetic theory. The government is allocating more money in the search for such evidence. "But its main interest," says Wu, "is in earlier remains--earlier than 2 million years." Such remains might cast light on earlier evolution, but if China wants to prove that humans evolved uniquely on its soil, it will have to cast its net closer in time--and find the missing evidence.

Reported by Jaime A. FlorCruz/Beijing

This edition's table of contents
TIME Asia home




Quick Scroll: More stories from TIME, Asiaweek and CNN

   LATEST HEADLINES:

   Click Here for the latest regional analysis from TIME Asia



SEARCH FOR :  

Back to the top   Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases