|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
MARCH 20, 2000 VOL. 155 NO. 11
Partisans of both the extreme right and extreme left are already sharpening their knives in anticipation of Clinton's visit. Both sides view the economic reforms India has instituted over the past decade as a sellout to multinational corporations. True, left-leaning parties are no longer a major force in Indian politics. But even the Congress party, for want of a better platform, has begun to take up the populist cry. Although the Congress started the reform process in the early '90s, the party now opposes cuts in government subsidies and is against further opening of the economy, arguing that domestic industry and agriculture need to be protected. As for the Hindu nationalist right, the front-burner issue is the U.S. President's belated decision to include Islamabad in this itinerary. Many pundits in Delhi (and Washington, for that matter) feel the stopover will legitimize the military regime of General Pervez Musharraf. Hawks in and out of the government had earlier warned of a public stink in India if Clinton made the swing to Pakistan. Now that this leg is confirmed, Delhi has begun the process of damage control. The latest Indian spin: a few hours' stopover in Pakistan (compared with the whole day Clinton is spending in Bangladesh) is actually an insult to Islamabad. Beyond that, India's hawks argue that it is time America spelled out its new priorities in the subcontinent. Without the Soviet Union as a threat, U.S. interests surely lie more with democratic India than with Pakistan--Washington's former bulwark against communist expansion in the region. During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the CIA worked hand in glove with its Pakistani counterpart, ISI, to set up weapons-supply lines to the mujahedin guerrillas. Now these cold war networks are helping to arm Kashmir and, in some cases, arm those elsewhere who oppose U.S. interests. Clinton clearly wants to play peacemaker in Kashmir, an area he has already described as one of the most dangerous flashpoints in the world. From the Indian point of view, however, this is unacceptable. Delhi regards Kashmir as a bilateral concern. Any attempt to broker a peace or to twist arms on the nuclear-testing issue could meet with disaster. Clinton's visit, therefore, is unlikely to score any major diplomatic coup. There is likely to be some good news on the investment front. Clinton will travel with a large business delegation, and several agreements--joint ventures, big private investments--will no doubt be announced. But the most lasting success within Clinton's grasp would be to leave behind a feel-good factor in the India-U.S. relationship. With its tradition of hospitality, India is rolling out the red carpet. The Bombay Stock Exchange, which Clinton is scheduled to visit, has been given a facelift. The approach to the Taj Mahal in Agra has been spruced up at a cost of nearly $1 million. The bottom line is that, while it is difficult to imagine anything substantial emerging from Clinton's visit, he will surely conquer more hearts--and in a more seemly fashion--than his 19th-century predecessor. Parthasarathi Swami is a businessman and Internet journalist in Bombay Write to TIME at mail@web.timeasia.com TIME Asia home Quick Scroll: More stories from TIME, Asiaweek and CNN
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to the top |
Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases |