|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 VOL. 156 NO. 11
I was more excited than scared. The procedure wasn't painful. It was over in 10 minutes. It was worse for my husband, who followed it close-up on a TV monitor and said it was almost as bad as watching my caesarean. I went home, took a nap, woke upand could see the clock across the room. At the doctor's the next day, I was seeing 20/20 with my left eye, 20/40 with my right. But instead of getting better, my vision worsened. I was told my corneas were extremely dry, and I should apply artificial tears every couple of hours. Then the surgeon was consulted; he suggested I use the drops more often, about every 15 minutes. This wasn't especially practical for a working journalist with two kids, but I tried to stick to the schedule. It didn't do the trick. Next we tried plugging my tear ducts (outgoing, not incoming) to keep my eyes moist. I switched doctors, and allowed the new one to cauterize my ducts shut. Still not much change. My eyes are wetter, and I'm using artificial tears less frequently, but my vision hasn't improved correspondingly. And that's where things stand now, 10 months since the surgery. The doctors keep saying they're confident of solving this problembut they also say my experience is extremely unusual (one of them says he's never seen this in anyone else), so their confidence is less than inspiring. Two other doctors I consulted said there was nothing wrong surgically, and they too think my condition will get better. I hope so. But while I'm waiting, here's the worst part: my vision now can't be improved, except marginally, with glasses. The problem is on the surface of my eye, which isn't what lenses correct. One doctor likens it to scratches on the crystal of a watch. Some days I'm pretty sure my story will have a happy ending. At other times, though, I look at my children, ages four-and-a-half and two years, and wonder if I'll ever see them in crisp focus again. I'm devastated that reading is now often more a chore than a pleasure, especially in the evening. I need far more light to make things out. I avoid driving in unfamiliar terrain, especially at night, because I can't read road signs until I'm on top of them. I'm constantly testing myself. Can I read that ad on the other side of the subway car? Can I see that license plate in front of me? How hard is it to read the daily Hotline on the Internet? It's great that most people who have had this procedure feel like lottery winners and I hope that I can join them soon. But my new doctor is spending an increasing amount of time with patients, most of them referred by other doctors, who are having post-LASIK problems. If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't. Still, I understand the lure of that pot of gold, the promise of a lifelong wish granted. So to those who feel they have to join this mostly happy club, I can't say don't. Just make the decision with eyes wide open. Write to TIME at mail@web.timeasia.com TIME Asia home Quick Scroll: More stories from TIME, Asiaweek and CNN
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to the top |
Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases |