|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
JANUARY 8, 2001 VOL. 157 NO. 1
Election season can be a dangerous, dark time in Thailand. This year, a powerful anti-graft commission is challenging politics as usual By ROBERT HORN Buriram ALSO Nowhere to Hide The watchdogs try to clean things up Lawyers. guns. money. It must be campaign season again in Buriram. The province, one of Thailand's poorest, routinely becomes its most violent at election time. Panawat Liangpongpan, a Democrat candidate for parliament, has the scars to prove it. As he readies himself for a day's campaigning, he tucks a 9-mm Walther semiautomatic pistol into his back pocket, straps on a Kevlar bulletproof vest and, leaving nothing to chance, rubs his hands over the three Buddhist amulets hanging from his neck. Panawat is not paranoid, just experienced: in December of '99, he took four bullets in his back. Asked why he was shot, Panawat replies: "Politics." When the gunman was captured, he told police he had been hired by Thaweesak Chidchob, a member of a prominent family of well-connected businessmen and politicians. He hasn't been apprehended. Thais have become cynically accustomed to such brazen displays of gangster politics. Electoral power in Thailand has long emanated from the barrels of guns and the wallets of well-heeled businessmen, rather than from genuine debate over issues and the national interest. An estimated $1.2 billion was spentmuch of it on vote buyingduring the previous national election in 1996: more than what was spent on that year's U.S. presidential campaign. Provincial businessmen and godfathers tend to buy their way into parliament where they recoup their investments through graft. While the politicians loot government programs and private banks, the gulf between rich and poor has become the widest in Asia. "They rob our treasury. They rob our land," says General Saiyud Kerdphol, chairman of PollWatch, an independent election-monitoring group. "They rob everything, and they never get caught."
But Thaksin himself is now damaged goods, a victim of the very anticorruption movement he has supported. Last week, Thailand's National Counter Corruption Commission, empowered by a new reform constitution to investigate politicians, resoundingly smacked down politics as usual by charging Thaksin with deliberately submitting a false declaration of assets in 1997 when he was No. 2 in the government. The tycoon, the commission said, stashed millions of dollars in stocks under the names of his maid, driver and security guard to conceal ownership of 17 companies, avoid paying taxes and manipulate share prices. The penalty is a five-year ban from politics. Choking back tears, Thaksin insisted: "I will be the next Prime Minister." He has vowed to continue to run for office while appealing to the Constitutional Court, dismissing calls to spare the country the likely spectacle of a Prime Minister on trial. His odds aren't greatto date, the court has upheld every one of the commission's findings. (His case may be bolstered, how-ever, by last week's resignation of Preeya Kasemsant na Ayutthaya, the counter corruption commissioner who had recommended that Thaksin be indicted. Preeya admitted to incorrectly declaring her own assets.) The commission is also investigating several ministers in Chuan's government. Even the Prime Minister was probed for possibly concealing parts of his stock portfolio, though he was cleared. Another new watchdog body, the Election Commission, is flexing its muscles: it has already disqualified three parliamentary candidates for vote buying and will surely ban scores more for offenses like doling out cash and other goodies for votes; spending over the campaign limit; and using violence or intimidation to sway voters. "There has never been anything like this," says former Prime Minister Anand Panyarachun, who helped draft a 1997 constitution that created the two institutions. "It's a completely new chapter in our history." Not everyone likes the changesparticularly the privileged beneficiaries of the old system who argue that reforms will bring chaos. Many businessmen are calling for a "timeout" for democracy, while some politicians warn that the watchdog bodies are dangerously overreaching. Korn Dabbaransi, leader of the Chart Pattana Party, contends that if the Election Commission issues so many "red cards," or disqualifications, that the overall outcome is altered, it could spark a coup d'état. It's not an idle fear: in late November, army commander in chief General Surayud Chulanont revealed that some officers were indeed advocating a power grab to forestall what they see as a tainted election that will only produce another corrupt and ineffective government. Surayud should know. As the most reform-minded army chief Thailand has had, the general has launched his own offensive to weed out corrupt, criminal and coup-plotting soldiers. He now surrounds himself around the clock with a detail of commandos to thwart assassination attempts. Despite efforts to clean up the system, the election has been plagued with the sort of bullets and baht politics that have long been synonymous with Thai elections. Last year, 43 politicians, canvassers and bureaucrats were shot dead nationwide. In violence-wracked Buriram, near the Cambodian border, campaign workers and monitors have been abducted, and sales of bullets have more than doubled since campaigning began. Niran Kultanan, president of the Buriram chapter of PollWatch, now varies his routine each day so that any hitmen would have a harder time tracking him down. "The violence will get worse as voting day draws near," he predicts. In some areas, to be sure, reform is making a difference. In Nakhom Phanom, near the Laos frontier, border patrol police acting on a tipoff last month pulled over a campaign convoy belonging to former Prime Minister Chavalit Yongchaiyudh's New Aspiration Party. In the glove compartment of a pickup truck they found 100,000 baht (about $2,300) in 500-baht notes stuffed inside envelopes on each of which was written the name of a local candidate. Chavalit, who still wields tremendous influence over the police and military, was furious when the arresting officer refused to take his phone call. (He contended that the money wasn't for buying votes but to pay for vehicle rentals used in his campaign.) And the scandals have hit more than just old-guard par-ties like Chavalit's. A Democrat has been red-carded, while an Australian Broadcasting Corp. TV crew caught Thaksin's party handing out cash. "You can change the laws, but changing the political culture will take a lot longer," says former Prime Minister Anand. Still, this week's election offers some hope that Thailand is becoming more and more of a legitimate parliamentary democracy. Politicians who buy elections and abuse power to plunder the nation now face a harsh legal reckoning. "For the first time, our politicians are afraid," says Dr. Prawase Wasi, a well-known social activist who led the 1997 campaign for the constitution to establish the watchdog bodies and provide for recourse against corrupt officials. "When it comes to corruption, there is finally real hope," says economist Ammar Siamwalla. "The battle has been joined." It's a battle that's far from over, but the reformers are shaking things up.
Write to TIME at mail@web.timeasia.com TIME Asia home Quick Scroll: More stories from TIME, Asiaweek and CNN
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to the top |
Copyright © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Subscribe to TIME | FAQ | About TIME Asia | Search | Write to Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Press Releases |