|
Can Anyone Govern This Place? By Romesh Ratnesar The opening act of Gulf War II did not proceed according to the Pentagon's carefully scripted blueprint: to begin with a rapid push of ground troops, followed by a massive air assault designed to "shock and awe" the enemy into submission. That plan was pre-empted because of an intelligence bonanza that could have delivered the knockout punch before the opening bell. Acting on fresh information that came in hours before the deadline the U.S. President had set for Saddam to give up power, George W. Bush ordered U.S. forces to strike the Baghdad bunker where Saddam was believed to be sleeping. Just before dawn Thursday, March 20, three dozen Tomahawk missiles outfitted with 1,000-lb. warheads were unleashed from sIX warships in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea and slammed into three buildings in Baghdad. Shortly after the missiles found their marks, a pair of U.S. f117 fighters dropped four 2,000-lb. bunker-busting bombs on an underground facility believed to be housing Saddam and at least one of his two ruthless sons Qusay and Uday.
U.S. military officials told TIME that the barrage obliterated its intended targets and almost certainly killed some if not many of the key Iraqi leaders believed to be huddling inside. In the wake of the U.S. strike, Iraqi television broadcast what it claimed was a live statement from Saddam that purported to show he had survived. Some viewers wondered whether the haggard, bespectacled figure was actually the dictator or one of his body doubles, though intelligence experts concluded that it was probably Saddam. Still, that did not rule out the possibility that the speech may have been previously taped. Iraqi forces responded to the U.S. strike by setting several oil wells on fire and lobbing missiles toward allied troops massing on the border. Though none hit their target, the Iraqi missiles were enough to unnerve many of the U.S. forces, which were gearing up to begin their invasion on Friday, March 21. The haphazard nature of Iraq's response convinced Pentagon officials that the U.S. strike had succeeded in creating a power vacuum inside the Iraqi military command, cutting links between Baghdad and its forces in the field. But the possibility that those forces would panic, firing off more weapons and sabotaging southern oil fields, persuaded the U.S. commanders to begin the ground war on Thursday, 24 hours ahead of schedule. It didn't seem to matter. Whatever enemy resistance the allies expected to face on their first push into Iraq was gone by the time they got there. On Friday, as called for in the original plan, the U.S. finally delivered the "shock and awe," pulverizing targets in Baghdad and positions scattered throughout the country with a barrage of bombs dropped from hundreds of planes, as well as Tomahawks fired from 30 warships. By then, the Iraqi will to fight was weakening across southern Iraq. Close to 10,000 Iraqi troops surrendered in the first three days of conflict. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
DRIVE TOWARD BAGHDAD In a departure from plan, U.S. and British ground troops began the push into Iraq on Thursday, March 20, ahead of the touted "shock-and-awe" air campaign. A convoy of tanks, armored bulldozers and personnel carriers cut a swath through the south, along the way meeting both pockets of resistance and surrendering Iraqi soldiers. Leaders of the Iraqi 51st Mechanized Division surrendered their troops. Forces secured Umm Qasr, the Faw peninsula, the southern oil fields and Nasiriyah. SHOCK AND AWE Central Command's promised air show began with a barrage of bombs that rained on central Baghdad Friday night, March 21. Over the following nights, thousands of cruise missiles and other guided bombs leveled the Planning Ministry, two presidential palaces and many other key government buildings. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The decision to target Saddam directly in the war's first hours reflected the White House's determination to seize the offensive after weeks of humbling diplomatic rebuffs, cemented by the U.N. Security Council's refusal to back the war. Like so many other diplomatic texts, U.N. Resolution 1441 turned out to have enough ambiguities in it to mean all things to all men. The French insist that they understood the resolution allowed some time for inspections to work. "Maybe sIX months, maybe 12, maybe 18," says a top aide to French President Jacques Chirac. Every time Saddam did somethingaccept the weapons inspectors back, provide a report on his weaponsthe French saw it as proof that inspections were working. The Americans, by contrast, saw it as continued Iraqi obstruction.
Meanwhile, to save his skin in federal elections, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder came out against military action in Iraq under any circumstances. With Germany set to take a seat on the U.N. Security Council in January, Paris would no longer be facing the Americans alone. On Jan. 14, Chirac said France's position on the need to continue with inspections was "identical" to Germany's. SIX days later, on Martin Luther King Day, Dominique de Villepin, the French Foreign Minister, dropped his own bomb. France, he said, thought that "nothing justifies envisaging military action." It was the plainest signal possible that so long as the inspectors were getting cooperation from Saddam, Paris would not support a war. Though it was not clear at the time, the attempt to build a unified international position on Iraq died that day.
Historians will long debate whether the road to war in Iraq could have been handled a different wayand ask if the U.N. could have formed a united front against Saddam, as it did in Gulf War I. But perhaps unity was an impossible dream. Only one nationthe U.S.has suffered the thousands of deaths that a few people with a deep hatred could inflict. "I do think 9/11 is a historic watershed," Vice President Dick Cheney told nbc News last week. The U.S., he said, was worried that the next attack on its territory "could involve far deadlier weapons than the world has ever seen. The rest of the world hasn't had to come to grips with that yet."
-from TIME, March 31, 2003
Questions
1.Why did Pentagon leaders decide to launch the ground attack on Iraq earlier than planned?
2. Why did France and Germany oppose the war?