THE WAR IN IRAQ
PERSON OF THE YEAR
The American Soldier: Defender of Freedom
THE WAR IN IRAQ
"We Got Him"

WORKSHEET:
The Capture of Saddam

The Insurgent and the Soldier

If At First You Don't Succeed...

Losing Hearts and Minds

The Politics of War
WORLD
MIDDLE EAST
A Different Road Map
NUCLEAR THREATS
What Will Make Them Stop?

WORKSHEET:
Interpreting Maps and Charts
THE NOBEL PRIZE
"She Is Very Brave"

WORKSHEET:
The Prize for Peace
NATION
ELECTION 2004
How We're Divided Over George W. Bush...
and What That Says About Us

Operation February
CONGRESS
Spending Spree
SOCIETY
The Five Meanings of Arnold

Lights Out

No-Call: On Hold
BUSINESS
Now Hiring!
SCIENCE
Running Out of Energy

Inside the Food Labs

WORKSHEET:
Current Events in Review

Answers
 
WORLD

A Different Road Map


By Matt Rees/Jerusalem

Fed up with the fighting, a group of self-nominated Israelis and Palestinians decided to see what kind of peace plan they could negotiate. What they unveiled in Geneva with some ceremony last week reflected common sense in its substance. But politically it was the diplomatic equivalent of a high-tech start-up–full of media hype but little guarantee of success. Some Israelis and Palestinians alike were appalled that unelected delegates should negotiate when the two sides are essentially at war. Palestinian refugees said the plan would eliminate their "right of return" to homes inside Israel, while many Israelis rejected the idea of a deal that did not force Palestinians to renounce that very right. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called the Geneva peace plan a "historic mistake," and the West Bank leader of Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat's Fatah Party, Hussein Sheikh, rejected the signatories.

The accord's negotiators argue, however, that this is an important start, that someone had to present an alternative to the violent stalemate of the intifadeh and Sharon's response. Israeli peaceniks, led by former Justice Minister Yossi Beilin, said the proposal is helping Israel reignite debate over substance, which could force the Sharon government to soften its obstructionist policies. The Palestinian delegation said it represents the first serious solution Palestinians and Israelis have accepted.

The problem lies less with the content of the proposal than with its implementation. Arafat responded with limited approval, perhaps because he wants to appear to be a man of peace and thus annoy Sharon. The Israeli Prime Minister has been vehement in his condemnation of the plan. The Bush Administration, meanwhile, seems to be lending support to Geneva only as a means of pressuring both sides into pushing ahead with Washington's idled road-map peace plan.

—from TIME, December 15, 2003

Questions

1. Why were some Israelis and Palestinians appalled by this unofficial peace plan?

2. How have Israeli and Palestinian leaders reacted to the plan?

TIME CLASSROOM

Top