MICHELLE LITVIN FOR TIME 
Lu Dayment hangs out with her husband Rich and two of their three children



Making Time For a Baby
For years, women have been told they could wait until 40 or later to have babies. But a new book argues that¹s way too late

The Cost of Starting Families
For those who choose to have children early in life, the trade-off may involve more than just money

The Limits of Science
The more doctors have to intervene to get sperm to meet egg, the greater the chance that something will go wrong


 Gallery: Moms Before 30
 Graphic: Infertility Treatments


Are U.S. women waiting too long to have children?
Yes
No




Making Babies 
Remarkable insights into the mating dance of sperm and egg
9/30/91
The New Revolution 
A host of breakthroughs could transform the treatment of infertility, but tampering with nature can be risky
12/1/97
Search the Archive: Coverage of fertility issues from 1985-2002


Fertility of American Women
Data from the U.S. Census Bureau

Resolve
The national infertility organization

National Partnership for Women and Families
Official site of this advocacy group

The American Infertility Association
Information-rich site dedicated to reproductive health issues


E-mail your letter to the editor

THE RESUME GAP
It's a universal conundrum for mothers in their 20s: the best years for having children coincide with the best years for establishing a career. Hewlett suggests "backward mapping": decide what you want from life by a certain age, and plan backward from there. Easier said than done, perhaps, but not for Leah Halpern, 27, of Hillsdale, N.J. Determined not to end up "a 35-year-old assistant," she took a big pay cut to move from Vanity Fair to a smaller magazine before having her baby, so she could get the more elevated job title she will need on her résumé when she goes back to work.

But the isolation and condescension "nonworking" moms face in a career-woman's world ("Oh, you stay at home! And what else do you do?") can be especially hard on women who don't have a long list of work accomplishments behind them. And taking an early break is tougher in some fields than in others. For Susan Stevens, 30, a mother of three in Birmingham, Ala., plans to have children early meant deciding to become a teacher rather than a doctor. "I'd be 30 before I was finished with medical school," she says. (She ended up leaving teaching with the birth of her second child.) Former fashion designer Daisy von Furth, 33, of Northampton, Mass., dropped her X-Girl clothing line after having her son Wolfie when she was 26. Von Furth is enjoying stay-at-home motherhood but says going back into the fashion business probably wouldn't be an option, even if she wanted to. "You've jumped off the career train at a certain point," she says. "How can you come back at 36 or 37 and say, 'I'm here, guys — snap, snap, let me start another line of hip-hop clothing'?"

Some women, however, see a "baby sabbatical" as a chance to define what they want out of work, like Lu Dayment, 46, of Indianapolis, who had three kids in her 20s and at 35 went to graduate school in library science. "It took me a while to figure out what I wanted to do when I grew up," she says. Others take time off but maintain close connections to their former jobs, to ease their even-tual re-entry into the working world-or simply to avoid going insane after reading The Very Hungry Caterpillar for the 2,000th time. A former saleswoman in the distribution department at the movie studio DreamWorks, Gioconda Mitas, 31, was the first of her work friends to have a baby, three years ago. Once a week, she dresses up and drives from suburban Granada Hills, Calif., to have lunch with three former co-workers and pump them for office dirt. "What I miss most about working is the feeling that I have something that is mine-a desk, an area that belongs only to me ... I know I'm important in my son's life, but at DreamWorks I was also valued. I miss that."

RAVES TO RATTLES
In a society that fetishizes fun yet also equates career with identity, young moms are double outsiders. It can be isolating to feel your old cronies are living the Sex and the City life while you're stuck on Yes, Dear. But if their childless, swinging friends see them as old before their time, older moms-especially in communities where putting children on hold for career is common-can look down on younger women as babies with babies. Single mom Kim Howell, 25, of Oak Park, Ill., finds she can't go clubbing as often now that she has a three-year-old; her friends "can't understand that I can't stay out till 4 a.m. every Monday." Yet Howell, a restaurant server-manager, also has little in common with the older, upper-middle-class moms at her daughter's preschool. "Some of them look at me funny because I'm young," Howell says, "but it doesn't bother me. I'm proud of my daughter." And, she adds, "when my daughter is 18, I'll be only 40."

THE PAYOFF
Yet for all these costs, many of our young moms believe they did right by themselves and their children. Young parents, they say, have certain intangible advantages money can't buy. They have greater energy to keep up with young kids and can look forward to a longer empty-nest life. In addition to the reduced risk of running into fertility problems, some moms say they're glad they took the physical beating of pregnancy and labor while still in their more resilient 20s.

Babies cost you dearly, no doubt about it. And earlier in life is when you have the least, literally, to spend. But, as Jane Collyer notes, young mothers have more of one important asset in the bank: life itself. "You know what the best part is?" she asks. "I really hope I'll get to see my great-grandchildren. I don't want not to be able to lift [my grandchildren] up because I'm going to throw out my back. I know I'm thinking way far ahead, but I love my kids so much, and I know they're going to have great kids."

Reported by Cathy Booth Thomas/Dallas; Wendy Cole and Maggie Sieger/Chicago; Jeanne McDowell/Los Angeles; Collette McKenna Parker/Atlanta; Sarah Sturmon Dale/Minneapolis and Deirdre van Dyk/New York

1 | 2


Get the Magazine - Try 4 Issues Risk-Free! | Search the Archive


advertisement

QUICK LINKS: Cover Story | Cost of Starting Families | Limits of Science | Moms Before 30 | Infertility Treatments


FROM THE APRIL 15, 2002 ISSUE OF TIME MAGAZINE; POSTED SUNDAY, APRIL 7, 2002

 © 2002 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
FAQ | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use