
|

|
Making Sense of Iran
How did the current protests begin?
Although they may reflect the political coming-of-age of the generation
that has grown up amid the tribulations and conflicts of Iran's
20-year Islamic revolution, the immediate spark that set off the
student protests was a ban on the pro-reform newspaper Salam. Moderate
reformer President Mohammed Khatami has ushered in greater press
freedom as part of his drive to democratize Iran, which conservatives
are determined to stop. Banning a pro-Khatami newspaper was a shot
across the bow of the reformers, and a few hundred students began
demonstrating against the ban to show their support for Khatami's
reforms. Then, on July 8, police and militant conservatives tried
to snuff out the protests by storming dormitories at Tehran University
and beating students, one of whom was killed. That brought thousands
of students out onto the streets of the capital, and despite beatings
by riot police and threats by the authorities, the protest movement
quickly grew into a nationwide challenge to the strictures imposed
by Iran's conservative religious leaders.
Who really rules in Iran?
The
Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khameini, holds ultimate executive
power and controls the security forces. He is a lifetime appointee
of the Council of Experts, a body of 85 religious-political leaders
created after the 1979 revolution. Khameini is a conservative, determined
to maintain the principle of clerical rule. His allies, led by Speaker
Ali Akbar Nateq-Nouri, also dominate the 270-seat Majlis (parliament).
The
conservatives are being challenged by moderate reformers led by
President Mohammed Khatami. The presidency is an elected position,
and Iran's voters stunned the conservative clergy in 1997 by choosing
Khatami by 69 percent over conservative Nateq-Nouri. That set up
a fierce power struggle between moderates who want to democratize
Iran and limit arbitrary rule by religious appointees (as well as
improve ties with the international community) and conservatives
determined to cling to their power. Khameini's conservatives remain
more powerful than Khatami's allies within the structures of the
state, but public opinion appears to overwhelmingly favor the reformers.
Parliamentary elections next year and presidential elections in
2001 will be crucial battles in their power struggle.
Iran holds elections, but is it a democracy?
No,
but there are elements of democracy in its system that moderates
have used to press for greater democratization. Iran is formally
a theocracy, which has made Islamic Sharia the basis of its legal
system and in which politicized clergy hold executive power. But
its president and parliament are elected, although not exactly freely.
All candidates for public office (as well as all laws passed by
the Majlis) are vetted by a Council of Guardians appointed by the
Supreme Leader, and those deemed opposed to the principles of the
1979 revolution are excluded. The relatively liberal Khatami passed
muster because he is a cleric and a veteran of the revolution, and
is able to couch his arguments for greater democratization and the
rule of law within the discourse of Islamic revolution. Khatami
and his allies believe there are sufficient democratic openings
to work within the system for reform. But the student demonstrators
may not have the patience for Khatami's gradualism.
Iran
and the West a pariah or a partner?
Although the seizure of the American embassy in 1979, support for Islamic
terrorist organizations and the death sentence passed on writer
Salman Rushdie have all kept Iran internationally isolated, President
Khatami has steered Tehran toward rapprochement with the West. It
is generally acknowledged that Iran hasn't been involved in acts
of terrorism since Khatami's election, and he gave Britain the assurance
that it was not his government's policy to pursue the killing of
Rushdie. He has called for dialogue with the U.S., which he called
a "great people" in contrast with the preferred "Great Satan" characterization
used by some of his predecessors, and in May this year held an historic
meeting with Pope John Paul II.
Although
they're not comfortable with it, even Iran's conservatives recognize
the importance of normalizing ties with the West falling
oil prices over the past decade have diminished Iran's ability to
go it alone economically, and restoring trade relations with stronger
economies has become crucial to Iran's well-being.
Western
governments have welcomed Khatami's initiative, and a number of
European countries, including Britain, have recently restored ties
with Iran. The U.S. has adopted a more cautious position, indicating
a willingness to open a dialogue but at the same time avoiding giving
Khatami the kiss of death by allowing Iran's conservatives to charge
that his policies are blessed by the "Great Satan."
|