[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]




TIME Digital
TIME Digital Home
Digital Daily
Your Technology
TIME Tech
Web Features
Deal of the Day
Archives
The List
Bulletin Boards

Subscribe to
TIME Digital

About TIME Digital
Bookmark TIME Digital
Advertiser Info

TIME.com Home
CNN.com Tech News


marketplace
 
TIME Book Selections
 
TIME Annual: 1999-2000
TIME 100: Person of the Century
TIME Almanac 2000
TIME 75th Anniversary
TIME Great Images


Join TIME Digital's
Affiliate Program







Andrew McLaughlin

Andrew McLaughlin
Chief Policy Officer, ICANN

Previous | Dinosaurs

Let there be dots. let there be .bank, .sex and maybe even .sucks. For lo, earlier this year, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) announced it would begin accepting proposals for new "top-level domains" to go with the ones we all know, like .com, .org and .net. The new names could cater to particular industries (such as banks) or interests (such as sex) — and, hopefully, cut down on the endless squabbles, bitter lawsuits and mad bidding wars that keep erupting over website names. ICANN, a private, nonprofit company, will announce the new domains by the end of 2000. But it won't be easy. Andrew McLaughlin, ICANN's chief policy officer, is bracing for a blizzard of proposals from companies as to what these new domains should be. Hypothetical possibilities include .fin for financial companies, .sucks for protest sites or .museum for, well, you know. McLaughlin and the eight other members of ICANN's staff will make recommendations to their board of directors, who will ultimately choose.

One of McLaughlin's chief concerns is to avoid a new avalanche of litigation. It's easy to imagine that, just as Amazon.com had to battle another company over its domain name, it might have to fight again for, say, amazon.books. How to avoid this is still not clear — perhaps, McLaughlin speculates, it might help to impose a waiting period on new site names, giving contenders a chance to iron out their differences before a site name is issued. Another way to avoid problems: keep the number of new domains to a minimum. Consequently, most experts don't expect ICANN to approve more than half a dozen or so. "This is a test go-around," McLaughlin says. But if all goes well, 2001 may see a multitude of dots sprouting on the Web like so many blooms.

Previous | Dinosaurs

 

 

PHOTOGRAPH FOR TIME DIGITAL BY DAVID STRICK
PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION FOR TIME DIGITAL BY WILLIAM DUKE (inset)

W E B   F E A T U R E S   A R C H I V E



WRITE TO US | PRIVACY POLICY
Copyright © 2000 Time Inc.

TOP || HOME



MP3 header 2

Introduction
Movers and shakers for 2001

Steve Stanford
Icebox.com

Yoel Gat & Zur Feldman
Satellite broadband

Japanese Teenager
Wireless Internet

Gene Kan
File sharing

Dave Marvit & Vijay Saraswat
Internet messaging

Hironobu Sakaguchi
Final Fantasy

Jaap Haartsen
Bluetooth

Stephen King
Digital publishing

Jodie Bernstein
Online privacy

Avie Tevanian
Mac OS X

Tom Longstaff
Virus prevention

Andrew McLaughlin
Domain names

Digital Dinosaurs
Extinct by 2002?

Related Feature:

Digital 50
Fifty most important techies of 1999