| |
|
|
|
The Microsoft Antitrust Trial
|
|
 |  |
The bigger they are, the harder they fall, and they don't come much bigger
than Microsoft. Civil Action No. 98-1232, The United States v. Microsoft
Corporation, began with the filing of a complaint by the federal government
and 20 states on May 18, and we still have no idea where it's going to
end. The only thing that's certain is that the outcome will affect every
person and every company on the planet that works with computers.
Media-wise, the trial has it all -- an unphotogenic villain (that would be
Bill Gates), a plucky underdog (Netscape), blurry videotape and money,
money, money -- but the nitty-gritty details of the proceedings have often
proved difficult to follow, hanging as they do on arcane points of
antitrust law, which in turn hang on evidence that consists of
half-forgotten meetings, technical jargon and repudiated e-mails. There
have been some dramatic twists and turns along the way, notably AOL's
surprise purchase of Netscape and its alliance with Sun Microsystems, three
companies represented by key witnesses for the government. And how could we
forget that internal e-mail from Netscape describing its browser as "faster
than a dog with no legs, if the dog's up to his waist in treacle. And
dead." But even if the trial goes nowhere -- as a similar action against
IBM did in the '80s -- no one will ever look at Gates and his gang quite the
same way again.
Related Coverage:
TIME.com's Target: Microsoft
The DOJ's Microsoft Trial Page
Video of Gates's Testimony
| |
|