
Keeping the Convention on Message
How the Democrats plan to keep the focus away from Bush and on Kerry
By
DOUGLAS WALLER/BOSTON

Monday, Jul. 26, 2004
Democrats boast that they’re the most unified they’ve ever been going into
this week’s convention in Boston. Whether that’s completely true remains to be
seen; this is a party that loves a good internal fight. Nevertheless, top aides to
Sen. John Kerry, who will accept his party’s nomination Thursday, hope that
unity will translate into the single goal they have for this convention:
introducing their candidate to Americans. “We’re going to use the next couple of days
to talk about John Kerry and have other people talk about John Kerry,” says
Kerry campaign manager Mary Beth Cahill, who spoke with reporters in Boston
Monday morning. “We’re going to see people talking about his values.”
Much of the job of introducing Kerry to Americans will fall to Kerry
himself when he delivers his acceptance speech, but the
campaign has been struggling mightily to get other convention
speakers particularly the prime timers to focus on telling Kerry’s story instead of eating
up valuable television time tearing down Bush. Kerry is obsessed with
projecting a positive image and not having the convention week fall into a Republican-bashing extravaganza.
The speeches will be heavy with themes: building an America
strong at home and respected in the world, with a stronger economy,
affordable health care, energy independence and a robust national defense.
Keeping all the top speakers on that positive message is “a challenge,”
Cahill admits. Kerry advisers have had a series of conference calls the last
couple weeks with the speechwriters for top Democrats such as Al Gore, Bill
Richardson, and Hillary and Bill Clinton, to emphasize the themes the candidate wants
echoed. All seem to be on the same page, although Gore won’t be
able to resist a little Bush-bashing because of his 2000 defeat. Fortunately,
Gore appears Monday night, so Kerry aides hope any bitter taste the public might
feel from a more strident speech will have faded by Thursday.
The Kerry campaign has read drafts of many of
the speeches and appears satisfied. The only worry now is speakers jabbering on and cutting into the
prime time stars from 10 to 11 p.m. each night. “Often when we get a copy of the
speech, what is supposed to be a six-minute speech actually is fifteen,” says
Cahill. Otherwise, “people understand our message and they want to talk about
it,” claims Tad Devine, the campaign’s media and strategy adviser who joined
Cahill in the press briefing. The testimonials are critical for the Kerry
campaign. Fewer than a third of the public say they know as much about Kerry as
they do of Bush. A third of the public doesn’t know he’s a Vietnam veteran and
few realize he once was a state prosecutor. Kerry aides are eager to have
someone other than Bush and the media tell their candidate’s life story. “The
convention is really our first opportunity to present John Kerry in an
unfiltered fashion,” says Cahill, who adds that polls show up to two-thirds of the
public will “be paying attention to the convention.”
The Kerry campaign realizes that after the convention they enter their
dangerous period, when the Bush campaign will have an extra month to unload tens of
millions of primary dollars in campaign ads while Kerry will have to remain
far more silent to husband the $75 million in federal campaign funds he can then
only spend until the election. “It’s going to open the door [for the
Republicans],” Devine says. Fortunately for the Kerry
campaign, the undecided voters are unlikely to make up their minds in August. Kerry
and Edwards also will travel across the country aggressively campaigning, much
of it together, to stanch the bleeding in the polls. But “we’re essentially
going dark in the month of August” as far as airing more expensive TV ads, says
Cahill.
To weather Bush’s August offensive, Kerry this week must carve a more
concrete image of himself in voters’ minds. Cahill will be happy if he can walk away
from Boston with “people [seeing] him as a leader, as someone who is ready to
lead this nation…If we wind up with that, we will have really achieved
something.”
BACK TO TOP
|