Coolness Under Fire
Kerry insists he will prevail, but will a sharper message be enough?
Here's how the race is changing
By
MICHAEL DUFFY AND KAREN TUMULTY
Sunday, Sep. 12, 2004
Sometimes a politician has to put his head down and just say it ain't
so. That's how it went with Senator John Kerry last week. While the
rest of the political world obsessed about the dive his campaign has
taken in the past month, the growing doubts inside his party about
his performance on the stump and a campaign clock that seems to be
ticking faster now that Labor Day has come and gone, the Democratic
nominee tried to present a picture of unworried resolve when he sat
down in his campaign plane for a half-hour interview with TIME last
Friday afternoon.
The table in front of him clear except for
a half-eaten piece of blackberry pie, the well-worn home plate from
Iowa's Field of Dreams baseball diamond in the aisle next to his
seat, Kerry talked about the race, his opponent, his record and his
plansbut not about his doubts, if he has any. "I think we are doing
extraordinarily well," he told TIME. "I think this is a close race,
and it's going to be a close race. I feel very confident in where we
are and confident about the direction of this race."
But with only seven weeks until the election, the vector of Kerry's
campaign is, if anything, entirely uphill. A new TIME survey of 857
likely voters reveals that President Bush has retained the solid
11-point lead he earned during the New York City convention earlier
this month. Kerry's support has eroded across almost every
demographic group but most notably among women. In a departure from
recent patterns, among registered voters, women now favor Bush over
Kerry by 45% to 44%, and men are breaking for the President by a
lopsided 56% to 34%.
And for Kerry, that's not the worst of it. The landscape of the race
has changed, and the new ground tends to favor Republicans. Terrorism
has replaced the economy as the most important issue in the race, and
on those topics and nearly every other issue, voters give higher
marks to Bush than to Kerrysometimes by dramatic 20-point margins.
Bush's job-approval rating has returned to a safe cruising altitude
of 56%, close to where Bill Clinton stood at this point in 1996,
while Kerry's unfavorable ratings have mushroomed from 29% a month
ago to 42% today. That's dangerous territory for any politician, but
if Kerry is worried about those numbers, he tried hard not to show
it. Asked about Bush's recent surge, Kerry said, "I don't know what
you are talking about in terms of the Bush bounce."
Instead, Kerry insisted, the race is just getting under way, and
voters are "beginning to listen, and listen carefully" to the debate.
"When we get into those cold days of October and people's juices
begin to flow and they measure us one to one, who's going to be
stronger for America, I'm confident that my record of fighting for
this country since I was a young man is going to eclipse the choices
that have been disastrous that have been made by George Bush," Kerry
said.
In fact, many voters have been listening closely for months, and that
partly explains why Kerry has slipped in the polls. Democrats and
Republicans agree that the Kerry campaign focused its convention so
tightly on the theme of the candidate's military servicechiefly to
blunt the public's doubts about his qualifications to be Commander in
Chiefthat it came out of Boston without a clearly defined domestic
agenda for the nation. Kerry hardly lacks a platform at home; his
health-care and fiscal policies are far more detailed, if less
numerous, than Bush's. But the campaign didn't pivot from the past to
the future after Boston and then hammer home Kerry's ideas. That left
Bush a huge openingand he reached for it in New York City. "They
made a big bet on his Vietnam service," said Mark Penn, Bill
Clinton's longtime pollster. "It was a good backdrop, but it was just
that. He didn't really have an agenda coupled with that service."
More damaging was Kerry's nonresponse to the Swift Boat Veterans for
Truth, who over the summer accused Kerry of misrepresenting his
military record in a series of television ads. The Swifties' initial
charges were reckless and unfair, but the Kerry camp's political
instincts were almost worse. The campaign did ... nothing.
Incredibly, it felt the need to conduct focus groups to decide
whether to respond to the veterans and, more incredibly, concluded
that the public would be turned off if it did. So Kerry tried to
ignore the whole thing, making two costly errors at once: he allowed
a political attack to go unanswered, and he signaled to Americans
that he wouldn't lift a finger to defend himself. In an election year
that at bottom is about who can best defend the homeland, Kerry's
refusal to strike back hard and fast when his own hide was on the
line was a startling misreading of what voters are looking for in a
leader after 9/11. Realizing the gravity of their error, Kerry's
aides eventually leaked word that the candidate was unhappy with his
campaign's handling of the Swifties. In public, though, Kerry sees no
misstep. "I think we did absolutely fine," he told TIME.
Page 1 of 3 1 | 2 | 3 Next > >
BACK TO TOP
|