LEAD STORY
Voices of a New Generation: Eight young leaders head to Davos with huge hopes for Europe and big ideas about how to make a difference

Across the Great Divide
The Davos' élite must listen, say Thierry Malleret and Klaus Schwab

War And Peace
Thinking a fast win in Iraq will fix what's wrong with the global economy? TIME's panel of economists sees plenty of gloom ahead

Doubts At Davos
Misgivings about America are the talk of the town

Killer Worm
Can anyone stop the Slammer Worm ... and its imitators?

Subscribe to TIME

Forecast 2003 Forecast 2003: TIME predicts global political, economic and social trends
WEF 2002 With 9/11 fresh in the mind the World Economic Forum moves to New York

Davos 2001
Much of the talk was devoted to closing the techno gap

Davos 2000
TIME's Don Morrison tells of sensitivity training for the rich

Have the Davos meetings done anything to make the world a better place?

Yes
No
Don't Know

NOTE: This is an unscientific, informal survey for the interest and enjoyment of TIME.com users and may not be indicative of popular opinion.


The World Economic Forum Official Site

India Economic Summit

The 'Other' Davos

WEF news search Engine



E-mail your letter to the editor




ALESSANDRO DELLA VALLE/AP
HELPING HANDS: Bridging Europe hopes to draw people into the European debate

Across the Great Divide
Why Davos' élite must listen to the young leaders of the Bridging Europe Initiative By


Today, the European Union is faced with Euro-skepticism and the widespread belief that it suffers from what E.U. jargon refers to as a "democratic deficit." This stems from the perception that the debate on the future of Europe is too technical, driven by a handful of politicians and senior officials in Brussels who make far-reaching decisions without necessarily taking into consideration the wishes of the general population. Perceptions do matter, because in the end they help shape reality: if European citizens feel they are not involved in the way Europe is changing, they will become even more disengaged than they are today. The idea behind the whole European project will become endangered, and in a worst-case scenario the European Union might even collapse. This extreme outcome was explored in 1999 by the European Commission itself, with one scenario envisaging Europe-wide rioting and the headquarters of the Commission set on fire after plans to reform European welfare systems failed.

So it is crucial to engage people — to make Europe the Europe of its citizens by giving them an opportunity to say what they would like their future to be. In order to do so, it is necessary to reach well beyond the élite to find out what ordinary people really want. A conceptual framework to do just that was originated by the political scientist Jürgen Habermas at the turn of the 1980s. Habermas came up with the notion of "participative democracy": a model of democratic legitimacy grounded on discursive situations in which participants have to persuade each other by the force of argument alone.

Relying on this methodology, the prescription to cure Euro-skepticism is straightforward: improve communication through bottom-up, active dialogue rather than top-down dissemination of information, and give people control of their own agenda and the opportunity to use new democratic tools such as deliberative polling and electronic democracy. The idea of deliberative polling is modeled on the ancient Athenian Council, in which a large representative sample of citizens assembled in an effort to model what the electorate as a whole would think if it could be immersed in intensive deliberative processes.

Typically, a sample of citizens is brought together for several days to discuss an issue. They complete a survey, read materials and have an opportunity to pose questions to experts and politicians with different opinions. After participating in several sessions, they are polled again to determine how much their opinions have changed. People always demonstrate they have developed a more complex understanding of the issue than they previously held. Electronic democracy depends on information technologies: properly used, they can reinvigorate democracies by providing cheap and instant access to a network of knowledge and communication by providing links among governments, institutions and citizens.

It was with these objectives in mind that Bridging Europe was created as a joint project between the World Economic Forum and the Danish think tank Monday Morning to help promote democratic sustainability in Europe. This project rests on two very simple and yet powerful ideas. The first is that dialogue is the driving force of progress to reduce skepticism and promote understanding. A simple, decent dialogue can go a long way toward reconciling seemingly irreconcilable differences. Unlike a debate, a dialogue is a collaborative exercise: one looks for strengths in opposite positions, helping to build an open-minded attitude and a willingness to change position. To use the analogy of game theory, a debate is a zero-sum game (the gain of one side is the loss of the other) while a dialogue is a positive-sum game — it allows both sides to reach a better solution than either of their original ones.



Get the Magazine — Try 4 Issues Free!


I R A Q   C R I S I S
The Rumsfeld Plan: Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is micromanaging the details of a U.S. attack against Iraq.

E U R O P E
Algerian Alarm: A string of arrests suggests British police are breaking up an Algerian terror network
P R O F I L E
Gilberto Gil: The former musician and superstar wants to help Brazil's new President, Lula, make good on his promises to the poor

B U S I N E S S
The Joy of Text
Coming to a cell phone near you: big-time marketing campaigns


Promotion
ADVERTISEMENT


FROM THE JAN 27, 2003, ISSUE OF TIME MAGAZINE; POSTED SUNDAY, JAN. 19, 2003

 © 2003 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
FAQ | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use