Blair in the Glare
After the British Prime Minister testified last week — beating back charges that his team "sexed up" the case for war against Iraq — his top spin doctor resigned. Can Blair repair his tarnished image?
Spun Out
Alastair Campbell, Blair's alter ego, says goodbye to all that
No Sweat For Bush
Liberia and Niger are not on the itinerary, but they are on the agenda
Timeline
Step by Step guide through the war of words

Conflicted
Tony Blair swims against a high tide of antiwar opinion
[03/10/3]
Blair's Britain
Is Blair's vision of a "modern Britain" is taking longer to become a reality [6/05/2002]

Is the end of spin?

Yes
No
What do you really mean?



E-mail your letter to the editor







Bush called his ties with Mbeki "strong," while Mbeki lauded Bush's "clear commitment" to Africa
MATTHEW FEARN/PA
HOLDING COURT: The formidable Lord Hutton leads the enquiry


Winning The Battle, Losing The War
Tony Blair testifies at the Hutton Inquiry and prevails over the BBC. But voters still think he misled them about Saddam's threat, and his top spin doctor resigns. Here's what Blair has to do to start winning back the public's trust
print article email TIMEeurope Subscribe

Posted Sunday, August 31, 2003; 13.05BST
When Tony Blair's motorcade swept into the Royal Courts of Justice last Thursday morning, he knew he faced a more searing spotlight than any he'd stared down before. The Hutton Inquiry into the apparent suicide of biochemical-weapons expert David Kelly — and the government's alleged dissembling on the road to war — had already transfixed Britain for more than two weeks, and the Prime Minister's testimony was bound to be its climax. Clusters of antiwar protesters were ready with jeers, Pinocchio-style noses and placards reading WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: B.LIAR. Blair emerged into that maelstrom from a black Range Rover wearing a dark blue suit, a businesslike burgundy tie and a tight smile. Just before he slipped inside the building, he gave the slightest glance to the phalanx of photographers and cameramen, as if to say to them and the rest of the world: I know you're watching. And I'm ready.

He was. In 21/2 hours of apparently frank testimony — always thoughtful and reasoned, passionate when passion was called for — Blair gave a masterful performance. In that lawyerly environment of "My Lords" and obsequious nods, Blair was a winner — we can now believe that Downing Street did not knowingly mislead the public by inserting into a dossier the shaky claim that Saddam Hussein could launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes. But though he won that battle, the larger war for public trust is not going so well. According to an ICM/Sunday Telegraph poll released prior to his testimony, 67% of Britons believe Blair's government misled them about Iraq's WMD. In a YouGov/Daily Telegraph poll, only 22% describe the government as "honest and trustworthy," down from 56% in 2001. And in what has become a monumental showdown between the government and the media, a TIME/CNN poll found that only 6% of Britons consider the government a more trustworthy source for facts about war than the BBC. On Friday, when Alastair Campbell, Blair's communications director and most trusted adviser, announced his long-rumored resignation, he left Blair in charge of a government whose relationship with the public was fundamentally and perhaps irrevocably broken.

The p.r. war is far from over. Lord Hutton will not issue his findings until October, but his inquiry has already laid bare the media-obsessed ways of Blair's government, opened a window into the secret world of the intelligence services, and raised vexing issues about leadership, transparency and trust. Now Blair faces the huge challenge of winning back his credibility without resorting anew to the spin tactics so identified with Campbell. To understand what Blair must do to reclaim his premiership, it's helpful to see how it all went wrong on the road to Iraq.

Last September, when the Prime Minister presented the intelligence dossier that included the claim that Iraq could unleash WMD within 45 minutes, the response was muted. Analysts shrugged, saying it contained little new information. As the war wound down and coalition forces searched in vain for WMD, Blair's repeated claims — he called the threat "serious and current" — became political tinder. That ignited when BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan alleged in late May that the government had released the dossier knowing that, according to "one of the senior officials in charge of drawing up that dossier," the 45-minute claim could be untrue. That source was believed to be Kelly, who was found dead on July 18.

1 | 2 | 3 | Next







Table of Contents
Subscribe to TIME

ADVERTISEMENT

On New Year's Eve, the Miseries of Minsk
As Russia hikes up the cost of gas for Belarus, the mood turns gloomy
Mogadishu at 60 Miles an Hour
Arms merchants are once again doing brisk business after a rapid change of power in this tough town, but so far the peace has held
The Year of The Nuke
A rundown of the world's nuclear powerhouses, and what to expect in the coming months
QUICK LINKS: Blair in the Glare | Spun Out | No Sweat For Bush | Timeline | Back to TIMEeurope.com Home
FROM THE SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 ISSUE OF TIME MAGAZINE; POSTED SUNDAY, AUGUST 31, 2003

BANNER PHOTO BY KIERAN DOHERTY/REUTERS

 © 2003 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Subscribe | Customer Service | FAQ | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us
World Watch e-mail | Try AOL UK for 120 hours FREE | Try FOUR free issues of TIME