timeeurope.com

TIME Europe Home
  Europe
  Middle East
  Africa
  World
  Digital Europe
  Business
  Travel & Arts
  Photo Essays
  TIME Trails
  Magazine
  Archive
  Fast Forward

Special Features
  Fast Forward
  Forecast 2001
  E-Europe
Search TIME Europe
 
Subscribe to TIME
Subscriber Services
About Us

TIME Daily
TIME Asia
TIME Canada
TIME Pacific
TIME Digital
Latest CNN News

FREE NEWSLETTER!
Sign up now for TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter.
[ preview ]

 


Other News
spacer gif
spacer gif
Check the New 2000
FORTUNE 500 Today!

FORTUNE.com

spacer gif
Sivy On Stocks,
By E-Mail

MONEY.com

spacer gif
The 'X-Men' Cometh
And EW's Got 'Em!

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY

spacer gif



TIME EUROPE
APRIL 24, 2000 VOL. 155 NO. 16


History Wins, Irving Loses
Controversial historian David Irving loses his libel suit and is branded a pro-Nazi falsifier of history
By HELEN GIBSON London

David irving's reputation as a historian of the Third Reich has been in tatters for years, with publishers refusing to print his books and some countries, including Germany and Canada, refusing him entry. But if he retained any professional credibility it was extinguished last week in a British High Court when a judge branded him an anti-Semitic, racist Holocaust denier who associated regularly with neo-Nazis and deliberately distorted history to serve his own political views.

For Irving, 62, the libel case ruling, which he called "perverse" and will seek to appeal, also threatens financial ruin. Although he pleaded his own case, the two-month trial ran up legal defense costs of more than $3 million, most of which Irving will now have to cover. Probably far worse for this self-taught historian and author of some 16 books is what Richard Evans, professor of modern history at Cambridge University, predicts will now happen: "If there were any publishers left who still took him seriously, they won't any longer."

Irving has only himself to blame for his predicament. It was he who brought the libel case against American professor Deborah Lipstadt, whose book Denying the Holocaust: the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory accused Irving of being "one of the most dangerous spokespersons for Holocaust denial," and her publisher Penguin Books. Irving, who relies on income from self-publishing and from right-wing supporters, maintained he had to sue to protect his livelihood. He says he has never denied that the Holocaust occurred, but he questions the number of Jewish dead and that there was a systematic plan of extermination in the camps. He has stuck by other highly controversial claims, including those that Hitler was unaware of the mass murder of Europe's Jews until late 1943, that the gas chambers at Auschwitz were a myth and that most prisoners died there of disease, starvation or hard labor.

The defendants, who employed a battery of historians, put forward 19 instances in which Irving had distorted the evidence. The judge found that the criticisms were "almost invariably well-founded," that Irving appeared to "take every opportunity to exculpate Hitler" and that "no objective, fair-minded historian would have serious cause to doubt that there were gas chambers at Auschwitz."

Yet the judge also credited Irving with an "unparalleled" knowledge of World War II and for painstaking research that had unearthed many undiscovered documents, an evaluation with which most historians agree. So how did this son of a British naval officer get it so wrong? A long-time admirer of Germany, Irving always enjoyed his role as a provocative historian. But after claiming in Hitler's War, published in 1977, that the Führer was ignorant of the mass extermination of Jews until 1943, he was courted by neo-Nazi groups and his theories and associates became more and more extremist.

Historian Donald Cameron Watt worries that this case could have one undesirable outcome -- to drive the Holocaust deniers underground. "We need to have this stuff out in the open, to thrash out the reality before the witnesses are all dead," he says. Maybe, but for most, Irving as a provoker of debate has been one provocation too far.

This edition's table of contents
TIME Europe home


More stories from TIME Europe and related links

E-mail us at mail@timeatlantic.com

COPYRIGHT © 2000 TIME INC.



More Stories

April 24, 2000

COVER STORY

The Incredible Bulk
Testosterone, which can increase libido and help build muscles, will be available soon in easy-to-use gel form. But it can cause liver damage and prostate cancer. Why are people willing to risk their health for it?

Never Too Buff
A new book reveals a troubling obsession: how male self-worth is increasingly tied to body image

Viewpoint
Joel Stein worries about his testosterone

EUROPE

Blowing the Whistle on the Past
A former Czech political dissident hunts down communist-era secret police collaborators

Neither Here Nor There
Serbs who deserted the war in Kosovo are finding no welcome in the West

History Wins, Irving Loses
Controversial historian David Irving loses his libel suit and is branded a pro-Nazi falsifier of history

Viewpoint
Rich Westerners make poor advocates for their friends in the Third World

Viewpoint
Law enforcers must learn to move faster to snare global lawbreakers

MIDDLE EAST

Withdrawal Symptoms
Syria vacillates as Israel seeks world support for a plan to pull its troops out of southern Lebanon

Jews on Trial
An Iranian spy case undermines an ancient minority and a modern President

THE ARTS

The Rem Movement
Architecture is changing. The proof? Its biggest prize, the Pritzker, goes to a thinker rather than a pure designer

Performed with True Passion
The English National Opera brings Bach to vivid dramatic life

The End of Innocence
Ishiguro's new novel, When We Were Orphans, probes the wounds of vanished childhood

DEPARTMENTS

Techwatch

World Watch