timeeurope.com

TIME Europe Home
  Europe
  Middle East
  Africa
  World
  Digital Europe
  Business
  Travel & Arts
  Photo Essays
  TIME Trails
  Magazine
  Archive
  Fast Forward

Special Features
  Fast Forward
  Forecast 2001
  E-Europe
Search TIME Europe
 
Subscribe to TIME
Subscriber Services
About Us

TIME Daily
TIME Asia
TIME Canada
TIME Pacific
TIME Digital
Latest CNN News

FREE NEWSLETTER!
Sign up now for TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter.
[ preview ]

 


Other News
spacer gif
spacer gif
Check the New 2000
FORTUNE 500 Today!

FORTUNE.com

spacer gif
Sivy On Stocks,
By E-Mail

MONEY.com

spacer gif
The 'X-Men' Cometh
And EW's Got 'Em!

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY

spacer gif



TIME EUROPE
July 17, 2000 VOL. 156 NO. 3


Europe's Not Up in Arms
A Euro Army is the declared goal, but there's more smoke than firepower
By DANIEL BENJAMIN

When the talk turns to defense, Europe and America can seem less like the proud partners of a half-century than an aged, quarrelsome couple. No subject gets the neuralgia going quite so well: Europeans grouse about America's determination to squash all Euro-innovation. Americans mutter darkly about Continental intrigues to drive the U.S. from Europe and consign history's most successful alliance to the ash heap.

This ritual is set to begin anew — in a slightly different key. With the start of its European Union presidency this month, France has signaled that it will push hard to create a European military force that can act independently of nato. Such a force has long been a grail for European leaders, something essential if E.U. citizens are to see "Europe" as more than just an instrument for increasing prosperity.

This time, however, Europe's leaders are galvanized as never before, shamed into action by the experience of Kosovo. Europe boasts almost 2 million men under arms, but struggled to deploy fewer than 50,000 to the Balkans. Europeans flew 20% of the sorties; the bombs and missiles that drove off the Serbs were made in the U.S. and launched mostly by Americans. Dismay at this showing may have passed, but after decades of opposition, Britain has joined the project, changing the calculus entirely.

The result was the "Headline Goal" of December's E.U. summit in Helsinki — a force of 60,000 troops that could be dispatched in 60 days and sustained in the field for a year. The deadline on the Headline is 2003. Since Helsinki, committees have formed, but the text under the Headline still needs writing. The hands on the keyboard belong to France, the greatest champion of European defense and one of the few partners with the clout to push others forward.

Should America embrace the Euro-army? Yes. The familiar carping about Europe "decoupling" from the U.S. continues in the corridors at defense planning sessions, but the Clinton administration has recognized that the real peril to the Euro-American alliance is not Europe's potential strength but its weakness. Washington's encouraging voice is rising over the choir of doubters. There are questions: How will this new defense entity connect with nato? What role will non-E.U. nato allies play? What missions will Europe undertake? The 15 committed themselves to "peacemaking," but an armored column could be driven through the vagueness of that term.

But the paramount challenge Europe faces is itself, because while the rhetoric may be strong, budgets are weak. European politicians swear that with combined annual military spending of $166 billion, conversion of these armies from cold war territorial defense into a machine for projecting force far away can be done from existing resources. No one — including Europe's generals — believes that.

Reorganizing Europe's armies for new tasks will cost money. Equipping them for peacemaking — or more modest tasks — will cost much more. Europe needs "lift" (transport planes), firepower (precision guided munitions) and the tangle of communications and intelligence hardware essential for any serious mission. Even low estimates run into the tens of billions of euros over many years.

Postwar European governments have never been good at mustering political will for such spending. After two world wars, Europe's citizens remain queasy about military might, and few leaders speak frankly to them about the need to build armies in peacetime. Since 1989, the U.S. harvested its peace dividend and, in the face of Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo and Iraq again, is pumping spending back up. The trend of European outlays continues downward. The U.S. spends 3.4% of gdp on defense, Europe 1.8%.

Herein lies a threat to the transatlantic alliance greater than any disagreement over missile defense. If the Headline remains only paper, the next time military muscle is needed, the link with the U.S. will be stressed to breaking point. In the cold war, America bemoaned Europe's shortfalls but winked at the imbalance for solidarity's sake. Now, though, the old Europhile caucus is in retirement.

Now, U.S. senators write "conditionality" into legislation — meaning, to cite a recent case, that the U.S. will cut funding for Kosovo peacekeeping if Europe doesn't spend every promised euro on the project. The White House beat that back, but the road to the future will be lined with such conditions. When France holds a conference at the end of the year to solicit commitments to the Euro-army, Washington fears this will mean designating existing units for tasks they can already perform — declaring victory and going home.

When French President Jacques Chirac unfurled his government's priorities for its E.U. presidency in Berlin recently, Eurodefense stood at the top of the list. But that was two sentences, skated past quickly. Europe's leaders need to start talking to Europe's citizens about Europe's defense.

This edition's table of contents
TIME Europe home


More stories from TIME Europe and related links

E-mail us at mail@timeatlantic.com

COPYRIGHT © 2000 TIME INC.



More Stories

July 17, 2000

COVER
The Lure of Ecstasy
The elixir best known for powering raves is an 80-year-old illegal drug. But it's showing up outside clubs too, and advocates claim it even has therapeutic benefits. Just how dangerous is it?

Rave New World
It's more than just ecstasy. The youth culture is in thrall to deejays and floats on the relentless beat of electronic music

EUROPE
Putin's Hard 100
The honeymoon's over for Russia's new leader as he battles on military, political and economic fronts

Putin's Chechnya Nightmare
The War the Kremlin Said Was Won

The Haider Effect
Isolated and angry over diplomatic sanctions, Austria threatens to raise the stakes on E.U. enlargement

That's Another Fine Mess
An underage drinking spree sees Euan Blair arrested, and his dad nursing a political hangover

Sun, Sand and Toxic Waste
For the first time ever the European Court of Justice fines an E.U. member state

Europe's Not Up in Arms
A Euro Army is the declared goal, but there's more smoke than firepower

MIDDLE  EAST
Why Arafat's in a State
He wants a Palestinian nation, but fears that his people won't forgive him if he makes concessions

The Modern Mullah
One of the architects of Khomeini's revolution has become a guru of Islamic reform in Iran

AFRICA
Fatal Destiny
Experts are meeting in South Africa to combat a plague ravaging the continent — but already there are disputes over the right strategy

Death Row
Kenyans would rather not talk about the disease that is destroying lives and threatening the economy

The Cost Of Living
Pharmaceutical Companies and Drugs

A Distant Mirror
Europe's Black Death is a history lesson in human tragedy — and economic renewal

BUSINESS
Keep the Change
Turkey's government takes on the structural problems at the heart of the country's economy

The Infoanarchist
Could this 23-year-old Irish programmer begin to unravel the Web?

The Data Haven
Closely Guarded Secrets

RELIGION
The Stained Glass Ceiling
Despite stubbornly held conservative attitudes, women are claiming their place in the pulpit

DEPARTMENTS
To Our Readers

Tech Watch

World Watch