timeeurope.com

TIME Europe Home
  Europe
  Middle East
  Africa
  World
  Digital Europe
  Business
  Travel & Arts
  Photo Essays
  TIME Trails
  Magazine
  Archive
  Fast Forward

Special Features
  Fast Forward
  Forecast 2001
  E-Europe
Search TIME Europe
 
Subscribe to TIME
Subscriber Services
About Us

TIME Daily
TIME Asia
TIME Canada
TIME Pacific
TIME Digital
Latest CNN News

FREE NEWSLETTER!
Sign up now for TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter.
[ preview ]

 


Other News
spacer gif
spacer gif
Check the New 2000
FORTUNE 500 Today!

FORTUNE.com

spacer gif
Sivy On Stocks,
By E-Mail

MONEY.com

spacer gif
The 'X-Men' Cometh
And EW's Got 'Em!

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY

spacer gif



TIME EUROPE
July 31, 2000, Vol. 156 No. 5


To Each His Own?
The answer's not clear when it comes to personal data. Ideas differ about how much control we need
By AISHA LABI

The Internet may be creating new vectors of communication on a global scale, but regulating it is a far more parochial affair, particularly when it comes to privacy. This week Britain's House of Commons will consider a controversial government proposal to allow official access to virtually all electronic communications for law-enforcement purposes — a measure that would give U.K. officials far more power than their counterparts in Washington dare ask for. And for years, a debate has raged between the European Union and the United States on how best to safeguard personal privacy from commercial abuse.

As the population of online consumers accustomed to providing personal data to e-tailers and Web-based services has grown, so too have concerns about the potential uses — and abuses — of this valuable raw data. Privacy groups in the U.S. and Europe have lobbied for legislation that would limit the ability of companies to share, use or sell the consumer information they collect. Until now Americans, with their characteristic faith in the power of self-regulation, have shied away from enacting sweeping new legislation. In sharp contrast, Europeans have adopted a more interventionist approach. In 1995, well before the e-commerce revolution was fully under way, the European Commission drafted the Data Protection Directive, a measure designed to "protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, and in particular their right to privacy with respect to the processing of personal data." The directive took effect in October 1998, but only recently did the E.U. and the U.S. reach a hard-won compromise on how it applies to U.S. companies. Under the agreement, the U.S. Commerce Department will establish a list of companies that meet stringent European guidelines for the collection and use of personal data. These companies will then be granted "safe harbor" status, securing them against data blockages.

The safe harbor pact combines elements of the American self-regulatory approach with Europe's preference for explicit safeguards. It means that American companies doing business — online or otherwise — in Europe will be subjected to far more rigorous controls on what information they can collect from customers than they face in the U.S. Under the safe harbor rules, American companies would be prevented from compiling detailed user profiles of European-based customers for commercial use. Personal data could be collected only if "the data subject has unambiguously given his consent." Complying with even this basic requirement could mean a significant adjustment in how many American e-commerce companies operate. Additional safe harbor restrictions would allow companies to collect only the data they need to secure a contract.

An essential component of the safe harbor accord is the use of private sector controls to ensure American conformity. Under this system, companies are allowed to cede responsibility for their privacy standards to a separate organization which monitors its members' compliance with privacy guidelines; such organizations will form what Ulf Breuhann of the European Commission calls "the first layer of compliance bodies." One is TRUSTe, whose network of participating companies includes AOL, Ernst & Young, Microsoft and Novell.

But despite the Commission's apparent faith in such a system, the European Parliament signaled its doubts earlier this month by endorsing a report criticizing the agreement's safeguards as inadequate. Though that vote has no legal force and the Commission has indicated it will proceed, it is one more indication of the strong reservations that persist among many European privacy advocates. "Even among those companies that have tried to underwrite their privacy policy by joining an organization such as TRUSTe, there have been no examples of companies being sanctioned effectively by these parent organizations," says Caspar Bowden, director of the London-based Foundation for Information Policy Research. "There is zero confidence in Europe that these sorts of badges could be an effective alternative to enforceable data protection."

But the rapid technological changes that have given rise to these widespread concerns could ultimately spawn solutions as well. Last month, the World Wide Web Consortium, a U.S-based industry group that promotes Web privacy standards, test-ran its new Platform for Privacy Preferences, a program that would allow users to configure their own privacy requirements.

If programs like this prove successful, the question of whether it is up to the government or the private sector to determine the right level of Internet privacy will be moot. Individuals will be able to take the matter into their own hands and decide just how much of their private lives they are willing to share with others.

This edition's table of contents
TIME Europe home


More stories from TIME Europe and related links

E-mail us at mail@timeatlantic.com

COPYRIGHT © 2000 TIME INC.



More Stories

July 31, 2000

SPECIAL REPORT
Spies Among Us
More than 20 million people have downloaded programs that secretly snoop inside their PCs. Are you one of them?

To Each His Own?
The answer's not clear when it comes to personal data. Ideas differ about how much control we need

EUROPE
The Final Reckoning
Businesses agree to compensation for wartime Germany's forced labor policies — but where's the money?

Sharing the Burden
German author Carola Stern talks about her call to share the compensation burden

A Nasty Tax Hangover
Sweden has one of Europe's lowest levels of booze-related illness — but now it faces an Absolut dilemma

Terror Reigns
Spain is rocked by a new wave of separatist attacks

Compensation Conflict
High politics and hidden treasure

MIDDLE EAST
Inside the Talks
How do you get Yasser Arafat and Ehud Barak to sit together? Time looks at the long, hard road just to reach the Camp David summit

BUSINESS
Don't Call Us
Telefónica's controversial chairman gets the cold shoulder from many of his former friends

TECHNOLOGY
Stamping Out Mines
Two machines designed in the U.K. offer hope for safe and speedy removal of war's deadly leftovers

SOCIETY
What Money Can't Buy
In a scathing book, super-shopper Mouna Ayoub claims her life married to a rich Saudi was hell

THE ARTS
Valentino's Day
As the Italian designer rethinks his business plan for the new millennium, his loyal "Val's Gals" celebrate 40 years of gowns with a timeless appeal

Unleashing a Storm
Digital effects play the major role in this would-be blockbuster — and make a splash in others too

Wickedly Good Fun
Bubble, bubble, months of trouble: Cameron Mackintosh's new show, The Witches of Eastwick, casts its spell in London

DEPARTMENTS
Techwatch

World Watch