timeeurope.com

TIME Europe Home
  Europe
  Middle East
  Africa
  World
  Digital Europe
  Business
  Travel & Arts
  Photo Essays
  TIME Trails
  Magazine
  Archive
  Fast Forward

Special Features
  Fast Forward
  Forecast 2001
  E-Europe
Search TIME Europe
 
Subscribe to TIME
Subscriber Services
About Us

TIME Daily
TIME Asia
TIME Canada
TIME Pacific
TIME Digital
Latest CNN News

FREE NEWSLETTER!
Sign up now for TIME's WorldWatch email newsletter.
[ preview ]

 


Other News
spacer gif
spacer gif
Check the New 2000
FORTUNE 500 Today!

FORTUNE.com

spacer gif
Sivy On Stocks,
By E-Mail

MONEY.com

spacer gif
The 'X-Men' Cometh
And EW's Got 'Em!

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY

spacer gif



TIME EUROPE
October 9, 2000, Vol. 156 No. 15


Viewpoint

Denmark's Message
Hamlet's heirs want to know where Europe is going
By JOSEF JOFFE

Now that the Danes have dropped out of euroland again, disappointed Europeanists will look for solace in that hackneyed quote from Hamlet: "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark." But read on — to the less familiar line: "There's a special providence in the fall of a sparrow." What is this Danish bird trying to tell the rest of Europe? On the surface, the naysayers have signaled that the risks of hanging back are manageable. De facto, the Danes are part of the Economic and Monetary Union anyway. Having chained themselves to the (once) almighty deutsche mark 20 years ago, the Danes are now wedded to the euro, too. Informal membership has exacted a slight penalty: interest rates in Jutland are one percentage point higher than in Euroland. A flight from the kroner? That, too, has been discounted by Danes great and small.

So what has truly riled them? They saw a far greater threat to their "Danitude" than to their currency. This Danish sparrow has been able to enjoy a wonderful life, a Social Democratic dream remaining true in spite of rampant globalization. Taxes are high, and so is public spending. The watchwords are redistribution, regulation and egalitarianism. And yet, Denmark's unemployment is lower than Euroland's, and their prosperous economy is doing fine, thank you very much.

Hence the underlying message of the rejectionists to all good Europeans: "We don't know where we are going on this journey, but we have reached the end of a 50-year-old road along which European integration was practiced on the sly. The classic Monnet method was to Europeanize this or that economic sector, and the half-hidden premise was that each step would set up irresistible forces toward ever more integration — all the way to the political realm. And we don't like it."

If it were just Denmark, Europe could shrug off the fall of the sparrow. But the Danes have articulated a malaise that stretches from Barcelona to Berlin. Where are we going, and why? Having lost much of our autonomy, do we want to give up our sovereignty as well? Are we in this for the goodies, such as the freedom to trade and to travel, or do we want to switch our loyalties to Brussels and Strasbourg (the seat of the European Parliament)?

This is why the Danish nej should be seen as a salutary shock. Europe is now left with three choices: business as usual, meaning muddling through; integration à la carte whereby, say, the original Six proceed faster and farther; or a soul-searching constitutional debate on how power is to be shared between the states and "Europe."

The first choice is the most likely one because "muddling through" requires little imagination or effort. A Europe of "differing speeds" might work, too. But the most critical and courageous path would be No. 3: to ask, where do we want to go, and why? Put differently, this exercise is about the integration not of sectors, but of souls. It demands less pontificating and more persuasion; less fog and more light. All of Europe, the people as well as the politicos, may now reenact precisely the tortuous debate of the Danes. Let's talk not about emu but about emotions. Let's have a kind of constitutional convention that makes explicit how far we are — and should be — willing to go. And let's do it the Linux rather than the Microsoft way: write the program but keep the architecture open.

This edition's table of contents
TIME Europe home


More stories from TIME Europe and related links

E-mail us at mail@timeatlantic.com





More Stories

October 9, 2000

COVER STORY
Wave Goodbye
A humiliating defeat in the Yugoslav elections leaves Milosevic clinging to power. But his days are numbered

EUROPE
Nej!: The Danish Fallout
Denmark's stunning rejection of the euro will be felt across the European Union and beyond

Denmark's Message
Hamlet's heirs want to know where Europe is going

A Tale of Two Cities
After 10 years of unity, Germany is still a nation divided by its past and burdened by the costs of its future

Poland's Second Left Wing
Lech Walesa and Solidarity each face crushing electoral defeat

Tax, Lies and Videotape
A juicy political scandal marks a nasty, if bizarre, beginning to the Chirac-Jospin presidential race

Bounty Descendants Hunt A Future
Like their mutinous ancestors, the people of Pitcairn face hard times

MIDDLE EAST
Bibi Bounces Back
Netanyahu's corruption case is dropped, but will he rejoin — and be welcomed into — the political fray?

OLYMPICS
Sydney's Glorious Failure
Australia shows the world that a clean, orderly Olympics can be a winner

THE ARTS
The Fashion Games
These seven up-and-coming fashion designers are the ones to watch as they show their stuff for spring

Team Spirit Wins Again
A bleak story of football, the I.R.A. and Belfast's troubles becomes the stuff of a brave new musical

DEPARTMENTS
Techwatch

World Watch

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
E-mail us at mail@timeatlantic.com

Copyright © 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
E-mail us:  Letter to the Editor | Customer Service
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Press Releases