 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Right Time
Blocking the march of Jean-Marie Le Pen
[May 6, 2002] |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
E-mail your letter to the editor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
GILLES LEIMDORFER/RAPHO for TIME |
 |
Posted Sunday, April 14, 2002; 15.05GMT
Although ENA is identified with this career shift from public administration into business — known in the trade as pantouflage — it has always been the prerogative of a privileged minority among the school's students. For ENA caters to two clearly defined groups. The overwhelming majority of 2001's intake of 120 students was drawn from two separate entrance exams: one "external" for graduate students under the age of 28 and one "internal" for low-ranking civil servants under 47. Once admitted, both groups follow the same course of studies. In their first year they do two internships, one in a préfecture, the state's local office in each of the country's départements, and one in an embassy. The second year focuses on administrative law, economy and finance, public management and international relations, all dealt with in the form of case studies. Exams at the end of the second year classify the students into a ranking from one to 120, with the best-placed getting first pick of that year's available posts. Typically, hot-shot young graduates from the "external" intake do best in the final exams and opt for the administrative fast track of the grands corps d'etat, the three élite branches of the French civil service that guarantee the best career prospects. Members of the grands corps used to be shunted off into business after a career in public administration. Today, private firms want to groom their executives in-house, so recruits tend to leave the civil service after five or 10 years.
A position in the private sector "only ever concerned the top 10 or 20% of each year's graduates," says the investment banker. "The rest spent their entire career in the civil service. The ones who made the move were more or less the same people who did best in the final ranking."
ENA's claims to be a practical training ground for administrative all-rounders, capable of working in any government department, are undermined by this division into the chosen few — who will select between the best that the public and private sectors have to offer — and the rest, those slated for a more mundane career in the civil service. "ENA isn't a school, it's a selection procedure," insists Jacques Attali. "If you're ranked in the top 15, your life will be totally different than if you're number 16 or below. The function of ENA is simply to arrive at this final 15."
ENA is faithful to the idea that underlies all French schooling: successive selection within universally available public education is the fairest way of forming an élite. Indeed, one of de Gaulle's aims when he founded the school was to break the upper-middle classes' monopoly on the higher echelons of the civil service by imposing unified training for the entire administration and doing away with the individual entrance exams for each branch, which had become breeding grounds for nepotism. But like the rest of France's public school system, ENA is no longer generating the egalitarianism and social mobility that had been its raison d'être. Today only 9% of students come from working-class backgrounds, compared with 29% in 1950.
"French élitism was based on the idea that all schools and teachers have the same values and that all students have the same sociocultural background," says Richard Descoings, president of Paris' Institute of Political Studies. "The problem is that it's no longer true. For a long time ENA was the summit of that system, but today the system has collapsed." The spread of enterprise culture and international competition have put new emphasis on performance criteria, discrediting the old French tradition of early selection. "The system assumed that if you're good at 25, you'll be good for all eternity," Descoings adds. "But in France, as elsewhere, you can be very brilliant at 20 or 25 and a bad professional at 40."
As a symbol of post-war Gaullist France, ENA today finds itself caught in a pincer movement. In a multicultural society where the state has ceded ground to private actors, its fast track to success looks anachronistic. Meanwhile, the upper-middle classes, which form its prime constituency, are abandoning the civil service in favor of the higher wages and more attractive career prospects offered by the private sector. "Private business and private management techniques have gained new legitimacy," says Rouban at the Center for the Study of French Politics. "Society has become pluralistic, political power is more fragmented and Europe is exerting a growing influence. The result is a question mark over the role of élites in France and over the role of ENA and the civil service in particular."
ENA itself is working hard to answer the questions about its future. Inside its Strasbourg headquarters — a former prison whose forecourt used to be a graveyard — assistant director of studies Renaud Dorandeu explains how the school is focusing on the tasks facing today's civil servants. Three years ago ENA introduced a public management section, which aims to present the managerial and negotiation techniques specific to public administration. "For years, the rising tide of neo-liberalism maintained that private sector solutions could be imported into the public sphere," says Dorandeu. "It's not true. The state's role today is setting up partnerships with other actors and managing change." The staff emphasizes the practical administrative skills the school offers young graduates and the continuing education it provides for existing civil servants. "ENA's refocusing on its original vocation to train high-ranking civil servants," says one recent graduate. "But the problem is the final ranking. It's a block that prevents the curriculum from developing." Peter Boxer, on a one-year secondment from Britain's Foreign Office, is less diplomatic: "It's a very traditional system," he says. "We Brits aren't great at facing up to modern challenges, but the French are worse."
Yet the days of ENA's monopoly over a uniform national élite are over. Like dying stars, the school's prominent ex-students still shine in the national firmament, but their brilliance is fading. And though it may not be to every old Jacobin's taste, it's the graduates of business schools and MBA programs who are now burning brightest.
With reporting by JOE PERRY
|
|
