|
FIRST PERSON: TEMPLE GRANDIN
Myself
I was 21/2 years old when I began to show symptoms of autism:
not talking, repetitious behavior and tantrums. Not being
able to communicate in words was a great frustration, so l
screamed. Loud, high-pitched noises hurt my ears like a dentist's
drill hitting a nerve. I would shut out the hurtful stimuli
by rocking or staring at sand dribbling through my fingers.
As a child, I was like an animal with no instincts to guide
me. I was always observing, trying to work out the best ways
to behave, yet I never fit in. When other students swooned
over the Beatles, I called their reaction an ISP--interesting
sociological phenomenon. I wanted to participate but did not
know how. I had a few friends who were interested in the same
things, such as skiing and riding horses. But friendship always
revolved around what I did rather than who I was.
Even today personal relationships are something I don't
really understand. I still consider sex to be the biggest,
most important "sin of the system," to use my old high school
term. From reading books and talking to people at conventions,
I have learned that autistic people who adapt most successfully
in personal relationships either choose celibacy or marry
someone with similar disabilities.
Early education and speech therapy pulled me out of the
autistic world. Like many autistics, I think in pictures.
My artistic abilities became evident when I was in first and
second grade, and they were encouraged. I had a good eye for
color and painted watercolors of the beach.
But words are like a foreign language to me. I translate
them into full-color movies, complete with sound, which run
like a videotape in my head. When I was a child, I believed
that everybody thought in pictures. Not until I went to college
did I realize that some people are completely verbal and think
only in words. On one of my earliest jobs, I thought the other
engineer was stupid because he could not "see" his mistakes
on his drawings. Now I understand his problem was a lack of
visual thinking and not stupidity.
Autistics have trouble learning things that cannot be thought
about in pictures. The easiest words for an autistic child
to learn are nouns because they relate directly to pictures.
Spatial words such as over and under had no meaning for me
until I had a visual image to fix them in my memory. Even
now, when I hear the word under by itself, I automatically
picture myself getting under the cafeteria tables at school
during an air-raid drill, a common occurrence on the East
Coast in the early 1950s.
Teachers who work with autistic children need to understand
associative thought patterns. But visual thinking is more
than just associations. Concepts can also be formed visually.
When I was little, I had to figure out that small dogs were
not cats. After looking at both large and small dogs, I realized
that they all had the same nose. This was a common visual
feature of all the dogs but none of the cats.
I credit my visualization abilities with helping me understand
the animals I work with. One of my early livestock design
projects was to create a dip-vat and cattle-handling facility
for a feed yard in Arizona. A dip vat is a long, narrow, 7-ft.-deep
swimming pool through which cattle move in single file. It
is filled with pesticide to rid the animals of ticks, lice
and other external parasites. In 1978 dip-vat designs were
very poor. The animals often panicked because they were forced
into the vat down a steep, slick decline. They would refuse
to jump into the vat and would sometimes flip over backward
and drown.
The first thing I did when I arrived at the feedlot was
put myself inside a cow's head and see with its eyes. Because
their eyes are on the sides of their head, cattle have wide-angle
vision. Those cattle must have felt as if they were being
forced to jump down an airplane-escape slide into the ocean.
One of my first steps was to convert the ramp from steel to
concrete. If I had a calf's body and hooves, I would be very
scared to step on a slippery metal ramp. The final design
had a concrete ramp at a 25o downward angle. Deep grooves
in the concrete provided secure footing. The ramp appeared
to enter the water gradually, but in reality it abruptly dropped
away below the water's surface. The animals could not see
the drop-off because the dip chemicals colored the water.
When they stepped out over the water, they quietly fell in
because their center of gravity had passed the point of no
return.
Owners and managers of feedlots sometimes have a hard time comprehending
that if devices such as dip vats and restraint chutes are properly
designed, cattle will voluntarily enter them. Because I think
in pictures, I assume cattle do too. I can imagine the sensations
the animals feel. Today half the cattle in the U.S. are handled
in equipment I have designed.
Grandin is an
assistant professor of animal sciences at Colorado State University
|
|
|

FOOD & DRINK
Chefs
Who Shine
Nothing in the food world beats a Michelin star. TIME talks to the
five European chefs receiving top honors
PROFILE
Model
Example
Waris Dirie wants to alert the world to the plight of millions of
young women
|
BUSINESS
No Picnic Teddy bear rivals feud over new "make-your-own" models
ARTS
Urban
Legends Young British artists are opting for cityscapes with a
hint of darkness
|
|
|
|
|