-
ADD TIME NEWS
- NEWSLETTERS
- Main
- Environmental Heroes
- Extinction 2009
- Science of Appetite
- Going Green
- Wellness Blog
- Wellness Stories
- America the Fit
- Videos
Hot on the 'Hobbit' Trail
The
These extraordinary claims brought out scores of critics. Maybe these were just a type of pygmybut pygmies have normal-size brains, and the hobbits’ brains were tiny. OK, so maybe the Australians had dug up a child, or maybe the skull came from someone with microencephaly, a condition that keeps the head and brain from growing properly. These questions would have been easier to answer if other scientists could have examined the fossils; unfortunately, Indonesian paleontologists snatched them up and squirreled them awayand, it turns out, damaged them.
But now Morwood and Brown and their collaborators have announced a new find in the latest issue of Nature: a jaw and other bones, from what they believe is a total of nine individuals. And it looks as though the original idea stands up: the fossils’ proportions confirm that these creatures were indeed very small, and that their skulls didn’t have the characteristics either of modern pygmies or of microcephalicstwo microcephalic skulls in such a small collection of remains would be absurdly unlikely anyway.
Another of Morwood and Brown’s theoriesthat their hobbits evolved directly from Homo erectus, which was thought to have died out a half-million or so years agowhich the critics lambasted, is now looking less likely. But their new idea is even more audacious: the hobbits, they suggest, may come directly from the Australopithecus family, which went extinct something like 2 million years ago. Their detailed argument for this notion has yet to be published, and critics are still very cautious even about embracing the idea that the hobbits represent a new species at all. But while he agrees that more evidence is needed, Daniel Lieberman, a Harvard paleontologist who composed a commentary on the new discovery for Nature, writes: "...it seems reasonable for Morwood and colleagues to stick to their original hypothesis that H. floresiensis is a new species.”
Most Popular »
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- Priests Spar Over What it Means to Be Catholic
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- The Ft. Hood Hero: Who is Kimberly Munley?
- Troubles for a Deal and for Obama in Honduras
- The Meaning of Manny Pacquiao
- Hasan's Therapy: Could "Secondary Trauma" Have Driven Him to Shooting?
- Indie Film Shakeout: There Will Be Blood
- Hunting for Tuna: The Environmental Peril Grows
- A Christmas Carol Wins And Loses the Weekend
- Priests Spar Over What it Means to Be Catholic
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- To Help The Kids, Parents Go Back to School
- Let's Bail Out the Pot Dealers!
- Indie Film Shakeout: There Will Be Blood
- Hunting for Tuna: The Environmental Peril Grows
- Why We Look at Some Web Ads and Not Others
- Is the Dollar Dying a Slow Death?
- The Meaning of Manny Pacquiao







RSS