-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
- Main
- Environmental Heroes
- Extinction 2009
- Cop15
- Going Green
- Wellness Blog
- Wellness Stories
- America the Fit
- Videos
Hot on the 'Hobbit' Trail
The
These extraordinary claims brought out scores of critics. Maybe these were just a type of pygmybut pygmies have normal-size brains, and the hobbits’ brains were tiny. OK, so maybe the Australians had dug up a child, or maybe the skull came from someone with microencephaly, a condition that keeps the head and brain from growing properly. These questions would have been easier to answer if other scientists could have examined the fossils; unfortunately, Indonesian paleontologists snatched them up and squirreled them awayand, it turns out, damaged them.
But now Morwood and Brown and their collaborators have announced a new find in the latest issue of Nature: a jaw and other bones, from what they believe is a total of nine individuals. And it looks as though the original idea stands up: the fossils’ proportions confirm that these creatures were indeed very small, and that their skulls didn’t have the characteristics either of modern pygmies or of microcephalicstwo microcephalic skulls in such a small collection of remains would be absurdly unlikely anyway.
Another of Morwood and Brown’s theoriesthat their hobbits evolved directly from Homo erectus, which was thought to have died out a half-million or so years agowhich the critics lambasted, is now looking less likely. But their new idea is even more audacious: the hobbits, they suggest, may come directly from the Australopithecus family, which went extinct something like 2 million years ago. Their detailed argument for this notion has yet to be published, and critics are still very cautious even about embracing the idea that the hobbits represent a new species at all. But while he agrees that more evidence is needed, Daniel Lieberman, a Harvard paleontologist who composed a commentary on the new discovery for Nature, writes: "...it seems reasonable for Morwood and colleagues to stick to their original hypothesis that H. floresiensis is a new species.”
Most Popular »
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Toilets
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- The Story of Barack Obama's Mother
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Toilets
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Troubling Rise of Facebook's Top Game Company
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Junior Eurovision: Schoolyard Crushes with Glitter







RSS