- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Who Won and Lost at Bali
A delegate at the UN Climate Change Conference carries his child as he watches a demonstration at the venue of the meeting on Bali.
(2 of 2)
WHO WON
After years of essentially rolling over against the Bush Administration on climate change, the EU showed surprising spine. A mid-week threat led by Germany to boycott the upcoming major emitter' conference a Bush initiative that would bring together the world's biggest economies to talk about climate change
But the clear big winners are China and India, which have fully arrived as major players on international climate action. China in particular came to Bali ready to negotiate hard, but also prepared to give something a vital change after years of insisting that it would take no responsibility for climate change. While India began the negotiations seemingly disengaged, the country elevated its game in the final day, and showed that it was willing to go beyond its own narrow national interests. That was the case for the developing world as a whole, which stood up to the U.S. without scuttling the possibility of a future deal. "The developing countries allowed this discussion to begin in a whole new way," says David Doniger, policy director for the Natural Resource Defense Council's climate center.
WHO LOST
It should be difficult for a country to make the final concession that allows a landmark deal to fall into place, and still appear selfish and churlish but the U.S. somehow managed to do that. Years of blocking climate action at every turn meant the Bush Administration came into the Bali talks with little public credibility, and while there was a sense before the talks that the U.S. might show flexibility, that hope was quickly dispelled. Throughout the negotiations the U.S. with help, at least until the last night, from Canada, Australia and Japan blocked attempts to make climate diplomacy match the urgency of climate science. "The U.S. needed to come in here and build up its credibility," says Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Instead, they just burnished their Darth Vader image."
WHAT'S NEXT
That's the real question. The roadmap outlines the next steps for negotiation, and calls for a deadline of 2009 in time to have a formal successor to the Kyoto Protocol. But as tortuous as Bali was, the next round which will have to tackle the specific actions to be taken by developed and developing nations alike
But at least we all seem to be headed in the same direction, if not at the same speed. "This is not an issue between the developed world and the developing world," said Narain Meena, India's Minister of State for the Environment and Forests. "This is a global issue. The challenges are huge. The task is huge."
Most Popular »
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- Who Were the First Americans?
- Counterterrorism: The Debate Moves Right
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Why Europe Is Worried
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- A Tree Carving in California: Ancient Astronomers?
- U.S. Troops Prepare to Test Obama's Afghan War Plan
- Are the Bible's Stories True? Archaeology's Evidence
- In Marriage, Worse First Can Mean Better Later
- U.S.-China Friction: Why Neither Side Can Afford a Split
- Asian Carp in the Great Lakes? This Means War!
- What Is Robert Gates Really Fighting For?
- Toyota's Safety Problems: A Checkered History
- Obesity in Kids: Three Lifestyle Changes that Help
- The Problem with Football: How to Make It Safer
- Getting Real About the High Price of Cheap Food
- Republicans Must Embrace the Vital Center





RSS