|
||||
|
|
LETTERS | APRIL 27, 1998 VOL. 151 NO. 17 |
|---|---|---|
Letters AFRICA RISING
Your report "Africa Rising" was a welcome contribution to a
better understanding of what's really happening on the continent
[March 30], but I missed seeing coverage of the overall economic
situation there. Business is carried out in the name of free and
fair competition, and that requires a balance of power. But
there is no such balance. There is virtually no protection for
Africans against the imported goods and surplus produce from
Europe that are being dumped on the market. For many Africans,
life is solely a matter of survival, and freedom of speech has
very little meaning.
Blame for Africa's ills has in the past been wrongly laid at the
doorstep of foreigners. We have come to accept that our choices
of the wrong political and economic models following
independence from the colonial powers have been the cause of
most of our present misery. The economic and political reforms
now under way in many of our countries will at long last
translate into more freedom and higher living standards for us.
In Kenya and other African countries reforms are being
implemented that will result in privatization of state
enterprises, more efficient public-service structures, a
concerted fight against corruption, and removal of economic
controls. It is no exaggeration to state that Africa is the
new--and last--frontier for investors.
There is much speculation as to what Clinton's visit has meant
for South Africa. I wonder just what impact this trip has had on
all the President's men and the President himself. Africa has
much to give and teach to those open enough to receive and learn.
You stated that "Life is finally looking up for many Africans,"
but those of us committed to the resettlement of refugees know
that it is not getting better, unfortunately, for many others.
All in Africa is not a bed of roses. The thorns are still
tearing away at millions of dispossessed people throughout the
continent who have lost their homes. U.S. refugee policy closes
the door on some of the most severely oppressed and displaced
people in the world. The number of Africans admitted to the U.S.
is absurdly low in relation to the need in Africa.
Leave Africa alone! Let the Africans decide the scale of their
economies, the most appropriate technologies to use and the
level of industrialism that is desirable. Buy their products,
yes. Offer favorable terms of trade, yes. But don't organize
their economies for them by offering Western models of unlimited
growth in a finite environment. Multinational corporations that
do business in Africa should guarantee that most of the benefits
go to Africans.
You struck a good balance in your article between the political
and economic progress many African nations have made and the
considerable challenges remaining for the continent. While we
don't want to have unrealistic expectations, prospects for an
African renaissance are brightening. As you reported, African
countries are opening their economies, allowing individuals to
prosper and achieve independence from development aid. It is
encouraging that Eritrean President Issaias Afewerki and other
new-era African leaders understand the need for Africans to
shape their own destinies, creating self-sustaining countries.
The bipartisan African Growth and Opportunity Act promises to
further this progress by encouraging economic reforms and
promoting mutually beneficial trade with the U.S. TOLERATING CLINTON'S FLAWS
Are we in denial of the obvious? Are we not aware that America's
own declining moral and ethical standards are reflected in the
polls that sanction the alleged conduct of the President [March
30]? We individually need to become cognizant of our own
personal values in order to effect change. Americans should not
accept less than the most noble of ideals in our leaders.
Clinton is courageous. He attacks his attackers, tempts fate by
wading into crowds, lies when he must and damns the
consequences. He's crafty, and has outwitted a hostile Congress
by appearing to give it what it wants. He is charismatic and
feckless, and women (apparently) adore him. In the multiplex
theater that is the U.S., the virtual reality is Hollywood, not
Washington. We want a touch of strife and then a happy ending.
Not one of the women involved in the Clinton soap opera took
legal action at the time they claim they were sexually harassed.
Now they appear to be on the bandwagon to enrich themselves one
way or another. They make me feel ashamed to be a woman.
Why are some Americans trying to ruin their nation by harassing
President Clinton? People are trying to dig up anything they can
to destroy him. But he is only human, capable of committing
mistakes. Don't condemn him. Instead, try to see the good he has
done. Americans are lucky to have him.
The U.S. used to be the country where the Bill of Rights was the
law. Now it seems that the Rights of Bill are ruling the
country. Shame on him.
What is immoral is not President Clinton's having normal sexual
impulses but for Clinton haters to disgrace the President for
such private and trifling matters. What is immoral is hating
someone as much as Clinton's detractors do, seemingly just for
the purpose of destroying him.
I find the interest in Clinton's sex life unbelievable! All the
media can do is go on and on about the President's behavior!
This is stupid, rude, irrelevant and boring. For God's sake,
let's have a total shutdown on the issue. TECHNOLOGY CAN ALSO HURT
Though very interesting, your report on new environmentally
friendly technologies [March 23] was only part of the story.
Technology is, of course, one of many factors that determine the
degree of damage mankind inflicts on this planet. My formula is
that the amount of environmental degradation is the result of
the size of the population multiplied by the standard of living
(or consumption) times technology. If the population were zero
or if we all lived as hunter-gatherers with zero standard of
living, we would not degrade our planet at all. The role of
technology is somewhat more complex. Its effect depends on the
balance between good and bad technology. Today the bad dwarfs
the good. If we are serious about licking this problem, we need
also to focus on the population explosion (largely poorer
countries) and on an increasingly consumptive society (largely
richer ones). Technology can help, but should we put all our
eggs in one basket? A HAVEN FOR KURDS IN GREECE
From reading your report, one would believe that Greece is
giving military support and training to Kurds [March 30] and
that the Greek people are aware of it and favor it. But there is
no proof that the Greek government supports nurturing Kurdish
nationalism, and the majority of Greek people have a rather
neutral attitude toward the Kurdish problem. What is true is
that Greece is trying to provide these people with a better
quality of life.
I don't understand how western diplomats can still say there's
no hard evidence substantiating Greek aid to the political
branch of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (P.K.K.). As the U.S.
State Department rightly states, the P.K.K. is a terrorist
organization and Greek authorities are working hand in hand with
it by overlooking P.K.K. camps in and near Athens. If such open
P.K.K. activities are a breach of the Anti-Terrorism Act of
1996, why doesn't the U.S. declare Greece a state that sponsors
terrorism? If there is no solidarity and cooperation among
nations against all terrorist organizations worldwide, how can
terrorism in Israel, Turkey, Egypt, Northern Ireland, Spain and
the U.S. come to an end?
Atrocities committed against the indigenous Kurdish population
of Kurdistan by the Turkish forces have been far worse than
anything imagined by Serbian authorities in Kosovo. Yet I
haven't heard any threat of sanctions against Turkey. It is the
oppression suffered by the Kurdish population in Turkey, and not
the alleged Greek support of Kurds, that is the real reason for
the "cycle of violence and vengeance." HINDUS AT THE HELM
The transition from the government of outgoing Prime Minister
Inder Kumar Gujral to the newly elected Hindu leader Atal Bihari
Vajpayee was an anticlimax for the Indian democracy [March 30].
Gujral strove for peace on the subcontinent. Vajpayee symbolizes
religious militancy, a hawkish nuclear policy and a
confrontational stance toward India's neighbors. Fifty years
after the country gained independence, the Indian electorate
should have shown more maturity and voted for a more moderate
and liberal leadership, one that could work for an integrated
Indian nation that could live in peace with itself and its
neighbors.
Your report highlighted the fears of minorities under
Vajpayee's government. I agree with the senior party official
who described Vajpayee as a kind of jovial "mask" hiding his
party's sterner features. In my view, Vajpayee is hiding the
Hindu party's "sinister plans." DOING IT SUHARTO'S WAY
Indonesian President Suharto is acting like a kleptocrat who
allows those under his care to suffer for his failures [March
23]. He must be made to understand that finding solutions to
Indonesia's economic disarray isn't about losing face but about
the salvation of 202 million people. This "my way or the
highway" behavior of Suharto's is an insult to the International
Monetary Fund and other bodies that have come to Indonesia's
aid. The West should take care not to label any Third World
nation with an overactive economy a "tiger." Such a name might
make the leader of a nation thumb his nose at his benefactors.
Suharto, after viewing Indonesia as a cash cow for the past
decades, is finding it hard to cede authority to outsiders.
|
||
time-webmaster@pathfinder.com |
||