|
||||
|
|
LETTERS | JUNE 15, 1998 VOL. 151 NO. 23 |
|---|---|---|
Letters A CURE FOR IMPOTENCE
My husband and I have been married for almost nine years and for
most of that time have dealt with impotence. For us, Viagra [May
11] promises an opportunity to express our deeply felt passion
and love for each other in a way that escapes us most of the
time. For others, it seems to represent a chance to be
better--"to build" on something they already have.
Unfortunately, I have no expectation that our society will
understand the difference between none and some and between some
and more. You don't know what you've got till it's gone.
The latest bit of pharmaceutical foolishness to emerge is
Pfizer's much publicized sex pill, Viagra, which combats
impotence. Unfortunately, it is being sought after by masses of
men who are feeling forlorn. But before taking the pill, they
should read everything they can about the negative side effects.
Then they can decide whether the risk is worth the pleasure of
the moment. I hope common sense will prevail. If sexual
performance is fading, so be it! It may be wiser to exchange
machismo for maturity. That is the true measure of manliness.
There may well be a huge demand for Viagra, but is there a
sufficient supply of willing sex partners to satisfy the
resulting appetite for intercourse? Pity the working women, the
mothers and partners who are content with the status quo. The
true winners with Viagra are the drug companies and, of course,
the sex workers. Thanks to all those unsatisfied Viagra junkies,
they will now experience a boom in trade.
Although brand recognition in the 20th century has been led by
Mickey Mouse and Coca-Cola, perhaps the 21st century will belong
to Viagra. Hurrah for the new millennium! Viagra, drugs and rock
'n' roll.
Aren't you media people the ones who gave us all the hype about
the diet drugs fen/phen and Redux, which turned out to have a
dark side? I see no apology for that coverage and little caution
in the current frenzy over Viagra.
The Vatican refuses to condone the use of birth control pills
yet unofficially endorses Viagra, prostituting itself to some
warped code of priorities. So men are allowed to bang away while
women remain sinners. No wonder thinking Catholic women have
become religiously stateless, bound by years of indoctrination
but alienated by rampant discrimination in the church.
When Viagra is available around the world, especially in Asia,
there will be hope for those poor endangered animals whose body
parts are thought to have an aphrodisiac quality. What a
salvation for rhinos, tigers, bears and seals. And for
two-legged animals as well.
With the possible exception of Dr. Ruth, I doubt that the famous
people you quoted on Viagra know anything about the anguish and
frustration associated with impotence. Those who are positively
affected by Viagra aren't thinking about a performance-oriented
society, could care less about the feminist agenda and don't
look at the penis as a weapon. They are simply thrilled to have
a sex life like everyone else.
Which is more ridiculous: Bob Guccione talking about feminism or
Camille Paglia talking about erections?
Did anybody bother to ask women their opinion before inventing
Viagra? I'll bet 9 out of 10 of us who are over 60 would tell
you that we do not want bad-tempered, horny old men on our hands.
You missed one point: we old duffers now are downright dangerous!
As you noted, 1 out of 10 men who took Viagra in clinical trials
experienced a blinding headache. I've already given it a name:
Vigraine.
Now if only someone could create a pill for love.
There once was a druggist named Rizer, whose opinion was always
the wiser: "For an evening sublime, Viagra works fine, but for
great sex I buy shares of Pfizer." RELIGIOUS UNREST IN ISRAEL
Although there certainly may be areas of friction in Israel
between some ardently observant Jews and some equally ardent
secular Jews, as described in your article "The Religious Wars"
[May 11], most Jewish Israelis feel and act as a single people,
a family united by its religious heritage, whether its members
choose to observe its rules to a greater or lesser degree. The
populace in Israel is not polarized or on the brink of a
religious civil war.
There have always been conflicts and hatreds between
brothers--Cain and Abel, for example. There will always be a
Jewish nation, divided or not. Leave the Jews to settle their
differences by themselves. The press has helped destroy a
princess, and is working to bring down the American President.
Is the state of Israel next?
During World War II, all Jews were targeted for extermination by
the Nazis. Whether one was Orthodox Jewish or not was
irrelevant. From the ashes of the crematoriums a Jewish homeland
was founded, a place where all Jews could feel safe and welcome.
Today the destruction of Israel could come from within by those
who feel more entitled to exist in the homeland because they
feel more Jewish. How ironic!
Religious Jews in Israel don't understand that they are living
in a secular country like the U.S. In America there are no
fights between religious and non-religious Jews. It is
understood that religious Jews do not govern. But in Israel the
religious Jews think they own the land, despite the fact that it
belongs to a secular government. Israel's Jews should live in
peace with one another. EXPANDING NATO
Bruce Nelan thinks enlarging NATO membership to include the
Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland is a "popular bad idea" [May
11]. I vehemently disagree. Nelan postulates that if Poland were
to get into a scrape with Ukraine, the U.S. would be reluctant
to send American forces to defend the new NATO allies. But every
Pole knows that an independent Ukraine is a guarantee of
Poland's independence. And though it is true today that the new
members face no immediate military threat, what's wrong with
insurance? Finally, Nelan claims that a fresh conventional arms
race will result as the three new members modernize their
armies. He says the three don't need new military hardware.
Would he prefer a neutral and vulnerable buffer zone? Whether or
not these three countries join NATO, updating their armed forces
is necessary. VICTOR HUGO: SO WHAT?
Oh, come on! Your critic Robert Hughes [May 11] wrote that
author Victor Hugo's "drawings make up one of the most striking
testimonies to the image-forming power of the unconscious in all
Western art." That statement is unconscionable. And the fact
that Hugo produced 3,000 known or extant drawings does not make
him an artist; most of us working artists produce that in just
one year. And what is so unusual about Hugo's exhibit of talent
in another field of the arts? Most artists share the ability to
expand into other realms of art--visual, performing, literary,
musical--because of the need to create. Few artists have not
delved into another medium in order to relieve this curious
restlessness. CLINTON AND TORQUEMADA
Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's investigations go on and on
[May 11]. There are few things more frightening than a
self-righteous, self-important "guardian" of public morals and
minds like Starr, that tin-pot Torquemada and spiritual heir to
Heinrich Himmler. We should all be very, very afraid. Even if
the salacious and still unproven charges against President
Clinton are true, these private and personal matters are far
less a threat to the Republic than is the continued trampling of
the Constitution.
We sense that our President has a libido problem, a sickness
almost like an addiction to drugs or alcohol. We believe that he
is in denial, as are most people with extreme personal problems.
Now we have independent counsel Starr. He is spending more than
$40 million, destroying multiple lives and wasting valuable time
trying to prove what we already know. How in the name of common
sense can we allow this to continue? UNFAIR PORTRAYAL
We are writing on behalf of Mr. Wan Kuok-koi. We were shocked to
read "Tales from the Dragonhead" [April 20], which falsely
accused our client of being in association with and the head of
the 14K, the Triad society in Macau. It is our instruction that
at no time in the course of the interview with your reporter did
our client ever admit or represent himself to be in such an
awful position or of any Triad membership. Our client is a
personality of repute whose integrity and fame should not be
casually tainted. Your "Tales" are tales which are explicitly
and implicitly untrue. The article did not quote Wan Kuok-koi as saying he was a Triad member, nor did he admit that to our correspondent. We regret any inconvenience caused to Wan Kuok-koi. --ED.
|
||
time-webmaster@pathfinder.com |
||