|
||||
|
|
LETTERS | JUNE 22, 1998 VOL. 151 NO. 25 |
|---|---|---|
Letters NUKES...THEY'RE BACK
"What nonsense! The Chinese and French have had nuclear tests,
and it was no big deal. India nukes, and suddenly the world is
unsafe?"
India, the world's largest, thriving, secular democracy, has
done nothing illegal in firing off five nuclear explosions [May
25]. It has only taken a small, first step in pursuing its
national security. The concept of taking action should be
understood by the West. I hope future governments of India will
be even bolder and take more definitive steps to safeguard the
country's security.
India's nuclear tests are nothing more than a thumbing of the
nose at the rest of the world, and have little military or
scientific significance. The real "bomb" India has in the offing
is its human time bomb, which will "explode" sometime in the
next century when India's population exceeds that of China. With
India's byzantine social structure, incendiary racial mix and
intense religious rivalry, the fallout from the population
explosion will be far harder to contain than the fallout from
the nukes.
A an Indian I have never before felt so proud. The Big Five
nuclear countries thought they alone had the right to maintain
stocks of nuclear weapons, while others could only shiver in
fear. Not so.
Indians can and do hold responsible positions in medicine,
computer software development, research, space exploration,
finance, manufacturing and the media. Why is it assumed they
will not handle their nuclear program as responsibly as the Big
Five nuclear countries? Why all the hue and cry over the tests,
when the loudest protesters have themselves reserved the right
to testing and have done so umpteen times?
India not only has detonated its nuclear devices but also has
blown up global efforts toward nonproliferation. All the
peace-loving countries, except Pakistan, are in a state of
shock. The West will never be able to understand the double
standards of India.
In an age of tension in the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent
and Northern Ireland, we should not be shocked that India chose
to flex its nuclear muscles. Nor should we be shocked when a
test happens in, say, Iraq or Libya. Getting the upper hand is
the name of the game. Unfortunately, it is human nature for
mankind to take the lead in destroying itself.
The world was never safe. With developed countries having nukes
on the order of multiples of thousands on their shelf, they have
no moral right to ask any other country not to go nuclear. It is
high time they realize they can't force any nation to sign
anything at gunpoint. The world will be a better place only if
nuclear arsenals are totally eliminated, without bias. TREMORS FROM INDIA
What, exactly, is Charles Krauthammer trying to say in his
commentary on India's nuclear tests [May 25]? That a threat
against a country, perceived or real, gives it the right to
nuclear armament? Or that any nation aspiring to "great-power
status" can get there only through nuclear weapons? What,
exactly, does he suggest in place of treaties? Krauthammer's
statement, "Sure, [India] will be penalized in the short term.
But inevitably the world will have to reckon with it," is not
only the epitome of cynicism; it also signals to every two-bit
nation that the only way to be taken seriously in the modern
world is to become a nuclear power. Come on, Charles!
Krauthammer distorted the perspective by narrowly focusing on
India's size to show its quest for world-power status in a
sympathetic light. But India is in no way comparable to the Big
Five nuclear powers. Thirty percent of India's population (300
million) lives below the poverty line; since independence, the
country has intimidated or attacked five of its neighbors, and
its human-rights record has been strongly condemned. There is a
mismatch between the power and dignity that India seeks through
its nuclear weapons and the indignity of its starved and
impoverished millions. PUT YOUR DREAMS AWAY
Your in-depth article was perhaps the most descriptive and
interesting piece I have ever read about Frank Sinatra [May 25].
His contribution to the world of entertainment was so great
because he gave his singing his "all." And for that reason, his
faults, whatever they may have been in the minds of his
listeners, were "nothing at all."
With his voice sinatra moved people around the globe. He was
able to cut across all national boundaries and color, caste and
creed. We should not be ashamed to weep for the man whose music
united us in joy.
Even though I am only 16, I am a gigantic Sinatra fan. Some
people find it hard to believe that a high school student would
listen to someone as "dull and old" as he. That was exactly how
I felt until about a year ago, when I discovered the hip
coolness that Frank and his Rat Pack buddies displayed in their
heyday. When I broke up with my girlfriend a few weeks ago, I
went into my room and listened to In the Wee Small Hours of the
Morning...for an entire night. Even with the variety of music
around these days, I cannot find any other singer or group that
gets to me the way Frank can.
I will remember Sinatra as an arrogant, offensive bully. He
treated the fans who made him with contempt, refusing even to
acknowledge them. As the singer and his burly entourage walked
through a Honolulu hotel lobby, I saw Sinatra's bodyguards shove
fans aside when they approached. Sinatra's voice was made of
gold. The man behind it was a monster.
With "the voice," Sinatra was able to convey the one emotion
that singers of my generation, and even my parents' baby-boomer
generation, were never able to achieve; the pathos, bittersweet
joy, hurt and exhilaration of love.
Through his songs, Sinatra was my first, and best, English
teacher. INDONESIA IN CRISIS
The crisis in Asia is the result of the arrogance of the
region's leaders [May 25]. People here used to say we can
achieve anything because we are smart and work hard. Now, even
as Asia faces severe problems, the rulers are behaving just as
before. Outrageous expenses still exist, corrupt officials stay
in power, and special deals to the leaders' cronies continue. I
believe what Asia needs to end its crisis is not just economic
reform but also for the people in charge to admit to the
mistakes they have made and to concede that they are not
invincible.
History is repeating itself in Jakarta. Leaders come and go;
some last a few years, others several decades. There are several
creative ways of "overstaying" in power; one just has to review
the recent historical events of many countries to appreciate
this. There is one thing, however, that is very consistent:
absolute, excessive and prolonged power can and will corrupt.
Power blinds the correct perception of human dignity, justice
and honor. Whether it is dollar, rupiah, yen, peso or ringgit,
the results are always the same: corruption, nepotism, guns and
gold for the ones in power. But do we ever learn?
Regarding the Indonesian crisis, the director of the
International Monetary Fund said, "Don't blame the doctor for
the illness." I agree fully with his statement. But I wish to
add that the doctor sent by the IMF to Indonesia was a witch
doctor who gave wrong prescriptions, causing more pain to the
people instead of curing economic illness. THE DEPTH OF CARTER
There are two things that Lance Morrow failed to mention in his
review "The Lives of the Saint," concerning President Jimmy
Carter [May 25]. In spite of the mistakes made during the
1979-81 Iranian hostage crisis, Carter brought 53 Americans home
safe and sound, including my husband Bruce, then charge
d'affaires in Teheran. Those of us who went through that ordeal
with Carter were grateful he was President at the time, because
he and Rosalyn Carter showed the hostages and their families
enormous compassion. They sincerely felt our pain. Your review
also should have mentioned that in the week prior to the
dedication of the multimillion-dollar Reagan Building and the
renaming of Washington National Airport, it was barely noted in
the press that Secretary of the Navy John Dalton held a ceremony
at the Pentagon naming the latest nuclear submarine the U.S.S.
Jimmy Carter. As Dalton so aptly put it, Carter is very much
like a submarine in that he runs "silent but deep." It's a pity
that many of our leaders and politicians these days are just the
opposite--loud and shallow. THE BERLIN AIRLIFT
Your story "doing well by doing Good"[May 25] contains two major
inaccuracies. The Berlin airlift was conceived and driven
forward by a Royal Air Force wing commander against initial
opposition. You also failed to mention the facts that over one
third of all flights were made by R.A.F. or British civilian
pilots, and over one third of the casualties were British.
MEMORIES ARE MADE OF THIS Several readers wrote about their admiration for Frank Sinatra [May 25]. Dick Kettenbrink of Jefferson City, Mo., says he "probably heard Sinatra in the womb. My first nonclassical album was A Swingin' Affair, which I got 40 years ago as a 13th-birthday present." He still clearly remembers Sinatra's I've Got the World on a String blaring out of the radio. "I went from being a discriminating music lover to a rabid fan." Another was Richard Wight of Cliffdell, Wash. But he counted himself only a casual admirer until 1962, when he lived in the village of Estartit, Spain. "A small back-street bar had a great collection of Sinatra records," reminisced Wight. "The owner cared for them and played them nightly for his patrons. I have been a Sinatra fan of the first order ever since."
|
||
time-webmaster@pathfinder.com |
||