SOUTH PACIFIC
SEPTEMBER 7, 1998 NO. 36
History In Their Blood
DNA studies confirm Maori beliefs about their ancestors'
origins
By SIMON ROBINSON/AUCKLAND
A battered double-hulled canoe fights through a foaming sea. A
group of emaciated Polynesians lie exhausted and dying below a
tattered sail. Suddenly, one man glimpses a speck of land off in
the distance. Propping himself up in the prow, he points it out
to the others. New Zealand's most famous painting, an 1898 work
by Charles Goldie and Louis Steele called The Arrival of the
Maoris in New Zealand, may be based on a European colonists'
myth, but it remains a vivid reminder that, like the country's
white settlers, Polynesians arrived in New Zealand from across
the ocean.
But when, and from where? A new study of DNA taken from modern
Maori confirms what Maori oral history has long maintained: that
Polynesians from the Cook Islands area 3,000 km to New Zealand's
northeast set off on deliberate voyages of discovery and found
the uninhabited islands their descendants would call Aotearoa
about 1,000 years ago. "Our oral history has often been
criticized for being imprecise," says Professor Mason Durie,
head of Maori Studies at Palmerston North's Massey University.
"This is saying: Don't take our traditions too lightly."
The study, published in the July issue of U.S. journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, looked at
segments of mitochondrial DNA from the hair or blood of 54 New
Zealand Maori. The DNA blueprint in mitochondria, the energy
factories of cells, is passed exclusively by mothers to their
children. Though changes in it occur only by random mutation,
they have taken place often enough over the past 500,000 years
to serve as markers scientists can use to construct extended
"family trees" and thus trace patterns of migration. In east
Africa, where modern humans first appeared around 200,000 years
ago, the mtDNA of the Turkana people has 44 mutations. But as
humans left Africa and fanned out in successively smaller groups
across Asia and the Pacific, that genetic diversity was
gradually reduced. In New Zealand, the last major land mass to
be populated, the mtDNA of the Maori volunteers showed just four
mutations, all of which are also found in Polynesian populations
like those of the Cook Islands.
By feeding the number of mtDNA mutations into computer-generated
statistical models, the Massey team have conservatively
estimated New Zealand's founding female population at between 50
and 100 women. Since mtDNA marks only the female line, the
technique cannot determine the size of the original male
population, but the number of female settlers sits easily with
Maori tradition and should dispel the lingering notion that the
country was settled accidentally, by Polynesian fishermen blown
off course. "With 100 women you either had mighty big fishing
boats manned by women," says Durie, "or the story that migration
was accidental just doesn't hold water."
According to ethnographers, early Polynesian sailors
crisscrossed the Pacific without instruments by reading the
stars at night and swells by day, and fixed their canoe's
position by mentally calculating time, speed and direction. They
could detect islands up to 50 km away by observing birds, cloud
changes or floating debris. Archaeologists and Polynesians have
tested these navigational methods using a global positioning
satellite device and found that "even on long journeys the old
ways were very accurate," says Geoffrey Irwin, a professor of
archaeology at the University of Auckland.
The discovery of New Zealand volcanic rocks in the Kermadec
Islands, 750 km north of New Zealand, and Kermadec volcanic
rocks on Norfolk Island, 800 km to the northeast, proves the
Polynesians "were shuttling all over the place," says Irwin.
"They didn't just come and stay." Plants like the taro, yam and
cabbage tree, and animals like the Polynesian dog, which were
all introduced to New Zealand, are further proof of planned
voyages.
DNA research is filling in other prehistoric gaps. Over the past
decade scientists have found genetic links between Polynesians
and a people who lived in what is now eastern China and Taiwan
around 5,000 years ago. "Once the migration got to the Marquesas
[north of Tahiti] we think it split in two. Some went north to
Hawaii, some south to New Zealand," says Australian National
University professor Sue Serjeantson, who studied
transplantation genes in Pacific islanders in the 1980s. Says
Geoffrey Chambers, a reader in biological sciences at Victoria
University and head of an unpublished study comparing Maori DNA
with that of other Asia-Pacific groups: "There is an exact
living record of these voyages of colonization preserved in the
DNA of their modern-day descendants along the route."