Ah, Certainty!
For a moment I thought another plane had crashed. My wife was watching TV in the next room, when suddenly I heard moaning and then, "Oh, no!" The phone rang not 10 sec. later--my mother-in-law. "Did you see it?" she said. Her voice was loud and agitated. She demanded to speak with her daughter. I was worried.
A few minutes later, I found out what was wrong: a pair of Canadian figure skaters had been cheated out of a gold medal by dicey judging. In other words, no one had died--a huge relief. But try telling that to my Canadian mother-in-law. She called every hour for the rest of the evening, breathless with news of scandal and skulduggery. The unfairness! The horror! Her outrage was infectious. When I sat down to watch the Olympics the next night, I felt excitable too and strangely absorbed--not only by the skating controversy but by the Games in general. I was hooked. In a way that I hadn't foreseen when I had turned on the seemingly endless opening ceremonies a couple of days earlier, I had gone from being a casual observer to an edge-of-my-seat obsessive. A fanatic.
And it felt good. To immerse oneself in this perfect snow-globe universe of skis and skates and sleds, finish lines and stopwatches and scorecards, was to live in a smaller, more manageable world than had seemed possible before the torch was lit, in this winter of Afghanistan and Enron.
Maybe it all comes down to rules. Outside the Olympic Village's tidy confines, there don't seem to be any lately. Suddenly, civilians are targets in war. Suddenly, the job of an accountant is not to total up a client's profits but to hide its losses. Suddenly, advances in technology seem to lead to economic setbacks. But not at the Olympics. The rules still count there, even when they are broken or mislaid, as in the figure-skating meltdown. It wasn't a puzzle, this miscarriage of justice--the world saw it clearly and almost simultaneously. One could judge for oneself what had happened and what it meant, and feel confident in that judgment. Ah, certainty! The Russians slipped up, and the Canadians didn't, and any outcome that didn't reflect this fact, however official, simply wasn't legitimate. Not in my house.
When actual storm clouds loom on the horizon--terrorism, recession, government scandal--people long for a tempest in a teapot. That's just what the skating brouhaha provided, and it's what the Games provide as a whole. The fog of war, which we hear so much about these days, doesn't apply on the men's downhill course or the bobsled track. The distances of Olympic events are fixed. Five hundred meters. A thousand. No more, no fewer. The times are measured to the hundredth of a second by instruments that don't waver. No messy relativism. And the judges--however fallible or mischievous--are monitored by a clear-eyed worldwide audience, not a secretive Big Five accounting firm.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- World Leaders Put Off a Climate Change Treaty
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- The Prisoner Review: A Pretentious Reimagining
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Box Office Weekend: 2012 Masters Disaster
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao
- YouTube Effect: Making Money From Viral Videos
- Does Mexico City Need a Red-Light District?
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- China Investigates Deaths After Swine Flu Shot
- Good and Bad News for Boxing: Only One Pacquiao
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- In Fight Against AIDS, Kenya Confronts Gay Taboo
- Beijing: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Time Essay: The Death Penalty: Cruel and Unusual?
- Gay Weddings in Washington by Winter?







RSS