Making a Priest Pay

What seems to have made Dontee Stokes snap was the news reports. Stokes, 26, was a doting father and an employee in good standing at Superman's Barbershop in Baltimore, Md. The TV runs constantly at Superman's, and Stokes was clearly troubled about the Roman Catholic Church's sex-abuse scandals. "He made comments that the priests should be punished," says Superman's co-owner Damon Fisher. "We were watching last week, and he said, 'It's not fair.'" Last Monday Stokes drove to the home of the Rev. Maurice Blackwell, who had baptized him, and--after reportedly requesting but not getting an apology for an act allegedly committed nine years ago--shot the priest with a .357 Smith & Wesson.

When America's Catholic bishops meet in June, their much anticipated national sex-abuse guidelines will doubtless feature review panels, led by laypeople, that already exist in many dioceses. Most Americans, underwhelmed by the clergy's self-policing, will welcome this. But the message sent by the troubled Stokes, who stands accused of attempted murder after confessing to shooting Blackwell three times, is this: If you do set up lay boards, for God's sake, listen to them. Clerics and laypeople alike are also praying that the shooting--along with the apparent suicide last week of the Rev. Alfred J. Bietighofer, a Bridgeport, Conn., priest accused of sex abuse--foreshadows no trend.

In August 1993, Stokes, then 17, told a therapist that Blackwell had been fondling him for three years during Bible study at St. Edward Church. The charge made news: the vastly popular Blackwell was the first African American to serve as pastor of a Catholic church in Baltimore, tending a thriving, mostly black congregation at St. Edward. The boy passed two police lie-detector tests, but lacking a witness or physical evidence, the state dropped the case. And the church backed its priest, at least in public. Privately, according to Margaret Burns, a spokeswoman for the Maryland state's attorney, in 1993 "the archdiocese acknowledged that there was reason to believe that sexual abuse had occurred." Blackwell moved from the church residency into the nearby home of his mother, and was made to give up his youth ministry. But after a three-month stint at the Institute of Living, a Connecticut facility that treats many priestly abusers, he was reinstated as the leader of St. Edward.

This shocked the diocese's nine-person lay review panel. It wrote Baltimore's William Cardinal Keeler that "the return of Father Blackwell--even under protective constraints--constituted an unacceptable risk. All parish ministry positions...potentially provide access to children." Says P. McEvoy Cromwell, still the board's chairman: "It's the only case that we saw fit to write a letter for."

Cardinal Keeler's reply leaned heavily on the fact that the board had not seen a psychiatrist's "confidential report" offering assurances that Blackwell was no risk for "any...syndrome which might indicate him to be a threat to minors." Nor, Cardinal Keeler continued, "did you have the benefit of meeting with Father Blackwell personally or knowing of the support system that awaited him." He described Blackwell as "humbled" at their encounters. He congratulated the board on keeping the archdiocese "open and accountable"--but rejected its advice.