|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
When Evil Is Everywhere
Did George Bush's world suddenly become a lot more complicated? Or did last week's astonishing events just convince him that he's been right all along? When word leaked of North Korea's secret nuclear program, the President's critics were quick to claim that he had become a prisoner of his doctrine. How could Bush go to war against one tyrant because he might be developing nuclear weapons while negotiating with another who just admitted that he has them? If everyone is either with us or against us, what does Bush do now about Pakistan, our ally in the war on terrorism, if it was the source of North Korea's nuclear equipment? And why go looking for trouble when it seems so determined to come and find us? Al-Qaeda suddenly seemed to be everywhere: Indonesia, Kuwait, perhaps the Philippines, even--if CIA chief George Tenet is right--on our doorstep.
And then there is Iraq, still looming large in the President's cross hairs even as other targets vie for first position. In signing the congressional resolution allowing him to go to war, Bush attacked Saddam because he "promotes international terror" and "seeks nuclear weapons." But Iran, the prime sponsor of Hizballah and Islamic Jihad, is among the world's main exporters of terrorism. And now North Korea has confessed to breaking every pledge it made on the way to amassing its own weapons of mass destruction.
Did last week's events expose the Bush Doctrine as too brittle for an unruly world? Not to hear Administration officials tell it. Instead, they provided fresh evidence that terrorism and nuclear weapons are the twin threats facing the civilized world and that nothing less than a brave and muscular response can save us. "Those who choose to live in denial may eventually be forced to live in fear," Bush declared as he signed the Iraq resolution. Or put another way, all those credulous Clinton folks who cut deals with North Korea to stall its nuclear program, who tossed some bombs on Iraq and walked away, merely postponed the inevitable while making things worse. What was swept under the rug, the hawks say, we are now pulling out and confronting, with an ounce of prevention if possible, a pound of cure if we must.
It would be easier for Bush to be patient with the liars in Pyongyang and contemptuous of the liars in Baghdad if he hadn't set himself up as being morally allergic to deals with the devil. But the Administration has long seen distinctions among the evils in its axis. The North Koreans confessed, which implies a willingness to keep talking. Saddam continues to dodge and deny, which to the Bushies implies that only force can work. "North Korea isn't an imminent threat to anyone," says former CIA Director Bob Gates. "They haven't attacked anyone in 50 years." Iraq invades its neighbors and could use nuclear weapons to threaten the whole region, which--at least until last week--was far more volatile than Asia.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill: Inspired by the U.S.
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- The H1N1 Pandemic: Is a Second Wave Possible?
- Facebook's Secret Code
- Tiger Gets Mulligan from the TV Networks
- The Top 10 FAILs of 2009
- The Pros and Cons of Expanding Medicare
- Europe vs. Google: The Next Chapter
- The Troubles at Kroger: Frugal Consumers
- Uganda's Anti-Gay Bill: Inspired by the U.S.
- The Pros and Cons of Expanding Medicare
- The Troubles at Kroger: Frugal Consumers
- The Job Market: Is a College Degree Worth Less?
- Facebook's Secret Code
- GM's New Leaders: Ambitious for Change
- Disney's Princess: A Breakthrough for Curly Hair
- For Africans Seeking Asylum in Israel, Dangers Abound
- Europe vs. Google: The Next Chapter
- Will Fashion's Biggest Names Kiss the Runway Goodbye?





RSS