Fessing Up to Fats
It's just one little line added to those inscrutable nutritional labels, but the tiny change has sent tremors through the food industry--and may soon be felt in your pantry. Even if you've never heard of or cared about trans-fatty acids, packaged foods will now have to come clean about just how much of them they're packing, thanks to a government ruling issued last week.
To nutritionists, who know all fats are not created equal, that's good news. Unsaturated fats (those that are liquid at room temperature and contain fewer hydrogen atoms) are comparatively benign, but saturated fats (solid at room temperature with bonds filled, or saturated, with hydrogen) are notorious artery cloggers.
In the 1980s foodmakers began replacing "sat fats" with trans-fatty acids--unsaturated oils to which hydrogen has been added. This made the oils thick enough to use in baked products and margarine, gave packaged foods a longer shelf life and made all foods safer--or so it was thought. The new stuff was not listed as a fat, but if you saw a "hydrogenated" oil on an ingredient list, a trans fat is what you had.
That turned out to be a problem. Even small quantities of trans-fatty acids, we now know, raise bad cholesterol and other blood fats. They may also reduce levels of HDL--or good--cholesterol and increase the risk of diabetes. And because of antiquated labeling rules, products that were practically swimming in trans-fatty acids could be called "fat-free."
The industry has resisted adding trans fats to labels, in part because fats are what give snacks their flavor. But in the midst of an obesity epidemic, with lawyers eyeing foodmakers they way they once eyed tobacco companies, something had to give. Last week it did, when the Food and Drug Administration ruled that beginning Jan. 1, 2006, trans-fat grams will be listed right below the sat-fat line.
Manufacturers seemed braced for the move. Even before the ruling, food giant Kraft announced it was reducing trans-fat levels in many products. Last year McDonald's said it would do the same with its French fries, though it has yet to make the change. Frito-Lay already lists trans fats on its products; others are likely to follow.
As a rule, you shouldn't let your combined daily intake of sat and trans fats rise above 20 g. If you're at risk for heart disease, you should aim for 15 g. The math will be a lot easier once the numbers are marked on the labels. --Reported by David Robinson/New York
TRANS FAT: 1.5 grams SATURATED FAT: 1.5 g Jell-O chocolate-pudding snacks
TRANS FAT: 4 grams SATURATED FAT: 2.5 g Dunkin' Donuts glazed
TRANS FAT: 2 grams SATURATED FAT: 1 g Nabisco Original Flavor Wheat Thins
TRANS FAT: 1.5 rams SATURATED FAT: 1.5 g Kellogg's Eggo Buttermilk Waffles
TRANS FAT: 1.5 grams SATURATED FAT: 2 g Nabisco Chips Ahoy!
TRANS FAT: 1 gram SATURATED FAT: 0.5 g Ore Ida Golden Crinkles French fries
TRANS FAT: 0.5 gram SATURATED FAT: 0 g Orville Redenbacher's Popping Corn--Butter Light
TRANS FAT: 0.5 gram SATURATED FAT: 1 g Quaker Chewy Low-Fat Granola Bars, Chocolate Chunk
TRANS FAT: 0 grams SATURATED FAT: 1.5 g Frito-Lay Cheetos
TRANS FAT: 2 grams SATURATED FAT: 1.5 g I Can't Believe It's Not Butter! 70% vegetable-oil spread (stick)
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Amid Concern About India's Lost Clout, Singh Goes to Washington
- Woman Loses Benefits over Facebook Photo
- Toilets
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- The Political Fallout of Egypt's Soccer War
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Will Private Equity Be the Next Meltdown?
- Prehistoric Super-Crocodiles May Have Dined on Dinosaurs
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin
- How One Army Town Copes With Post- Traumatic Stress
- Can the A380 Bring the Party Back to the Skies?
- The Fall of Greg Craig, Obama's Top Lawyer
- Toilets
- Man in Coma Heard Everything for 23 Years
- Female Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Malady?







RSS