Surviving The System
In his role as CEO of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Sam DiPiazza is in a position to check the pulse of corporate America, hearing firsthand from other executives what they think of the effects of Sarbanes-Oxley on the business world. Lately he has been hearing quite a bit of griping. DiPiazza recently talked with TIME's Dorinda Elliott about his concerns. Excerpts:
TIME: Has corporate reform gone too far?
SAM DIPIAZZA: Most people think the changes overall have been good. The system needed change. To demand that CEOs should declare that their financial controls work--how can you argue with that? But in some cases, boards are getting distracted by the rules of compliance instead of the objectives, and that can't be right. I think the pendulum is swinging back.
TIME: Could the U.S. lose its competitive advantage because of an overobsession with rules?
DIPIAZZA: There is some concern that if Europe is less proscriptive in its approach, there will be a competitive advantage. But nobody thinks having independent auditing companies is not a good thing or that having CEOs certify their financial results is unreasonable or that having boards be independent is unreasonable.
TIME: But do you hear griping about reforms?
DIPIAZZA: Yes, all the time. It's about the level of cost for some processes and the sense of boards themselves that [for] the liability they are being held to, the risk is exceeding the reward, whether it's intellectual or financial. It's out of balance. Who's going to want to be on a board?
TIME: What are the biggest problems for business?
DIPIAZZA: The litigation environment needs to be addressed. That's one factor that could cause people or companies to be uncompetitive. It forces people to not take risks. If every time there's a problem, companies get sued, then who will be willing to be directors?
TIME: So, what's good about the changes?
DIPIAZZA: Boards' awareness of their obligations and management's understanding of what they are held in obligation for, the crispness with which we know who we work for and the independent oversight--that's all been good. And money is still flowing into America. Capital finds the place with the highest efficiency and security.
Most Popular »
- E.T. Turns 30: 10 Things You Didn't Know About Our Favorite Extra-Terrestrial
- Nevada Ghosts: Rare Photos From an A-Bomb Test
- Temple of Doom: Scientists Discover Peruvian Tomb Filled with Mummies, Infants
- 15-Year-Old Creates Test for Pancreatic Cancer
- Before and After D-Day: Rare Color Photos
- A Diamond Jubilee
- 10 Dangerous Products You Might Have in Your Home
- Marilyn Monroe: Early Unpublished Photos
- Obama Stumbles? Why the President's Right to Talk About Bain
- Buffett's New Message: Damn the Deal, Keep Work and Life in Balance
- Researchers Probe the Potential Health Benefits of Palm Oil
- A Visit with Turkey's Controversial Religious Movement
- Feeding the Planet Without Destroying It
- Bubble on the Potomac
- Falcon's Liftoff: How a Private Firm Could Change Space Exploration
- The Fatal Flight of the Superjet 100: Why Did It Slam Into a Mountain?
- Learning That Works
- The Man Who Remade Motherhood
- Bibi's Choice
- Seoul: 10 Things to Do




