|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Another Hill for Lance
After seven straight victories in the Tour de France, it seemed he had won over the world--and maybe even the French. But after an explosive story last week in a French newspaper, Lance Armstrong, who famously beat cancer, is in for another tough ride. L'Equipe, a French sports daily with a long history of questioning his accomplishments, ran a four-page feature, "The Armstrong Lie," claiming "indisputable" evidence that in 1999, the year of his first Tour victory, he used the banned performance-enhancing substance erythropoietin (EPO). Armstrong called the charge a witch hunt. "When I peed in that bottle [in 1999], there wasn't EPO in it," Armstrong said during a prime-time offensive on Larry King Live. "No way." But the head of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) suggested the story might be credible. "I don't think, with the greatest respect, you can just say it's the French media again," WADA head Richard Pound said in an interview with TIME.
Or can you? First, labeling the evidence as "indisputable" is a stretch. When taking drug tests, athletes submit two urine samples. To confirm a positive result, both tests must detect banned substances. France's National Laboratory for Drug Detection could test only the remaining, frozen B samples from six years ago. "For EPO, it has happened frequently that the A sample is not confirmed in the B sample," says Christiane Ayotte, a doping expert at the National Institute of Scientific Research in Montreal. Armstrong's 1999 and 2000 victories still stand, as do his five other wins, scored after testing for EPO at the Tour began in 2001.
But the allegations taint his legacy, burnished by his commitment to his cancer foundation. (Armstrong says he lobbied President Bush for $1 billion in cancer research during a recent bike ride in Crawford, Texas.) Lab tests have proved that Armstrong is a physically superior athlete. His heart, for instance, is larger than average, so when times are tough he has more resilience than his adversaries. He may need it once again. --By Sean Gregory. With reporting by James Graff
Most Popular »
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Did Amanda Knox Get a Fair Murder Trial?
- Campus Smoking Bans? Some Saying 'Lighten Up'
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- Obama Shrinks the War on Terrorism
- Is California Sold on Gov. Meg Whitman?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Astronomers Spy a New Planet-Like Object
- Many Mutual Funds Are Up 50% in '09 But Beware
- Sex, Television and Berlusconi's Path to Power
- Can an Eagle Hug a Panda?
- Protecting Jungles: One Way to Combat Global Warming
- The State of Hillary: A Mixed Record on the Job
- Dubai: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Russia's YouTube Craze: Exposing Police Corruption
- Washington: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Bernard Kerik
- Rome: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Can China's Backwaters Save the Global Economy?



RSS