Campaign Finance: Looking for the Loopholes
McCain: His issue finally gets through Congress. Now for the hard part
On the House floor, the wily DeLay hunched over a computer screen, tracking the votes of G.O.P. Congressmen. His Democratic counterpart, California Representative Nancy Pelosi--undertaking her first big assignment as the new minority whip--darted around the chamber, keeping wavering Democrats from changing their mind. As time ran out on the vote, DeLay looked back at the rear door to see if any more stragglers were coming. Finally, he drew a finger across his throat: the signal to end the vote tally. The poison pill failed by a narrow 219-to-209 vote.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
A cheer went up among the reformers, and eight hours later--just before 3 a.m. Thursday--the House finally passed the campaign-finance bill, as 41 Republicans defied threats from their party leaders and voted for the measure. Sponsored by Democrat Martin Meehan and Republican Christopher Shays, the bill would ban unlimited and unregulated "soft money" donations, $500 million of which were raised and spent in the 2000 election. "This changes the architecture of American politics," said Gephardt, bleary eyed and still aching from his operation on the day after the vote. "This bill will allow the people to be heard again."
Not quite yet. The Senate put through its version of the bill last year, but now Democrats in that chamber must pass the House version so the bill isn't sent to conference, where it might languish. Senate Republicans will try to filibuster that vote, but majority leader Tom Daschle believes he has the 60 votes needed to end debate and get the bill to the White House by early next month. Chastened by the Enron scandal, George W. Bush is expected to sign it. He opposed the measure during his primary battle with McCain, but he would rather ride a train than be run over by it. Last week he enraged House Speaker Dennis Hastert by barely lifting a finger to fight the bill.
If the President does sign it, the reform still won't take hold right away. It was carefully designed not to kick in until after the Nov. 5 election. That way, the parties--which have been stockpiling hundreds of millions of dollars since last year--need not surrender that cash before the upcoming battle for control of Congress. The Democratic National Committee also has $30 million in soft money that it plans to spend quickly for a new headquarters. "It reminds me of the old drunk who swears he will quit drinking tomorrow, but he's going to get drunk tonight," says Representative Tom Davis, who chairs the National Republican Congressional Committee, the fund-raising arm for the House G.O.P.
After Nov. 5, however, the bill would have a dramatic effect--preventing corporations, unions and fat cats from writing million-dollar checks to buy influence with the parties. (Enron and its affiliates, for example, spent over $2 million in soft money for the 2000 elections.) But just as water tends to find ways to flow, "money will still get to the campaigns," predicts a G.O.P. fund raiser. Special-interest groups wouldn't be able to use soft money to broadcast attacks on radio or TV just before an election, but the bill doesn't prevent them from putting that cash into direct-mail, e-mails or get-out-the-vote campaigns against a candidate. The soft-money spigot would be shut for the parties, but more regulated "hard money" would be allowed to pour in. Under the bill, a donor could give $2,000 to a single candidate and a maximum of $95,000 to different candidates and party organizations during a two-year election cycle. That's almost double the current hard-money limits. The new power brokers will be well-heeled types "who can bring in a lot of $2,000 checks from their friends," says a senior official at the Democratic National Committee.
- 1
- 2
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- The Stolen E-Mails: Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- The Growing Backlash Against Overparenting
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Five Flawed Assumptions of Obama's Afghan Surge
- The '00s: Goodbye (at Last) to the Decade from Hell
- Jerusalem: A Growing Powder Keg in Mideast
- A Chicago Arrest: Are Pakistani Jihadis Going Global?
- Parents' Sex Talk with Kids: Too Little, Too Late
- The Stolen E-Mails: Has 'Climategate' Been Overblown?
- Max Baucus and His Women
- Why Has Taiwan's Birthrate Dropped So Low?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Morales' Big Win: Voters Ratify His Remaking of Bolivia
- Astronomers Spy a New Planet-Like Object
- Let Down by a Tiger We Never Knew
- Five Flawed Assumptions of Obama's Afghan Surge
- Workers of the World vs. China Inc.






RSS