Eggs on Ice

A patient's eggs are placed on a copper grid before being stored in nitrogen
MOJGAN B. AZIMI FOR TIME
  • Print
  • Reprints

Chr

istia Murdaugh sounds like a typically proud mother when she talks about her little girl Sydney Grace-Louise. "She loves school. She loves to sing. She loves to run and play." But Sydney is hardly your typical 4-year-old. And Christia, 33, is only slightly exaggerating when she calls Sydney her "miracle baby."

That's because when Sydney was born on May 8, 1998, she made medical history as the first child in the U.S. born from her mother's frozen egg. While thousands of children had already been produced from frozen embryos, only one other child in the U.S. had been born from the far more delicate frozen egg, and that egg had come from a donor.


LATEST COVER STORY
Mind & Body Happiness
Jan. 17, 2004
 

SPECIAL REPORTS
 Coolest Video Games 2004
 Coolest Inventions
 Wireless Society
 Cool Tech 2004


PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS
 At The Epicenter
 Paths to Pleasure
 Quotes of the Week
 This Week's Gadget
 Cartoons of the Week


MORE STORIES
Advisor: Rove Warrior
The Bushes: Family Dynasty
Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency


CNN.com: Latest News

Since then, roughly 40 more babies around the world have been born from frozen eggs, raising hope that what has long been considered the Holy Grail of fertility research might someday become a real alternative for women who want to get pregnant after their most fertile years have passed. Unlike embryo freezing, egg freezing doesn't require that women choose the baby's father years in advance.

Now a Los Angeles clinic wants to bring that hope one step closer to reality by opening the first for-profit egg-freezing operation in the country. "It's like an insurance policy," says Dr. Thomas Kim, medical director of the CHA Fertility Center, which wants to start freezing the eggs of women ages 35 and younger beginning this fall for about $8,000. "If they are willing to do it, we are happy to give them the service."

But the center's ambitious plans are sparking a fierce debate among fertility researchers. Is egg banking a godsend for anxious women or a recipe for heartbreak and failure? Kim claims he has the medical results to justify egg banking, and he has several healthy babies to prove it. Critics insist that it will be years before egg freezing will be ready for prime time. "It's a shot in the dark," says Dr. Richard Paulson, chief of reproductive endocrinology and fertility at the University of Southern California's School of Medicine.

With success rates for live births from frozen eggs ranging wildly (anywhere from 1% to 20%, vs. the 30% to 50% rates for in vitro fertilization using both fresh eggs and sperm), it's not hard to see Paulson's point. Even the kindest critics say women would be wiser to wait until more research is done before laying down the cash and taking the powerful fertility drugs needed to retrieve the eggs in the first place. "As a clinician, you so desperately want to help," says Dr. Thomas Toth, a reproductive endocrinologist at Harvard Medical School, "but first we need to make sure it's safe."

The problem with freezing and thawing unfertilized eggs is that it's notoriously hard to do without destroying the eggs in the process. A human egg is a single, liquid-filled cell that is extremely sensitive to temperature changes; ice crystals can easily rupture cell walls, and the solutions used to preserve the egg sometimes wind up destroying it instead. Also, the egg's chromosomes are in a particularly exposed state. If the meiotic spindle — which holds the chromosomes together and pulls them apart as the egg develops — breaks down, as it tends to do when the egg is frozen and later defrosted, then nothing can be done to save it.

That's why success rates with egg freezing have been so dismal. In Italy, the University of Bologna's Infertility and ivf Center leads the world with an impressive 27 frozen-egg babies. But with more than 600 women each year undergoing the egg- freezing procedure there, the center's past success rates have been as low as 1%. Even Reproductive Biology Associates, the Atlanta clinic where Christia Murdaugh froze her eggs back in 1997, has all but dropped out of the field. Of 30 patients, only two delivered healthy babies. A third had a miscarriage, and the other 27 never got pregnant at all. "There is a lot of hype about this," says Dr. Hilton Kort, co-founder of the clinic.

But CHA's Kim and Dr. Eleonora Porcu at the University of Bologna both say recent technical advances have boosted success rates to the same level as embryo freezing, which is about 20%. In Porcu's most recent studies, 70% to 80% of the eggs survived the defrosting process without breaking down. Kim puts the current frozen-egg birth rate at 21%, based on a recently completed study in which 6 out of 28 women in South Korea became pregnant and later gave birth. One even had twins.

Both teams use similar approaches to egg freezing. After retrieving as many as 20 eggs from a woman by stimulating the ovaries with fertility drugs, researchers dip the eggs in a cryoprotectant (a kind of antifreeze) and then a sugar solution, which pulls water out of the cells by osmosis. Then the cell is stored in liquid nitrogen at -320[degrees]F until it is ready to be used.

Kim and his team use a 10-minute, fast-freezing process called vitrification that he says reduces the chance of ice-crystal formation. Porcu, on the other hand, claims comparable results with a slow-freezing technique that takes about two hours and uses more highly concentrated preservatives.

  • Print
  • Reprints

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO, Indonesian President, at a Jakarta rally as he seeks re-election in the July 8 presidential vote
/time/includes/article_video.xml

Time.com on Digg

POWERED BY digg

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO, Indonesian President, at a Jakarta rally as he seeks re-election in the July 8 presidential vote