No Cover For Sharon
The breakup of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's coalition government last week was, on the face of it, a battle over the old issue of West Bank settlements. Labor Party leader Binyamin Ben-Eliezer quit the government ostensibly because Sharon wouldn't reallocate $145 million in settlement funding to poor towns inside Israel. In reality his resignation was motivated largely by his ambition to be re-elected head of his party. And it could have serious implications for Israel's ability to maintain international support for its campaign against Palestinian terrorists.
Sharon's coalition has depended heavily on the presence of Labor to win a measure of international support for its hard-line policies. Now, when world leaders criticize Sharon, he will no longer be able to ship off Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, one of the Labor leaders who resigned, to argue Israel's case. So long as Peres, an architect of the Oslo peace process, remained, there was hope Sharon might negotiate with the Palestinians. That's less likely now. Sharon has already offered the defense portfolio to the recently retired head of the army, Shaul Mofaz, who is hated by Palestinians for leading the big Israeli invasion of the West Bank last spring.
But neither international relations nor settlement policies had much to do with the politics behind the resignation. As Defense Minister, Ben-Eliezer often came off as tougher on the Palestinians than even Sharon, and polls show that Labor Party members would probably oust him as party leader at a conference on Nov. 19. Rather than face that battle as Sharon's Defense Minister, Ben-Eliezer bolted the government to boost his liberal credentials. Sharon, meanwhile, has his own party problems. Likud leaders will meet next week to choose a party president, and Sharon's candidate is being opposed by one backed by former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his chief rival. Sharon has offered Netanyahu the post of Foreign Minister just vacated by Peres, leaving Netanyahu with a difficult choice: hitch his wagon to Sharon or lose face among the party faithful by declining to step up in a moment of crisis.
Most Popular »
- Icelanders Avoid Inbreeding Through Online Incest Database
- The 2012 World Press Photo of the Year
- Why American Kids Are Brats
- Top 10 Celebrity Restaurants
- A Cancer Drug Reverses Alzheimer's Disease in Mice
- Jimmy Stewart: A Hero Home From the War
- The Second Coming of Warren Jeffs: The Jailed Polygamist Leader Prepares His Flock for Doomsday
- Why Is Your Boss Moving to Brazil?
- The Foreclosure Deal: Obama and the Banks Win Big While Homeowners See Modest Reward
- Oscars 2012: Great Performances
- Why Is Your Boss Moving to Brazil?
- The Upside Of Being An Introvert (And Why Extroverts Are Overrated)
- The Second Coming of Warren Jeffs: The Jailed Polygamist Leader Prepares His Flock for Doomsday
- Why Mario Monti Is the Most Important Man in Europe
- Hot-Tub Time Machine
- The Brain: How The Brain Rewires Itself
- Friends With Benefits
- Lessons Unlearned: Why Another Gigantic Famine Looms in Africa
- New York City: 10 Things to Do
- Is Running Bad for Your Knees? Maybe Not




