-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Bush's New Nuclear Push
Alt
Why does the U.S. need new nukes? The Administration argues that the current arsenal consists largely of mammoth city blasters that can't burrow underground where U.S. officials believe nations such as Iran and North Korea are assembling weapons of mass destruction. Moreover, Pentagon officials say, this arsenal is no longer an effective deterrent. Washington's enemies, they say, calculate that the U.S. won't use its existing nuclear weapons because of the widespread carnage they would cause.
But the new plans have their own detractors, including nuclear scientist and Pentagon adviser Sidney Drell, who says even a tiny 1-kiloton weapon exploding 50 ft. deep in rock would spew radioactivity across a wide swath of the planet. Arms-control advocates worry that possessing smaller and more precise nuclear weapons would scuttle efforts to stop worldwide proliferation. Said Senator Dianne Feinstein last week: "This Administration seems to be moving toward a military posture in which nuclear weapons are considered just like other weapons."
Most Popular »
- Retailers Gear up for Black Friday
- 2012: End-of-World Disaster Porn
- Now It's Official: There Is Water on the Moon
- Does Mexico City Need a Red-Light District?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- It's Twilight in America
- Obama in Southeast Asia: Mending Fences in a Key Region
- Why We Shouldn't Give Christmas Gifts
- Iraq's Unspeakable Crime: Mothers Pimping Daughters
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- In a Malaria Hot Spot, Resistance Grows to a Key Drug
- Retailers Gear up for Black Friday
- Iraq's Unspeakable Crime: Mothers Pimping Daughters
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- How to Make Money from Viral Videos
- 2012: End-of-World Disaster Porn
- Behind the CDC's Soaring H1N1 Death Totals
- London Museum Asks Public What to Pitch







RSS