
The Verdict on Abu Ghraib
A r
Schlesinger's report and a separate internal Army probe lay out a series of dubious decisions that fostered the abuses, starting with President Bush's 2002 order suspending the Geneva Conventions for captured al-Qaeda and Taliban members. Rumsfeld then doubled the number of harsh strategies U.S. forces could employ in Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan, allowing measures like stripping prisoners and using dogs to terrify them. Pressured by Pentagon lawyers, the Schlesinger report said, Rumsfeld ultimately banned the worst techniques. But some slipped back into use at Abu Ghraib after those who had used them in Afghanistan and Guantanamo arrived in Iraq. "They were neither limited nor safeguarded" in their application, the panel said.
Faced with these embarrassing assessments, Rumsfeld kept a low profile last week, staying away from the capital. "I don't think anyone with any judgment expects the person in my position to know what's going on in the night shift 6,000 miles away," he said in a Phoenix, Ariz., radio interview.
Rumsfeld's problems seemed to mount over the weekend with reports that the FBI is investigating Larry Franklin, a Defense Department analyst, for allegedly passing classified information to Israel.
Most Popular »
- Why Obama's Afghan War is Different
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- Why Sarah Palin Quit as Governor
- Searching for Palin's 'Hot Photos'
- Behind North Korea's Missile Launch
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- What Michael Jackson Did on His Last Day
- TIME's Summer Reading List
- The Challenge That Awaits Obama in Moscow
- Why Obama's Afghan War is Different
- Afterbirth: It's What's For Dinner
- How Medicated Was Michael Jackson?
- When Benedict Meets Barack
- Why Marriage Matters
- How to Moonwalk like Michael
- Asian Film Fireworks for the Fourth
- Cinema: Senory Senora
- What Michael Jackson Did on His Last Day
- Canada Spends Big to Save GM, So Why Not Mexico?







RSS