-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS

The Verdict on Abu Ghraib
A r
Schlesinger's report and a separate internal Army probe lay out a series of dubious decisions that fostered the abuses, starting with President Bush's 2002 order suspending the Geneva Conventions for captured al-Qaeda and Taliban members. Rumsfeld then doubled the number of harsh strategies U.S. forces could employ in Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan, allowing measures like stripping prisoners and using dogs to terrify them. Pressured by Pentagon lawyers, the Schlesinger report said, Rumsfeld ultimately banned the worst techniques. But some slipped back into use at Abu Ghraib after those who had used them in Afghanistan and Guantanamo arrived in Iraq. "They were neither limited nor safeguarded" in their application, the panel said.
Faced with these embarrassing assessments, Rumsfeld kept a low profile last week, staying away from the capital. "I don't think anyone with any judgment expects the person in my position to know what's going on in the night shift 6,000 miles away," he said in a Phoenix, Ariz., radio interview.
Rumsfeld's problems seemed to mount over the weekend with reports that the FBI is investigating Larry Franklin, a Defense Department analyst, for allegedly passing classified information to Israel.
Most Popular »
- The Fort Hood Killer: Terrified ... or Terrorist?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- The Rogue Returns: On the Road with Sarah Palin
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- Rape and the Plight of the Female Migrant Worker
- Recession Sparks Global Shoplifting Spree
- Star Soccer Player's Suicide Leaves Germany Stunned
- Why Did the Iraq Surge Work?
- Obama's Fort Hood Speech: Lost in Translation
- Why Sexism Kills







RSS