-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS

Does the U.S. Need the Draft?
Wit
Peril lurks around every corner. Even in Ramadi, a Sunni town that the U.S. military considers under its control, the Marines are ambushed nearly every day by insurgents firing rocket-propelled grenades. Convoys passing through the city must navigate a minefield of roadside bombs. The violence has made it impossible to carry out missions to win the hearts and minds of the locals, most of whom have never warmed to the U.S. presence. The Marines in Ramadi don't use tanks and rarely call in air support; instead, they rely on guile, guts and instinct to hunt down the insurgents. Given the task at hand and the large area of operations, units like Captain Kenney's Golf Company look as if they could use help. But with just 137,000 U.S. troops in Iraq trying to defeat an insurgency that has spread to more than two dozen cities and towns, the Marines know they can't expect much. "Could you spend more time here and get a better impression of the city? Absolutely," Kenney says. "Do I need more people? No, I don't."
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Over the course of the U.S. adventure in Iraq, military commanders and Bush Administration officials have been united in their insistence that they have enough troops to win the war, despite the fact that parts of the country have slipped out of the control of the U.S. and its Iraqi allies as the insurgency has grown in ferocity. The consensus seemed to crumble last week, when L. Paul Bremer III, former top U.S. official in Iraq, told a West Virginia audience that "we never had enough troops on the ground" to prevent the looting and chaos that wracked Baghdad after the U.S. invasion last spring. Bremer later scrambled to amend his remarks, contending that whatever the shortfalls last spring, the U.S. now had sufficient numbers in Iraq. But his comments emboldened critics like Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry who blast the Administration for mismanaging the war, and added to nervousness about the military's high-stakes offensive to seize control of the Sunni triangle from the insurgents in time for nationwide elections in January. U.S. officials say that as part of the strategy, the interim Iraqi government will try to win over the rebel-controlled towns by pouring security personnel and reconstruction funds into them, hoping to wean local residents from their support of the insurgents. If that doesn't work and if the central government is unable to negotiate peace with the guerrillas the U.S. military and its Iraqi allies are prepared to attack.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- The Fort Hood Killer: Terrified ... or Terrorist?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Rape and the Plight of the Female Migrant Worker
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- Star Soccer Player's Suicide Leaves Germany Stunned
- Recession Sparks Global Shoplifting Spree
- Why Did the Iraq Surge Work?
- Renting Your House Back: A Solution to Foreclosures?
- The Rogue Returns: On the Road with Sarah Palin
- Why Sexism Kills
- The Fort Hood Killer: Terrified ... or Terrorist?
- Renting Your House Back: A Solution to Foreclosures?
- Recession Sparks Global Shoplifting Spree
- Another Cause of Obesity: The Bacteria in Your Gut?
- Did a Time-Traveling Bird Sabotage the Collider?
- Are You Getting Scammed by Facebook Games?
- Rape and the Plight of the Female Migrant Worker
- Star Soccer Player's Suicide Leaves Germany Stunned
- Maclaren's Stroller Recall: A Stumbling Response Online
- Why Exercise Won't Make You Thin







RSS