Does the U.S. Need the Draft?
COMBAT READY: From a lookout post in Ramadi, a Marine scans the streets for an elusive enemy
Peril lurks around every corner. Even in Ramadi, a Sunni town that the U.S. military considers under its control, the Marines are ambushed nearly every day by insurgents firing rocket-propelled grenades. Convoys passing through the city must navigate a minefield of roadside bombs. The violence has made it impossible to carry out missions to win the hearts and minds of the locals, most of whom have never warmed to the U.S. presence. The Marines in Ramadi don't use tanks and rarely call in air support; instead, they rely on guile, guts and instinct to hunt down the insurgents. Given the task at hand and the large area of operations, units like Captain Kenney's Golf Company look as if they could use help. But with just 137,000 U.S. troops in Iraq trying to defeat an insurgency that has spread to more than two dozen cities and towns, the Marines know they can't expect much. "Could you spend more time here and get a better impression of the city? Absolutely," Kenney says. "Do I need more people? No, I don't."
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Over the course of the U.S. adventure in Iraq, military commanders and Bush Administration officials have been united in their insistence that they have enough troops to win the war, despite the fact that parts of the country have slipped out of the control of the U.S. and its Iraqi allies as the insurgency has grown in ferocity. The consensus seemed to crumble last week, when L. Paul Bremer III, former top U.S. official in Iraq, told a West Virginia audience that "we never had enough troops on the ground" to prevent the looting and chaos that wracked Baghdad after the U.S. invasion last spring. Bremer later scrambled to amend his remarks, contending that whatever the shortfalls last spring, the U.S. now had sufficient numbers in Iraq. But his comments emboldened critics like Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry who blast the Administration for mismanaging the war, and added to nervousness about the military's high-stakes offensive to seize control of the Sunni triangle from the insurgents in time for nationwide elections in January. U.S. officials say that as part of the strategy, the interim Iraqi government will try to win over the rebel-controlled towns by pouring security personnel and reconstruction funds into them, hoping to wean local residents from their support of the insurgents. If that doesn't work and if the central government is unable to negotiate peace with the guerrillas the U.S. military and its Iraqi allies are prepared to attack.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- NEXT PAGE »
Most Popular »
- Jenny Sanford: The Savviest Spurned Woman in History
- America's Most Wanted Teenage Bandit
- Church Group Attacks Christmas Commercialism
- Rattled by Iran, Arab Regimes Draw Closer
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- How to Rule India: Break It Into More Pieces?
- Corliss Appraises Avatar: A World of Wonder
- A Mounting Suicide Rate Prompts an Army Response
- Citi's TARP Repayment: The Downside for a Troubled Bank
- Ayatullah Khomeini Returns to Haunt Iranian Politics
- Church Group Attacks Christmas Commercialism
- America's Most Wanted Teenage Bandit
- A Mounting Suicide Rate Prompts an Army Response
- How to Rule India: Break It Into More Pieces?
- Jenny Sanford: The Savviest Spurned Woman in History
- Citi's TARP Repayment: The Downside for a Troubled Bank
- In Hershey's Possible Cadbury Bid, a School's Fate
- Citi's Dubai Mistake: A Sign of More Bad Things to Come?
- Rattled by Iran, Arab Regimes Draw Closer
- Corliss Appraises Avatar: A World of Wonder





RSS