Chasing the Ghosts
(6 of 6)
The two-day grace for civilians to evacuate stretches to a four-day standstill, as Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jafaari orders a tactical "pause." With his nation divided along sectarian lines over the Tall 'Afar operation, al-Jafaari insists on assurances from military commanders that the battle will be a decisive success. The wait leaves the troops embittered, their momentum lost to what they see as political calculations. "This is turning into a goat f___," bemoans an angry Green Beret. By the time al-Jaafari approves the dreaded assault into al-Qaeda's heartland, it fizzles. Not a hostile shot is fired, not a single enemy fighter is found. Safe houses and weapons caches are empty, cleansed like an operating room. Only one blackened corpse, left rotting for days, is found. "They've even removed their dead," said a Green Beret, not really believing it himself.
What did Tall 'Afar accomplish? At best, the picture is mixed. McMaster did succeed in driving the insurgents out, denying al-Qaeda its Tall 'Afar base and disrupting its networks. Intelligence picked up in Tall 'Afar led to the arrest last week of Abu Fatima, al-Qaeda's military emir in Mosul. The cost in U.S. lives was minimal: only four died in the two weeks of fighting since Sept. 2. At the same time, many of the insurgents who had holed up in the city got away because of the indecision of Iraqi political leaders. And while the Pentagon hailed the operation for displaying the improved mettle of the U.S.-backed Iraqi forces, the operation showed that deep sectarian and ethnic schisms still exist among the Iraqi troops. It's not hard to find commanders who fear they are training troops for a civil war. "I don't know if we're going to be able to prevent what's coming," says a front-line U.S. lieutenant colonel.
With the war wrapped into so many political knots in Baghdad and Washington and the insurgents proving so resilient, the fight in Tall 'Afar, as in Iraq, is far from over. On the ground in the deserted city, the U.S. is pouring money into reconstruction in a bid to win local opinion. But there is every reason to believe the violence will return and the U.S. will be forced to fight there again--with the insurgents betting that the Americans will lose a bit more of their will and support each time they go back. In a house overrun during the battle, a newspaper sits in a living room, its pages brimming with pictures of a U.S. assault in the city. Dated Sept. 2-10, the report could have been an account of this month's battle, but it isn't. It is already a year old. --With reporting by Sally B. Donnelly/Washington
Top Stories on Time.com
Most Popular
-
Most Read
- How Valid is Palin's Abortion Attack on Obama?
- In Battleground Virginia, a Tale of Two Ground Games
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Facing Reality in Afghanistan: Talking with the Taliban
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- US Bank Failures Sit at 13 and Counting
- Wall Street's Big Bounce: Don't Start Cheering Yet
- Is Laser-Powered HDTV the Highest Def Yet?
- Palin's Blown Opportunity on Energy Independence
- London's Gathering Storm
-
Most Emailed
- Does Sarah Palin Have a Pentecostal Problem?
- The Financial Crisis: What Would the Talmud Do?
- BlackBerry's Storm Aims to Blow the iPhone Away
- How Valid is Palin's Abortion Attack on Obama?
- Kids Aren't Getting Enough Vitamin D
- In Battleground Virginia, a Tale of Two Ground Games
- What the Troopergate Report Really Says
- Is Barack Obama American Enough?
- October 11, 2008 - October 17, 2008 - Cartoons of the Week - TIME
- Wall Street's Big Bounce: Don't Start Cheering Yet
Mixx





RSS