|
|
- NEWSLETTERS
- MOBILE APPS
-
ADD TIME NEWS
Woodward Unveiled
(2 of 2)
The core of Fitzgerald's case--that Libby made false statements that impeded the investigation--remains untouched by the Woodward news. But the surrounding weather certainly shifted, as Libby's lawyers called the news a "bombshell" that supported Libby's claim that Plame's identity was common knowledge among reporters. Whatever the impact on Libby, the trouble for Woodward was clear. He seemed to be trapped between his loyalty to the Post and its readers and his parallel franchise, writing best-selling books drawn from sources deep inside the Administration whose identities he promises to protect. He apologized to colleagues for not revealing sooner his role in a leak investigation he had publicly dismissed as "disgraceful." Asked by TV's Larry King the night before the indictment about rumors that Woodward actually knew who the leaker was, he didn't dodge the suggestion but flatly denied it. "I wish I did have a bombshell," he said. "I don't even have a firecracker." He described the leak as "gossip and chatter" that would be of interest only to "a junkyard-dog prosecutor" like Fitzgerald.
After their meeting last week, he had only praise for Fitzgerald, to whom Woodward turned over his calendar from that period and an 18-page list of questions for his book that he had shared with Libby, in which all the queries were blacked out except two related to Plame. During his time with the prosecutor, Woodward said, he found Fitzgerald "incredibly sensitive to what we do. He didn't infringe on my other reporting, which frankly surprised me."
Challenged on his public statements as well as his private conduct, Woodward explained that he had "hunkered down" out of fear of being subpoenaed at a time when reporters like Miller and TIME's Matthew Cooper were being jailed or threatened with jail unless they revealed their sources. Elsewhere in the newsroom, Post colleagues were none too happy. On an internal chat board, columnist Jonathan Yardley argued that "this is the logical and perhaps inevitable outcome when an institution permits an individual to become larger than the institution itself."
It was a rough week all around. The White House confronted another twist that could only prolong a politically damaging case. Fitzgerald confirmed that he would be presenting evidence to a new grand jury. Other possible targets had to be worried that there is still an aggressive investigation going on with the possibility of further indictments to come. And Fitzgerald, a tireless prosecutor with a reputation for thoroughness, had to wonder, after two years and millions of dollars and countless hours of hunting, what else is out there that he missed.
- « PREV PAGE
- 1
- 2
Most Popular »
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Israel vs. Hizballah: Drumbeats of War
- No Churchgoing Christmas for the First Family
- The Pentagon Prepares for a Missile Attack from 'Iran'
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence
- Should the U.S. Destroy Jihadist Websites?
- Will Bad Blood Scuttle the Pacquiao-Mayweather Fight?
- Sean Goldman: Home by Christmas
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- Israel, Hamas Wrestle Over a Prisoner Swap
- Climate Change: How Fast Is the Earth Shifting?
- Sketchy Santas: When Christmas Gets Weird
- How Panera Bread Defies the Recession
- Why Brittany Murphy Is Worth Remembering
- Domestic Terror Incidents Hit a Peak in 2009
- Holland's Plan to Tax Every Kilometer Driven
- Lindsey Graham: New GOP Maverick in the Senate
- Hong Kong: 10 Things to Do in 24 Hours
- Tapping Into India's Growing Alcohol Market
- In Germany, a Disturbing Rise of Right-Wing Violence





RSS